Not exact matches
The religious among us keep trying to chip away at the separation of church and state by
making people recite the pledge of allegiance with the God clause, installing religious symbols and displays on public property, holding prayer breakfasts for politicians, berating the removal of prayer in public schools, trying to pass laws limiting women's
access to birth control, and trying to get an amendment passed outlawing
abortion (since in their view God creates a soul the moment a sperm enters an egg).
When
abortion is
made easier to
access, e.g. by assuring youngsters that their parents need never know, we would predict more youngsters to engage in risky sexual activity.
And why on earth oppose
access to birth control and reforms in the health care system when those will likely
make the biggest difference in actually curbing
abortions in this country?
Given
access to
abortion or gene therapy the decision could be
made to eliminate this fault of nature.
Catholic schools are being forced to
make children aware that, without their parents» consent, they can
access medical contraception and
abortion services, (although we are allowed, kindly, to add our «opinion» of these activities).
If you want to
make abortion safe, legal and rare, support women's rights, women's
access to health care.»
Roe v Wade was about giving women who will
make the choice to have an
abortion access to safe and professional medical care.
According to LifeSiteNews, the article
makes a «pro-
abortion case» but arrives at a «shocking conclusion:» «While
abortion is still legal, it is increasingly difficult to
access, thanks to the closing of so many
abortion clinics and pro-life laws that help women by giving them additional information and alternatives.»
The First Minister said that she was «happy to explore with the NHS what the situation is now in terms of the ability of women from Northern Ireland to
access safe and legal
abortion in NHS Scotland and whether any improvements can be
made.»
Clearly, strict
abortion laws do not stop
abortions from happening, but can
make them less safe by causing delay and restricting
access.
It believes it can cut this number by increasing
access to family planning, addressing unsafe
abortion and
making birth safer by giving women
access to skilled and well - equipped health workers.
For Dr. Daniel Grossman, a professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at the University of California at San Francisco and director of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, if lawmakers want to curb
abortion at a later stage, they should
make it easier for women to
access care in the early stages of the pregnancy.
This year's schedule included a troubling look at the invasion of Uganda by American evangelicals (God Loves Uganda), profiles of reliable boogeymen like Dick Cheney (The World According to Dick Cheney) and the Koch Brothers (Citizen Koch), celebrations of Robert Reich (Inequality for All), Occupy (99 %: The Occupy Wall Street Collaborative Film) and WikiLeaks (We Steal Secrets), and After Tiller, a remarkable all -
access look at the four remaining third - trimester
abortion providers, and the tough choices
made every day within their walls.
Such government restrictions, combined with clinic violence and harassment, have drastically reduced the number of
abortion providers around the country and have
made access to the remaining providers exceedingly difficult for growing numbers of women...» More.
It may cut down on the number of
abortions, like critics want, but Planned Parenthood supporters argue that it will just
make the process of getting an
abortion more unsafe by taking easy
access away from those who need it.
The last election
made clear that Americans reject government interference into their personal health care decisions and Planned Parenthood Action Fund continues to oppose the continuation of several deeply unpopular policy riders that restrict
access to
abortion.
Finally, it should be
made clear that the
abortion coverage restrictions in Graham - Cassidy are part of a broader collection of provisions that would undermine
access to reproductive health services.
Whether members provide
abortions, educate colleagues and the public about
abortion care, or lend their voice in advocating for reproductive choice and the important contribution their professions can
make, their role is vital to increasing
access to comprehensive reproductive health care.
Bottom line: «Defunding» Planned Parenthood is part of a larger agenda to shut down Planned Parenthood health centers and
make it impossible to
access safe, legal
abortion in America.
And they demand a president who will protect
access to safe and legal
abortion — who is tough enough to stand up to anyone who would deny women the right to
make their own health decisions!
The rule
made it clear that it is against the law for state politicians to block people from
accessing care at a health center because the organization also provides safe, legal
abortion.
Ted Cruz supported the Texas bill HB2, the Texas anti-
abortion law that has already shut down more than half of the
abortion providers in the state and has forced some women to wait as long as 20 days, drive hundreds of miles, and
make multiple trips to
access safe, legal
abortion.
Everyone who cares about
abortion access should get ready to fight like hell with me to safeguard that
access, and
make sure everyone in this country still has
access to the full range of reproductive health care.
We hope and expect that ODH will soon approve our request and
make clear that women in the Cincinnati region will still have
access to safe and legal
abortion.
With the shortage of qualified
abortion providers (there are no providers in 87 percent of U.S. counties and in 97 percent of rural areas), Landy and Darney have
made an enormous impact in the effort to ensure that women across the country have
access to the full range of quality health care.
The GOP is obviously against «needless restrictions,» yet they are super cool with medically unnecessary
abortion restrictions that shut down health centers and
make some women travel hundreds of miles to
access abortion (if they can at all).
«
Make no mistake: These are attacks from state legislators who want to end
access to safe, legal
abortion across the board.
We believe unequivocally, like the majority of Americans, that every woman should have
access to quality reproductive health care services, including safe and legal
abortion — regardless of where she lives, how much money she
makes, or how she is insured.
That's why we are fighting back hard and calling this what it is: part of a decade - long campaign of deceiving the public,
making false charges, and terrorizing women and their doctors — all in order to ban
abortion and prevent women from
accessing care at Planned Parenthood.
State legislatures across the country passed more than 60 anti-
abortion measures in 2017, reflecting extreme ideologues» commitment to
making it difficult, if not impossible, to
access abortion.
Extreme politicians in Texas, in Congress, and throughout the country have
made clear they will stop at nothing — pushing lies, misinformation, and fabrications — to end
access to safe and legal
abortion.
In reality, this law harms women by
making it more difficult to
access abortion care.
Each woman — no matter how much money she
makes or how she gets her health insurance — should be able to able to
access the full - range of reproductive health care, including
abortion.
State Senators Bob Onder (R - 2, St. Charles) and Andrew Koenig (R - 15, Manchester) have been wasting taxpayers» time and money by attacking Planned Parenthood and
making it even more difficult for Missourians to
access safe and legal
abortion.
Politicians in Washington and across the country have
made it clear that they are willing to sacrifice women's health in order to restrict women's
access to contraception and
abortion.
She also aggressively campaigned to
make birth control more readily available, particularly for teens, widened the state's HIV testing and counseling programs, and advocated for greater
access to
abortion.
For many people seeking
abortion care, having
access to contraceptive services at the time of their procedure simply
makes sense.
No - fault divorce laws were adopted beginning with California in 1969 and then spread to all 50 states.5 During the 1960s and 1970s, legal
access to birth control including oral contraceptives became increasingly available, and in 1973 the U.S. Supreme Court
made abortion legal in the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.6 These cultural changes created new opportunities for women and led to an increased presence in the labor market, doubling from 30.3 million in the 1970s to 72.7 million in the mid - 2000s.7