Sentences with phrase «make an argument here»

Also, I've seen you make this argument here and in other places where you state that the front office LUCKED INTO the position that they are in today.

Not exact matches

But the other «factual circumstances» here make the argument less likely to hold up in the same way it did for Edwards.

But there's more going on here than poor planning and backroom arguments — something that is making even wary investors outside the corporate bond market sit up and take notice.

There's a depth of reporting here that suggests he took this assignment personally, and he makes a compelling argument that the interests of a publicly traded corporation and a Wall Street culture hell - bent on wringing every last efficiency from a business aren't compatible with the stock in trade of the journalism industry — reporting that earns and safeguards the public trust.

I doubt the union's argument here can be made to hold water, though I would be interested to hear if readers think differently.

And there is a political argument here, against the concessions we've made as individuals and societies to the idea of indebtedness, and the way we've tied it to opportunity and responsibility.

Here is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very valid point:

You'd probably have to come up with a statistical model that estimates what the fluctuations should be given some basic assumptions on how people will buy to make a conclusive argument that there is something fishy here.

«As to seeing every atom or whatever your bs argument, you are the one making the claim here» - And what claim was that exactly?

As to seeing every atom or whatever your bs argument, you are the one making the claim here.

So here we have «Chuck» (aka Mark) pretending nothing was said, no proofs given, no arguments made, so he can pat himself on the back for «denying» the truth and taking (I suppose) some of the sting of losing away with him.

His argument makes sense only if aimed at the Catholic bishops, and even here it falls short because, if surveys are to be believed, most Catholics are not listening.

It is no accident that Percy summons Flannery O'Connor to such questions as well; but unlike her, he does not anchor his response in St. Augustine and St. Paul (we have here no abiding place) nor in St. Thomas, whose argument is insistent that the poet's, the artist's, responsibility is to the good of the thing being made, not with the correction of appetites in his audience.

Please, I'm not making a scientific argument here.

If what you're trying to use here is the ad hominem fallacy - attacking an argument by attacking the person making the argument - then the only people you'll convince with this tactic are those who haven't learned to think critically.

He makes a shallow and easily defeated argument here.

Here David Brooks makes the argument that Elena Kagan, Obama's latest nominee to the Supreme Court, is reminscent of our elite schools» «Organization Kids» — bright, disciplined, articulate, and well - meaning junior careerists who do everything necessary to get ahead in....

All so you could introduce completely fallacious straw men arguments we never made (who mentioned Dispensationalism or the Rapture here?)

While I can not develop the argument here, I believe it makes sense to understand unilateral power as a special case arising out of the more basic relational power, much as determinism arises statistically out of subatomic indeterminancy.

The program's success mirrors the argument being made here — namely, as Leonard Saxe's research has shown, students who go on the ten - day trip do so primarily because it promises a meaningful and enjoyable Jewish experience.

Here you can make your arguments for or against, pro or anti and it makes no difference to me, that is MY personal stance, nothing more.

You have made arguments that immigrants do not come here wishing to be American anymore, but you offer not evidence to support this claim, nor do you support the conclusion that they remain loyal to their own country.

However, if you are happy to live and let live and primarily respond here to people who attack disbelief, or to point out the weakness of an argument made by a religionist, you are not necessarily an anti-theist.

There are two arguments one could make here.

Here is what I do nt get about either side... they make an argument for something, but then are completely unable to apply it to other scenarios.

The argument could be made that this overhead is used to spread the Word through the church, but are churches really that efficient in building the Kingdom of God here on earth?

And it's here that argument often grinds to an embarrassed halt: Our national allegiance to individual freedom makes a negative response seem narrow, even cruel.

But alot of the people on here making that argument are defending the republicans.

And we have number 8 from my top ten list of the most irritatingly stupid «arguments» that religionists make here.

Before we get into the argument at all it is necessary to make clear in what sense the term imagination is here used.

What is happening here is a mashing together of texts to make the point about continuity between the then and now - the now, of course, related to those Christians who are in agreement with the arguments of Cyprian.

But that is beside the point — the whole argument to be made here is that Christianity and its messengers both try to differentiate themselves from the rest when, in truth, they really are no different.

That's a rather hypocritical argument you're making here.

It's not clear what you've demonstrated here other than a lack of knowledge and a lack of understanding about how arguments are made.

Here enters the second caveat about the rule that public arguments be made in a way that is publicly accessible.

I would make the argument that your average insane theist (pick your poison here) is more dangerous than your average insane atheist.

understand, the same argument made here, was made about other shows: whether Duck Dynasty or even Ellen Degeneres.

Judas Iscariot and the Myth of Jewish Evil by Hyam Maccoby Free Press, 213 pages, $ 22.95 Maccoby is noted, or notorious, for his argument, made here once again, that anti-Semitism is inherent in Christian faith.

Grace's chapter on submission will make egalitarians cringe, but it would take too long to dissect all her arguments here.

You make several unsubstantiated declarative statements here which really do nothing for your argument.

And boy does Gerry love number ten on the list of the top thirteen most irritatingly stupid arguments religionists make here:

Here's my list of the top ten most irritatingly stupid «arguments» that religionists make hHere's my list of the top ten most irritatingly stupid «arguments» that religionists make herehere.

And perennially at number one on my top 10 list of the most irritatingly stupid «arguments» that religionists make here.

Since our conversation yesterday looked at Matthew Vines» argument that lifelong celibacy is not biblically mandated for gay and lesbian Christians, I wanted to make space here for another perspective.

So based on your argument, Professor King, it is no coincidence that some of the strongest arguments about the potential damage of this Coles pricing policy have been made by other milk processors, given that you outline that milk processors are probably the ones at the greatest risk here of losing profit margin?

We're not handing out career awards here, though, so we'll have to make the argument that Trout is the best choice for 2016.

Yet I'm here to make an argument that it's a big, amorphous blob at the bottom of championship - drought gulch.

People on here were making the argument of where Reus could really go, and came to the conclusion that there aren't really and top clubs in the market for a LW.

Carter having come in for a visit means there's at least some interest and you made good arguments for bringing him here.

Here's the thing: you could make a good argument that the Oklahoma City Thunder lost the 2012 NBA Finals the same way the Miami Heat lost the 2011 Finals.