Sentences with phrase «make argument using»

The SRL usually is not versed in legalese and when they tell the facts or make argument using everyday language that says the exact same thing the legalese says the judges pretend not to understand (in some cases they actually may not understand, I find them often very unaware of basic legal principles) so they take the easy and safest way out by saying the one word that works for them - dismissed.

To be met with a derisive «Make your argument using a few fancy words and numbers and equations» (as in the comment to which this is a reply) reinforces the question of whether the conversation is about science at all.

The dismissive «make your argument using a few fancy words and numbers and equations» hardly serves to increase confidence.

Make your argument using a few fancy words and numbers and equations, and lace it heavily with snark, attacks and other distractions, so nobody can actually understand your argument.

Covering an article from OKCupid that makes an argument using statistics that suggests men should consider dating older women.

Not exact matches

First, make sure the «when in Rome» argument isn't just being used as a fig leaf to cover up what is really an appeal to convenience.

I've looked previously at some of the arguments made by the housing bears, for example in «Housing crash predictions using wrong indicators.»

They loved our central argument, but couldn't we reorganize things somehow to make information easier to use?

«Be truthful and use previous experience to make the argument as to why you're the right fit for the role,» she says.

However, on the other hand, the argument could be made that parodies in the adult context would qualify for a fair use defense, as with other parodies.

Byron Fitzgerald, Manager of the Litigation Section of the CBSA would later characterize the argument made by Finance and the Conservative Party that iPods could come into the country tariff free under 9948 using end use certificates is «perpetuating a fraud»:

You could describe this as social media with training wheels, and make the argument that it's helpful for kids to learn to use social media under the eye of an adult.

Using the savings from those benefits to reinvest in American business — of all sizes — through reduction in taxes (and, since we're making the argument, reducing some of the regulatory burden to boot) would help business owners to grow their operations, increase sales and, yes, hire workers.

Price had made numerous similar arguments prior to that interview and used his time leading HHS to weaken enforcement of Obamacare's individual mandate through his administrative powers.

But if they're already using - or more likely under - using - Office 365, then Microsoft is going to make a very compelling argument to do just that in the future.

Moynihan makes the argument against using the idea of not taxing an amount of income as something equivalent to an expenditure.

The one major point in favor of your argument that you didn't highlight is that most people using a Roth IRA assume that they'll make more money in the future than they do today, thus realizing a lower tax rate by paying taxes now than they would have in the future (even assuming tax rates stay constant).

Enge's arguments for «why» choose this strategy make complete sense, since the end goal is to build a website presence in authority locations, using the most appropriate and recognized methods for building long term link authority.

[20] In essence, this was an early version of the conflict of interest argument made below: promoters were using nonvoting common stock as a way of maintaining voting control for themselves.

An argument, however, could be made that the USPS was losing billions before it expanded its service offerings for Amazon and would, still, likely lose billions if Amazon discontinued its use of the USPS tomorrow.»

Use data to drive better decision - making, because it trumps any arguments that are opinion - based or anecdotal.

A cornerstone of Lakshman Achuthan's argument is that four key indicators used by the NBER to make official recession calls are, as he put it, «rolling over.»

The arguments used by the Minister of State for Finance were not unlike those against the changes made at that time.

One of the things that may make Mr. Ham's arguments convincing for some is his use of other qualified scientists.

Maybe i will use use your previous statement given you made no argument only an accusation... perhaps» «The first refuge of the cornered fool.»

It would be equally unfair to use your belief that God is imaginary,» Using your god as the starting point makes your argument circular, hence worthless.

Therefore, to help someone come to this understanding — to help someone come to know the truth — one can not resort to violence but must make use of rational arguments that seek to persuade.

Lastly chad, when you quote someone the way you did, namely using it to bolster your argument, you give up the right to disown it because I make a good point that refutes the original statement.

He is particularly dismissive of arguments making use of the slippery slope, even as he unwittingly makes them credible.

@Chuckles «Lastly chad, when you quote someone the way you did, namely using it to bolster your argument, you give up the right to disown it because I make a good point that refutes the original statement.

using your argument we would had civil rights in this country just because goverments make certain practices illegal does tat mean that what the goverrmet s doing is moral and just, The fact s the goverment attempted to use Christaniaity to bolster it claim to power through this we have the start of the Roman Catholic Church one of the most insidious evil organzations on this planet which as doe more to oppose ad kill true follewers of Christ then ay group o this planet.

If what you're trying to use here is the ad hominem fallacy - attacking an argument by attacking the person making the argument - then the only people you'll convince with this tactic are those who haven't learned to think critically.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.

atheist like to use these verses quite often but the argument is ridiculous once you understand the point Jesus was making.

If you are going to deny this you are in denial of reality; and strange use of capitalization will not invalidate my argument or make you right.

You make a fallacious claim...no - one can possibly know with 100 % certainty if a god exists, so why bother using the God of The Gaps argument to explain away the unknown?

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.Hate against any group of people you dis - agree is still hate and is not tolerable in my opinion.

The argument you people use to make that case is hopelessly flawed.

Using the most extreme analogy possible in an argument usually produces nothing productive — it only makes the other side of the debate get more defensive and inflammatory.

Precisely to ensure constructive dialogue, the Church at all levels must always make use of those fully qualified in their scientific discipline when looking to engage in any scientific question, so as to inform the argument with clear and precise thinking.

Or do you believe the pharmacy must be forced to rehire the pharmacist, as the Christians demanded (using your very same argument) when this made news?

That ridiculous argument has been refuted over and over, and you ignorant anti-science boobs continue to use it as if it makes any kind of coherent sense.

The Wahhabi movement in Arabia was a reaction against the worship of saints, but it made use of force rather than arguments, and failed to establish a general reform.

I also want to add, that I only wrote twice... my husband used my laptop to make his argument about the Irvings... those are not my words.

However, as time is marching forward and scientific progress is being made, it is becoming harder and harder to use the God of the Gaps argument, as science «is» unquestionably «continuing» to fill in those gaps and answers.

Werner Jaeger, who has written the classic history of the idea of paideia, [2] pointed out in a later book on Early Christianity and Greek Paideia that Clement not only uses literary forms and types of argument calculated to sway people formed by paideia but, beyond that, he explicitly praises paideia in such a way as to make it clear that his entire epistle is to be taken «as an act of Christian education.»

(Indeed an argument could and should be made that He implicitly uses it of ALL human beings.)

Because of the «ism» at the end, making it appear as if it were an ideology, and the fact that they do not understand the definition of the word... and many seek to use a «false equivalency» in a bid to bolster their failed arguments, too.

Cal, they are trying to show atheists to be hypocrites and think it is easier to try to use the cry of «hypocrite» instead of making an actual argument because they do not have any arguments that can not be torn down.

If this is your own argument, I suggest that you learn a little more math before you try to use it to make a point.