Sentences with phrase «make arguments on all sides»

We're making arguments on both sides.»

As far as hydrogen fuel cells versus electric cars or wind - powered land sailers, you can make arguments on all sides of the alternative fuel debate until you're blue in the face from too much CO2.

Not exact matches

On a side note, when I make this argument, sometimes people argue the point.

I'm sure arguments can be made on both sides of each.

«I believe it is a matter of fundamental fairness that the American people be allowed to see both sides of the argument and make their own judgment,» Schumer wrote in a letter to the president released on Sunday.

Legitimate, careful arguments can be made on both sides of the tenure question, but that's not Taylor's approach.

Regarding the Confederacy, I recently wrote a book on the last major initiative in 1861 to avert the Civil War — the Washington Peace Conference — where both sides extensively made their arguments.

The BBC's online article, and the brief accompanying video that was presumably aired on the network, were both a bit sketchy in their account of the arguments made by the two sides.

Fortunately, crack pots on either side of the extreme make it easy to shoot down their arguments, because they don't have many valid arguments.

The only argument that makes sense for Christians is to claim that God, working with believing players to give them the courage to be better ones on both sides of every game, ultimately makes the game a better one, and more entertaining.

There are arguments that can be made on both sides of the abortion argument.

Astronomers on all sides made scriptural and theological arguments to support their ideas.

That is a big assumption on your part since you nor anyone has ever provided evedince that God does not exist, and spare me the argument that the burden of proof lies with the believer because both sides are making a definative claim.

And if you stand on either side of the theological debate, then you should be aware of his arguments for the existence of God before you make any stance that is antagonistic to the existence of God.

Peter Abelard's seminal work, Sic et non, which quoted Church Fathers on both sides of a series of theological questions, set the tone for the Questions genre of the Middle Ages, The writer set out a Question, stated the best arguments on both sides (thesis and antitheses), made a determination (synthesis), and then rebutted each of the antitheses in detail.

What Ryan Anderson is «peddling» is an argument, supported by evidence, that makes people on the other side squirm.

On the far side of the older argument over the compatibility of Catholicism and democracy, this book seeks to convince us that the principles and practices of the free society are made necessary by Catholic teaching.

It's one thing to offer an argument that should only convince those who are already on your side but is a little deceptive because it makes an emotional appeal that isn't really all that rational on pro-life premises.

While the recent form of the Under - 21s side might be a strong argument against that with a group of talented young players on show, the point he makes about the Italian, Spanish and French leagues providing an obvious spine of homegrown players in their respective All - Star teams is true.

You could make the argument that it might have been defensive holding, but there is no PI on either side behind the LOS.

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

On the other side of the argument, industry leaders have been attempting to make the sport safer, and criticisms have been raised about the methods used to determine risk and to make comparisons to other contact sports.

Although great arguments can be made on both sides, all parents agree that a good night's sleep is the ultimate goal.

My point is that this issue is not nearly as black or white as supporters on either side would have us believe; there are valid arguments to be made for eliminating flavored milk from school lunches and for continuing to offer that choice.

On the opposite side was Syracuse senator and state senate Finance Chair John DeFrancisco who made the argument that taxing the rich was not the best solution.

The executive director of the Working Families Party, Bill Lipton, is staying neutral, saying the 232 committee members will «carefully evaluate the arguments on both sides» and make the decision that's best for the state's working families.

The final argument on the merits may be made by two persons on each side.

«Like his constituents, he only has one vote, and he very much sees his role as ensuring that both sides of the argument are put to the people of Plymouth to enable all to make an informed decision on this very important matter,» says an aide.

Hundreds of documents have now been filed by both sides, and after hearing these oral arguments on key points of contention, the judges are expected to make a ruling that could divide the intellectual property, give it all to one side, or even decide that neither party deserves the patents.

The article describes some of the legal maneuvering and arguments that may be made on both sides of the issue.

There's a pair of back - to - back twists that alter our perspective on one of the characters, making one side of the argument look dishonest (The lie is only about a single specific; the validity of the complaint is still present) before confirming that the other is even worse (In putting forward evidence against their cause, they're not too intelligent, either, but fortunately for them, no one notices).

[7] There are theoretical arguments to be made on both sides of this issue.

On the latter, for example, they note disagreement between Paul Hill and Robin Lake, colleagues within the Center on Reinventing Public Education, but they demur on taking a side themselves, declaring, «From where we sit, they both make compelling arguments.&raquOn the latter, for example, they note disagreement between Paul Hill and Robin Lake, colleagues within the Center on Reinventing Public Education, but they demur on taking a side themselves, declaring, «From where we sit, they both make compelling arguments.&raquon Reinventing Public Education, but they demur on taking a side themselves, declaring, «From where we sit, they both make compelling arguments.&raquon taking a side themselves, declaring, «From where we sit, they both make compelling arguments.»

They include one of the most volatile, protracted arguments you'll see on the matter, incidentally making me think there's something to Disqus CEO Daniel Ha's assertion in Four ways web comments will change that «readers are spending most of their time on the south side of web pages.

The basic assumption with all things Amazon is that we have no choice but to shop or publish with Amazon, an argument that makes its proponents look a little on the ridiculous side.

On the other side, argumentative research paper is a challenging task because you have to explore both sides of the argument and make sure that you have enough resources to protect your position.

The Guardian explained how «Tor rips up the rulebook on digital rights management» and the BBC featured a long article with arguments from both sides, drawing links with the music industry's experience of the transition and highlighting that «the key difference with the music business is that the book trade can see what mistakes the record labels made and avoid them.»

However, while there is no scientific evidence to support most of the claims made on either side of the argument, knowing that dog e-collars cause distress in pet dogs may be enough to seek alternative methods.

The 1080p argument still makes me laugh from certain fanboys on each side.

Multiple narrative voices bring these characters to life, allowing players to switch perspectives, and even make different choices based on what side of the arguments they fall on.

It's in that way that as childish as the argument is, there's a certain logic behind it all: With a belief that there must be a winner and a loser, it goes beyond not wanting to be on the losing side, but straight into the fact that by making your side lose, the opposition is thereby threatening the continued existence of that which you enjoy.

The art of persuasion is of course necessary to winning any argument, but make sure you have real, physical, incontrovertible evidence on your side, not just clever words.

Or is Paul defending against the charge by making a numbers argument — the scientists in question are on the same side as the consensus, so to challenge any aspect of global warming science or politics is to make a statement about «the majority of scientists» (many of whom are in fact social scientists)?

I can see little point in making vague unquantifiable statements of the above kind, beyond establishing your position on one side or another of the argument.

I've seen several commentators make very intelligent arguments to that effect (and they've got some support in the case law, even though I come down on the other side)... but I've never seen it from Steyn himself.

If there is one comment that makes a strong argument on a particular point and many comments that argue the opposite side of that point with weak technical or purely emotional arguments who wins?

Why doesn't she trust the arguments made from the «other side» — when she can't actually evaluate the merits of those arguments based on understanding or knowledge of the science?

«I've seen Al Gore's film twice, but I've also read Michael Crichton's State of Fear, which makes a compelling case on the other side,» says Hug, referring to the controversial 2004 novel in which Crichton — using scientific arguments that were hotly challenged by critics — ridiculed the global - warming consensus as the work of conspiratorial alarmists.

The proposal tries to make this interpretation seem black - and - white but, as the Obama EPA showed, there are powerful arguments on the other side.

Given that people on Brulle's side of the Global Warming / Climate Change argument have been making false claims for decades — for example, that New York and Washington would be under water by the year 20004 — and given that the mass media sound daily alarms about the climate threat, the statement in the National Research Council report that «some» information sources are «affected» by campaigns opposed to policies that would limit carbon dioxide emissions is scant foundation for believing a massive conspiracy exists.5