No, you can not
make blanket claims about any group of people.
While it may seem cynical to
make the blanket claim that no institution can be trusted, one need only research the history of financial crises to understand why.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately, your bold -
blanket statements
make you sound somewhat ignorant and thus is contrary to what you
claim... less is more sometimes.
Blanket statements, such as, «There is simply no scientific research to back up these
claims,» are easily
made.
And although
making claims wasn't easy (especially in Thailand, when onward travel tickets were cancelled and re-issued, visas extended, and a myriad of both out - patient and in - patient expenses incurred), we were happy to have the security
blanket of insurance protecting us against these unforeseen emergencies.
It
makes all the difference — they have excised beam heat from the Sun to create the «Greenhouse Effect», they are fraudulently using real measurements of heat from the Sun
claiming these are from «backradiation /
blanketing of upwelling heat by greenhouse gases».
Even if AGW use the unsubstantiated
claim that CO2 stays in the atmosphere accumulating for hundreds and even thousands of years, take your pick, they
make up the numbers to suit, and double current amounts actually stayed in the atmosphere, this would be nonsense as «insulating
blanket» to not only stop heat loss globally but raise the global temperature of the Earth.
Making broad and general
claims to all forms of privilege, or as the court put it, attempting to «throw a privilege
blanket» over the materials gathered without any particulars will not be enough.
Presumably The Star is smart enough not to
claim that anonymity is good at all times for all purposes — but
blanket anoymity
makes The Star's job easier... in a way.
Advising a financial services firm on
making blanket notifications to insurers of potential
claims arising out of alleged mis - selling.