The sentence «You can't sue me» probably goes against a fundamental right that you can not forfeit, but why can't they simply put «By agreeing, you forfeit your right to
make any claims against this company» or, more formal, «We are not liable for anything, related to the product you bought, or otherwise» in their disclaimer?
Not exact matches
A 2015 indictment
against Dallas
company USPlabs, which
makes OxyElite Pro, accused the
company of falsely
claiming that its product was
made of natural plant extracts.
Alcoa had voluntarily shut - off the plant's burner in 2002 after a number of multi-million dollar compensation
claims were
made against the
company by workers relating to adverse health effects.
The corporate watchdog has begun civil penalty proceedings
against Padbury Mining and two of its directors over statements
made last year
claiming the
company had lined up $ 6 billion in equity to fund construction of a port and rail network at Oakajee north of Geraldton.
In 2014, 70 prominent scientists published an open letter pushing back
against the marketing
claims made by
companies like Lumosity.
Each
company seems to be going back and forth,
making claims against their rival app
company in what appears to be the first major public spat between the ride - sharing apps.
Mr Huddy said he did not know who would
make such a
claim against CDI, which was selling infant formula to China through Great Wall Capital Trading, a Hong Kong based wholesale import and distribution
company.
In 2004 the Canadian Food Inspection Agency warned Mead Johnson
against making similar
claims in its ads in Canada, however the
company and its rivals continue to state that its formula can enhance brain and eye development.
Questions - Getting value for money from
companies marketing services to help people
make claims against missold Payment Protection Insurance Legislation, revising the system for electing British Members of the European Parliament, dealing with any consequences for social cohesion and criminality of the withdrawal of civil legal aid for social welfare law cases, annual value of employers» national insurance contributions Legislation - Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill
We deeply regret the use of our platform to
make the unverified
claims against Mr. Awuah - Darko who was the Chief Executive of the Bulk Oil Storage and Transport
Company.
It said, «We deeply regret the use of our platform to
make the unverified
claims against Mr. Awuah - Darko who was the Chief Executive of the Bulk Oil Storage and Transport
Company», adding «We wish to unreservedly retract the
claims and apologise to Mr Awua - Darko for any inconvenience caused».
It also must disclose any
claims or findings
made against the
company during the period it is receiving IDA tax breaks.
Most vanity publishers
make very similar
claims and of the 100 + files on such
companies that I have, only a small proportion have complaints presently laid
against them.
«If somebody
makes a
claim against you, saying you owe them money, or a debt collection
company claims that you owe money on an alleged debt; you have the legal right for them to prove their accusation.
It's in the insurance
company's best interest, your best interest, and the best interest of all policyholders to
make sure that any liability
claim against a policy is properly defended.
If a
claim is
made or a suit is filed
against you, the insurance
company pays for the lawyer.
The insurance
company will pay for a lawyer to defend you when a liability
claim is
made against you.
where do we get case laws 0r judgements
made by IRDA
against rejected
claims by insurance
companies during 2011 to 2015 in detail?
A footnote to the 10Q defines them as follows «DGCL 281 (b) requires the
Company to pay or make reasonable provision for the payment of all claims and obligations (including all contingent, conditional or unmatured contractual claims), claims that are subject to pending actions, suits or proceedings against the company and claims that have not arisen or been made known to the Company but are likely to arise or become known within 10 years of dissolution.
Company to pay or
make reasonable provision for the payment of all
claims and obligations (including all contingent, conditional or unmatured contractual
claims),
claims that are subject to pending actions, suits or proceedings
against the
company and claims that have not arisen or been made known to the Company but are likely to arise or become known within 10 years of dissolution.
company and
claims that have not arisen or been
made known to the
Company but are likely to arise or become known within 10 years of dissolution.
Company but are likely to arise or become known within 10 years of dissolution.»
So don't bother, simply
make a
claim directly
against the card
company.
On the other hand, if you let them
make a renters insurance liability
claim against you, their act of cashing the check from the insurance
company generally waives future
claims or extensions of
claims against you.
Pursuant to the Plan, the
Company is also authorized to dispose of its remaining non-cash assets, on such terms and at such prices as the
Company's board of directors, without further shareholder approval, may determine to be in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders, to pay or
make reasonable provision to pay all
claims against and obligations of the
Company, to
make such provisions as will be reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for any
claim against the
Company which is the subject of a pending action, suit or proceeding to which the
Company is a party, to distribute on a pro rata basis to the shareholders of the
Company the remaining assets of the
Company, and, subject to statutory limitations, to take all other actions necessary to wind up and liquidate the
Company's business and affairs.
In addition to
Claims brought by either you or the Bank,
Claims made by or
against the Bank or by or
against anyone connected with you or the Bank or
claiming through you or the Bank (including a second cardholder, employee, agent, representative, affiliated
company, predecessor or successor, heir, assignee, or trustee in bankruptcy) shall be subject to arbitration as described herein.
Pet owner Frank Lucido has filed a class - action lawsuit in California
against Nestle Purina PetCare
Company,
claiming that Beneful contains toxins have
made thousands of dogs sick or even resulted in death.
Pet owner Frank Lucido has filed a class - action lawsuit in California
against Nestle Purina PetCare
Company,
claiming that Beneful contains toxins have
made thousands of dogs sick or even resulted...
A judge recently ruled
against the
company in one case, saying Warren «fraudulently induced» the family into a contract,
making misrepresentations about the dog's abilities, which the court record
claimed should instinctively be ready to alert.
* Here is that hearing that took place, it's lengthy but first the
claims are
made, the panels give their respective views based on their background and relation to the industry and where they see it going followed by Sega (represented by Bill White) and Nintendo's Howard Lincoln answering the challenges and facing off
against each other, challenging each
companies approach to the industry, worth a watch, history in the
making ~ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nD-Afpg4P2U
You will notice if you look at the websites of
companies which sell masks that they rarely
make any quantified
claims about effectiveness, and some never explicitly
claim to protect you
against pollution at all.
However,
companies continue to
make novel arguments around unauthorized access,
claiming that a bot scraping their site
against their wishes should count as a violation of the CFAA,
making it a felony.
Contrary to the Stockholm District Court, the Svea Court of Appeal found that the arbitral tribunal lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the
claim made by Spanish investors
against the Russian Federation originating from the alleged expropriation of the Spanish investor's investments in Yukos Oil
Company.
Jack's insurance
company wrongly decided that he had no coverage for the
claim made against him.
The earlier you seek advice from us the better chance we have of negotiating a resolution that satisfies all parties, however if this is not the case we will ensure that the correct process is followed to minimalise the chance of
claims being
made against the
company.
Obtained arbitration award for a large Internet
company against an overreaching landlord which had
made claims related to the lease of client's primary office.
The figure was then utilized by us as part of the
claim we
made against the insurance
company.
Involved a dispute over the application of the rule
against recovery by a shareholder of reflective loss, and a double derivative
claim made in respect of a Cayman
company with a BVI parent.
The answer may be one of two things: 1) Your employer may not be aware of the difference between the two types of benefits OR 2) Your employer could be trying to pull the wool over your eyes — by having you
make a
claim under your personal STD policy (remember YOU pay for this and it is usually much less money and no medical benefits), instead of filing a
claim for workers» compensation benefits
against the
company's insurance policy (the policy the employer pays for) it saves the
company money (filing a
claim will increase their premiums).
In any case, our research shows that as the prevalence of
claims increases, it poses a higher risk to the stability of SMEs and
companies need to
make sure that they are adequately protected
against them.
Attorney Perrault
made claims against both the supermarket, and the
company which serviced the pneumatic dock plates.
Acting for three individuals in defence of a # 40m
claim made against them in the Commercial Court for deceit, conspiracy to deceive and breach of fiduciary duties in connection to their successful management buy - out of a technology
company.
We take into consideration costs associated with surgery, hospitalization, physical therapy, medical equipment, in ‐ home nursing, and lost wages before
making claims against the people and insurance
companies that are involved in your case.
Not - for - profit campaign group, the Association of Personal Lawyers (APIL), has criticised proposed new rules on how insurance
companies search their historical records if a potential
claim for compensation is being
made against them, saying that they are «wide of the mark».
Sometimes you may have to file a lawsuit
against the uninsured motorist and obtain a decree
against the uninsured motorist before
making a
claim with the insurance
company.
Ryan also represents employees who are not members of trade unions in employment law matters and litigates disability
claims made by employees
against insurance
companies.
When an insurance
company fails to protect the interests of its insured, tort victims
making a
claim against the insured may have the opportunity to recover in excess of the insurer's policy limits.
It should be noted that the SFO has repeatedly and publicly criticised the tendency for
companies to
claim privilege over the accounts of witnesses,
making clear in relation to DPAs that it views the «free supply of relevant information», including «the account of any witnesses spoken to by those conducting the enquiry» to be «the hallmark of cooperation».10 This approach is also codified in the DPA Code of Practice, which states that the SFO will take into account whether a
company has disclosed relevant witness accounts as a public interest factor tending
against a prosecution.
Settlement, $ 1.53 Million Breach of contract
claim against insurance
company for failure to
make payment on Commercial Crime Policy.
Alison Wilson Qualified: 2005
Made partner: 2014 Key cases: Advising a major bank on an FCA investigation into its handling of PPI complaints; advising Standard Chartered Bank in its successful
claim against the Ceylon Petroleum
Company in connection with oil derivatives; advising a major bank on a multijurisdictional fraud perpetrated
against it by a hedge fund manager, including civil
claims and associated criminal investigations.
If you are injured from a motor vehicle accident in New York, and
make a
claim for No Fault benefits through your own insurance
company or
against the driver who caused the accident, the insurance
company has the right to have you examined by a doctor of its choice.
Our client denied the
claim in its entirety and had reason to believe that the
company would be unable to meet any costs order
made against it.
Altus» allegations
against Gordon included
claims that he «talked of senior personnel in the
company in very derogatory terms and that he swore considerably to the point that it
made working with him unbearable.»