Sentences with phrase «make claims experience»

We're here to guide you through the process and help make your claims experience as smooth and stress - free as possible.

Ignoring the recommendations of the Expert Panel on Occupational Health & Safety and the Arthurs Report, the Proposed Rate Framework would make claims experience the main driver of premium rates for all Schedule I employers.

We're here to guide you through the process and help make your claims experience as smooth and stress - free as possible.

Not exact matches

Let them know you're seeking their sincere testimonials to qualify and lend value to the claims you make on LinkedIn about your career experience, skill sets and specialties.

Within this time, Sloan said that she saw and experienced similar claims that were made public in recent days, after allegations of sexual misconduct began to emerge.

I wasn't sure if the new «butterfly» mechanism, which claims to make the keyboard more stable, was going to provide for a smooth typing experience.

If you want to convey your dedication or motivation, share an example from your past work experience; examples will go much further to making your claims believable.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg last week called the claim Facebook skewed the election «a pretty crazy idea,» adding that «voters make decisions based on their lived experience.»

That made be true, but I don't see how that validates your claim that Canada has experienced 35 years of continuous tax cuts.

After all, most of these firms make similar promises and have similar service offerings; they might all claim to have the same levels of expertise or experience with your industry.

The features and experiences offered by this broker are also worth trying out before making uninformed decisions based on unfounded claims or rumors that the site is a scam.

(It always makes me laugh to hear biblical literalists shut the door on experience outright in their claims that revelation has ceased.

Chad «no... A posteriori justification makes reference to experience; but the issue concerns how one knows the proposition or claim in question — what justifies or grounds one's belief in it That that the universe had a beginning is the most common cosmological belief held today, I am clearly on solid ground making that claim.

Genesis 1:1... «in the beginning, God...» John 3:16... «For God so loved... «I'm Blind, but now I see...» your personal experience confirms nothing... the patients on the psych unit of my hospital are filled with some amazing claims... just as the Muslim, the Jew, the Buddhist, the Rastafarian make claims of their experience...

One of the most persistent mistakes made by critics of the crop of celibate gay Christian writers that came together around the blog Spiritual Friendship is the assumption that when we use any language that they don't like (most commonly, though not limited to, the word «gay») to describe our experiences, we are using that language to make ontological claims.

(continued from 6/1/09) As little inclined as is Charles Taylor to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, he can not finally avoid making certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are: We all see....

This, of course, is not to say he is not rightly esteemed truly human, a man of flesh and blood with the peculiar Biblical force of that phrase; indeed it might be claimed that the very stress laid on the limited character of his experience makes us more vividly aware of the reality of his human nature.

A theology of women's experience may not make quite so radical a claim.

I'm not sure why some people are making such an issue of this vs. her message and experience, which she claims to be an over-all positive one.

However, Whitehead uses the experience of CE as evidenced for an objective claim, so it seems as if he is making an objective claim about it, and hence it could be erroneous, since there could be a difference between «seems» and «is.»

Frei claimed not only to have identified the distortion but to have explained it: theologians have begun with contemporary human experience and tried to make connections with the biblical message.

As Ross points out, «Whitehead's examples of causal efficacy in conscious experience are a light flash and the agent's claim that «the flash made me blink» (PR 175).

Even those who can claim to have had direct, personal experience of the divine must somehow interact with persons who can not make or even understand such a claim.

The «experience of having a cat perception of a suitable sort» — exactly because it is a cognitively significant experience — at once and concurrently constitutes the cause of X's claiming that «The cat is on the mat» and affords X with a reason for making this claim.

Alison Inglis - Jones responds to the claim made Conservative candidate Dominic Raab that foodbank users are not experiencing poverty but short... More

In their New Age Journal report, «Beverly Hills Shaman» (March - April 1989), they acknowledge that in February Carson and his attorney unexpectedly indicated their intention to drop the suit, and they document that prior to that action Carson had made claims suggesting that many of Andrews «s experiences were the results of his own creative imagination.

Such a vision may indeed be open to the future, but it strongly discounts sequential or developmental tracts of experience, since it claims that the effort to relate moments to each other makes them objects which one strives to control.

Whitehead also makes it explicitly clear in this context that the joint adoption of the subjectivist bias and of the substance - quality categories is inconsistent: «Yet if the enjoyment of experience be the constitutive subjective fact, these categories have lost all claim to any fundamental character in metaphysics» (PR 241; cf. 243).

On the other end of the spectrum, revisionists like Paul Tillich and Hans Küng claimed that dogmas and propositions are expressions of religious experiences or spiritual intuitions, alerting us to an encounter with God that goes beyond all formulas or man - made intellectual systems.

Our claim that we know God directly in experience can be made without presuming that this knowledge is easily had, or ever more than dimly possessed.

Consequently, if Hartshorne's argument is successful, it is only because it makes the other and much stronger claim that each of us in every moment is not only dimly aware of God but also thinks or knows God as eminently experiencing subject.

This reality makes us aware that every narrow definition of Christian doctrinal certainty will finally have to be abandoned; every claim by any branch of the Christian church to be the true church or the only church will ultimately have to be sacrificed; every doctrine of infallibility — whether of the papacy, or of the Scriptures, or of any sacred tradition, or of any individual experience — will inevitably have to be forgotten.

The horrors experienced by some six million Jews and others in the Holocaust simply shattered all conventional claims that God will somehow «make it all right» in the end.

In either case a claim for experience is being made, whether at the historical or the redactional level: that religiousness can be a social neurosis which blocks the healing of others and oneself, and that its resistance to healing arises from the splitting - off and repression in oneself and in society of what is unacceptable to consciousness (hence the role of forgiveness in the story).

Nevertheless, as little inclined as he is to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, the religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, Taylor can not avoid make certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are.

Paul found this an important criterion, for he had to contend with all sorts of claims made in the name of religious experience (I Corinthians 12 - 14).

On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.

By faith however, I do seem to experience a kind of «certainty» or confidence but it is contingent on a whole matrix of relationships in progress and so while I can be passionate about the meaning I am making about those relationships, those relationships are always outstripping my meanings (claims) and revealing more about what meaning is possible.

Houlden goes on to tell us that there is diversity in the reporting of how this impact occurred: yet he rejects the claim, sometimes made by highly skeptical scholars, «that no intelligible picture can emerge and no statement, of greater or lesser probability, concerning the Jesus whose impact those who gave the early witness experienced, can be made» (p. 134).

My criticisms of the book amount in the end to the claim that Hartshorne's philosophy, in its complete form, does not capture the living waters of experience, and that the reason it does not do so is that its categoreal scheme makes most of experience philosophically uninteresting.

You may not be bat shit crazy but you are a liar - no medical test would have proven that you left your body or experienced god considering many have made your claim and no - one has been shown to be correct or the world would be well aware of it.

In the experience of morality we are awareof a claim made upon our consciences to do the good, whatever the cost, even if our lives have to be forfeited.

3 The obvious critical point to make of Whitehead here is to indicate that his statement that science is true for each percipient is to claim to know something of the experience, qua scientific, of each percipient, and hence to have admitted an element of transcendence into the very statement of the problem.

But because experience at its base is non-cognitive, the claims we make, in theology as elsewhere, must also be tested in terms of their consequences.

Whether those who experienced this interpreted it first as a Jesus raised by God or as a Jesus exalted by God, in either case this is to make a remarkable claim: Jesus, who was dead and buried, made himself known to them!

Camping, a degreed engineer (not a pastor) who claims to have made the Bible his «university» for more than 50 years, has experience with failed prophecies.

Popular restaurant chain Jimmy John's also experienced a lawsuit after 300 delivery drivers claimed they were made to pay for their own vehicle insurance, maintenance and work - related phone use — which was in violation of both the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Kansas Wage Payment Act.

Though I love nutritional yeast, I have to say that making the claim that it can replace the full rounded - out blissful flavor experience of a good parmesan regianno is a major stretch.

Latest reports from the Daily Star claim that Cech is 99 % sure that a transfer to Arsenal will go through — with the final 1 % down to whether Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich and manager Mourinho will allow the experienced goalkeeper to make the switch to their English rivals.

David's very real, not made up, completely reasonable deficiencies to be addressed... Complain about youth policy and promoting from within but then claim we should gut the squad of it's experienced heads and bring in Khedira and Cavani... Check!!