Sentences with phrase «make clear to scientists»

Good regulation, she says, can help to make clear to scientists what they can and can not do.

We understand this point was not made clear to the scientists who were asked to comment on the press release, who naturally commented on the fact that it left a great deal unsaid.

Not exact matches

Trump, who's never served, hews to a different standard, as he makes clear when he cites the speculation of «many people» as evidence his Democratic opponent's emails got a scientist killed.

With an opening statement «denial of evolution is unique to the United States» Bill makes it clear that he not only is a poor dresser and ineffective pop - scientist, but also an imbecile.

Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do... find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!

She does not tell us whether she has come to identify fully with this version of Christianity, but she makes clear that in this book she writes as a social scientist who in this role can not make statements about the ultimate validity of the Evangelical experience of God.

The inherently necessary borders of science could best be protected in the future if all scientists were to agree to draw a clear, careful, and inviolable line between scientific and philosophical / religious truth - that is, if they would conscientiously seek to avoid making purportedly scientific statements concerning questions whose answers lie beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.

The conversational style and clear explanations in Your Baby's Microbiome by some of the world's leading scientists and maternity care providers make this new and complex information accessible and inspiring to the general public.

«We owe the young scientists who are coming into the system, from the moment they start in a Ph.D. program until they finally get to the point that they're in faculty positions... a responsibility to give them clear information and good support in making effective, sound decisions that comport with their abilities and career aspirations,» Daniels said at a briefing on the report.

The last few months have made it clear to me that strong bonds between scientists and nonscientists are essential, but that we frequently get stuck in our own circles.

The study focuses on an area bordering the Sundarbans, a UNESCO World Heritage site made up of about 50 islands that, the scientists note, were cleared over time and embanked as part of an effort to boost food production.

Michael New, the NASA program scientist who ran the competition, says that Venus scientists need a clearer consensus on their goals and the measurements that they want to make.

«Once you become a businessman, as a scientist you make it very difficult for yourself to take clear, ethical decisions.»

The team makes it clear that it thinks its approach is superior to one reported last month in Nature by scientists at Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) in California — deriving an ES cell line from a single cell taken from a morula (ScienceNOW 23 August).

In 1972, scientists reported seeing something similar to the clearest patterns, so - called «transform faults» that make staircase - shaped cracks, by stretching a tray of melted wax that was hardened gradually by a fan.

Johns Hopkins University scientist Kirby Runyon wants to make one thing clear: Regardless of what one prestigious scientific organization says to the contrary, Pluto is a planet.

The responses to this year's survey make it clear that helping patients, doing important science, and maybe even changing the world are important to scientists working in biopharma.

AS Argentinian scientists in Antarctica last week raced to clear an 80 000 - litre spill of fuel oil before the summer thaw, international negotiators failed again to reach agreement on making polluters on the icy continent liable in law for cleaning up their messes.

There is a bowknot for every occasion that a scientist is likely to encounter, including one for celebrating publications that has the titles of famous journals all over it; a golden one «for golden moments»; a transparent bow tie for «a clear statement of a question»; and one made from a banknote, for «when in financial need.»

In any laboratory, a good lab notebook makes the data completely clear and provides enough information about your experimental technique to allow another trained scientist to reproduce your work, even years from now.

He advised scientists similarly to make sure their points are very clear and to avoid giving climate deniers an opportunity to extract a phrase from ones communications or answers to questions that fits an anti-science theme.

It was still not clear as New Scientist went to press whether more than a week of efforts by the Italian and US forces had made any difference at all.

This top - down approach stifles innovation and makes clear to everyone that the connections with bureaucrats and a few powerful scientists are paramount, dictating the entire process of guideline preparation.

But the researchers» work helps to make sense of the noisiness in climate data and helps scientists gain a clearer picture of the future of water, especially in the mountainous west.

The scientists note that having a clear understanding of what makes humans different from our closest living relatives might lead to new breakthroughs or understandings of human health.

But I think one of the things that scientists and other people concerned about science education in the country need to do is make it clear to publishers that as citizens and voters, wherever they live, whatever state or town that they live [in], they will make sure that their elected officials know that textbook X, Y or Z is not to be used in this district because of its bad science.

Because international terrorists have made it clear they plan to use every possible weapon against their chosen enemies, nations» military and intelligence authorities are now more eager than ever to enlist the talents of scientists and engineers to counter these threats.

The papers also make clear that the kind of experimental sexual orientation research that scientists conduct with animals would be unethical if done with humans and thus the question of how the animal research generalizes to humans is an open question, one that may never be completely resolved.

For that reason, it will be important for scientists to make clear to the press and public the preliminary status of research found on ESSOAr or EarthArXiv, Hanson says.

Goodman claims that modern humans evolved (or that scientists think they did; it's hard to say which) in the space of 5000 years, but he never makes clear when this supposedly happened, and what the before and after points of the transition were.

Especially ironic when our physical responses to stress, such as an increase in cortisol, make it especially difficult to lose weight; in fact, scientists note there's a clear link between high stress and a larger midsection.

The first thing I want to make clear when you look at «Mad Scientist Muscle» is that this actually IS a serious program and a seriously GOOD program.

And if Foster and his colleagues were being either intellectually honest or good scientists, they'd have defined the two diets to make this clear.

As this stirring introduction to Jane Goodall's life and work makes clear, the scientist's passionate love of nature began in early childhood, when she «watched ALL the animals in her world, big and small — earthworms, insects, birds, cats, dogs, and horses.»

Although there is no clear - cut job description for an ornithologist, there are careers for bird lovers in a variety of professional areas, and the study of birds offers numerous opportunities for citizen and amateur scientists to make new discoveries and contributions.

Despite his evident lack of skill to evaluate the multiple lines of evidence accumulated by 2 centuries of climate science, DDS has made it clear he believes the lopsided consensus of working climate scientists is «alarmist».

Scientists should embrace the open scientific debate, and anyone who challenges that should be made very, very clear that without open debate, there simply is no science, no matter how much one is in favor of or opposes to particular people, statements and actions.

To do so, it is absolutely essential that when you comment on things, you make it 100 % clear when you are commenting as a scientist speaking from your area of expertise, and when you are commenting as somebody who is perhaps knowledgeable but not expert.

A brief perusal of the literature should make it clear that a great many climate scientists have accepted the hiatus as real, and as a problem, and a great many hypotheses have been published in various efforts to account for it (including a paper Tamino wrote with Stefan Rahmstorf, as I'm sure you are all aware).

This is especially true with research about cetaceans, because the discoveries of marine mammal scientists over the last 50 years have made it clear that whales and dolphins share traits once believed to be unique to humans: self - awareness, abstract thought, the ability to solve problems by planning ahead, understanding such linguistically sophisticated concepts as syntax, and the formation of cultural communities.

In any case, it seems important for scientists to make clear that our political statements are in our roles as ordinary people, not in our role as climate scientists.

Unfortunately, the tough scientific work to clarify ice and sea trends and dynamics has largely been obscured online by coverage focused on an error on Greenland ice loss that many polar scientists say made it into the new edition of the Times Comprehensive Atlas of the World (that's the British Times, just to be clear).

«As [Lindzen's] colleagues at MIT in the Program in Atmospheres, Oceans and Climate, all of whom are actively involved in understanding climate, we write to make it clear that this is not a view shared by us, or by the overwhelming majority of other scientists who have devoted their professional lives to careful study of climate science,» said the letter, signed by current and retired MIT professors.

Back to my original recommendation that scientists should steer clear of advocacy unless they are prepared to make sure that their advocacy is not irresponsible (see my previous post (Ir) responsible advocacy).

As the chart makes clear, if we want a high probability of staying below the 2 °C (3.6 °F) threshold, beyond which scientists project impacts rapidly shift from dangerous to catastrophic, we will have to adopt policies that are considerably more ambitious than Paris — and we need to do that as soon as possible.

Given it is a term that has been applied to failed politicians and railway engineers and a host of others who have had no formal acedmic training in the area, we can see that in pratice its far from clear what actually makes a person a climate scientists.

The scientists said the IPCC needs to make a number of structural changes, including producing more frequent and focused reports, increasing transparency and shifting some of its attention to hyper - local projections that would provide communities and their leaders a clearer picture of what their futures look like.

Blackburn cited two climate scientists to make her point: One who has been «wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades,» according to fellow environmental scientist Dana Nuccitelli, and another who recently said, «it's clear that adding more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere will warm the planet.»

Ethical scientist would make it clear that the normal standard for scientific publication is «extremely likely», and that other qualifiers are educated guesses that may assist policy maker, but fall short of traditional evidence needed to draw a scientific conclusion.

You make a clear point that scientists should not be expected to ignore the human implications of their findings.