Sentences with phrase «make comments on his thread»

Interesting, I made a comment on this thread back in November of 2011.

I'm arriving here late and to date, have made no comment on this thread except for this one.

Not exact matches

«And if I have chosen the wrong God, even though there is only one then its my eternity not yours» You are quite right but remember you started this post thread, not us, you were the first to make a comment on how the godless would spend eternity.

I'm going to make this my last comment on this thread, not because talking about this in the way this conversation has gone is upsetting for me but I just don't see the point of talking any more with the way it has gone.

I'll make this my last comment to you on this thread and leave you to say the last word to me if that is what you choose.

Therefore I will make this my last comment towards you on this thread and wish you well with recovery from any ill treatment you have received.

I have never commented on a thread like this, but I just had to say THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!!! I made these with frozen wild blueberries, and they satisfied my sweet / pancake tooth!

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

that's what it sounds like if you read comments here, and it makes me laugh because I've seen nearly identical threads about the same people on other team's sites.

I made similar comments on another thread; it really seems to be a mess with the season fast approaching, unprepared, I agree.

Justin, I don't find C - list and prouds comment on this particular thread any more snide and uncalled for then those made by several others.

I have never commented on a thread like this, but I just had to say THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!!! I made these with frozen wild blueberries, and they satisfied my sweet / pancake tooth!

Asking yes / no questions tends to lead to interview mode, and asking questions that don't pertain to your own life makes it hard for you to further comment on that particular thread.

Phantom Thread, as its writer - director made clear in comments after the film was shown to industry types in New York on November 26, is Anderson's idea of a love story.

Several times on this thread, MJL has made completely false and stereotypical comments about teacher training programs.

They dive - bomb forum threads, comment off - topic on blog posts and generally make a nuisance of themselves — and a bad name for indie authors in general.

Here is a comment about this article on another thread made by Angelo Anzalone, who owns a debt settlement company.

To discuss this update's new tweaks / features with other backers make sure to leave us a comment on the official forum thread.

Everything — literally everything — he learned about making games came from poring over pre-existing comment threads on forums and blogs until he found the solutions he needed to move forward.

I posted a version of this post on Facebook this morning, jumping up from breakfast after reading the New York Times article, and there has been a passionate response (I've made the Facebook post public so that the comments thread can be accessed by anyone who is on Facebook).

This post is a comment on Ray Ladbury's dismissal of the temperature pause, 157, since it failed to make it into the relevant IPCC report thread.

Regarding my promised reply to Lazar # 287 I will post at Bishophill on the Tamino thread — I am sure that any comments Lazar may wish to make there in response to my answers will be posted in full and received with great interest.

Perhaps you may find some value in my latest comment about what happened on Open Mind if it makes it through the mods in tack in the FR thread.

Comments that are «off - topic» should be made on an open thread (usually entitled «Unforced Variations»), and we may move OT comments to those Comments that are «off - topic» should be made on an open thread (usually entitled «Unforced Variations»), and we may move OT comments to those comments to those threads.

Can anyone share with me how one searches for a particular comment made by another on a previous thread?

(1) In response to Bob's comments, I did make on this thread essentially the same amended material freely available for download elsewhere, with numerous accompanying graphs AND ALSO Benny Peiser (quickly) published a similar article submitted by me in toto on CCNet.

I have a few comments on some of the recommendations made by Wegman that I will post on the road map thread (or if anyone suggests another more approprate thread for this, not about paleoproxies but the broader issues of review and accountability).

My comment is aimed not at making an ad nominee attack, but rather at an issue that bears on the fundamental quality, usefulness and credibility of these threads.

There are several thousand people who have shown up here that have made rather senseless and pointless comments, mostly on the Welcome and Heresy thread.

Why is it, that 97 % of seven year olds have no difficulty identifying the bottom data string as «bigger,» while opinion and professional engineering journal comment threads are loaded with folks who made it over the hump of Methods of Integration, and profess advanced degrees in quantitative disciplines, yet have emotionally dug in on the notion that those data demonstrate the absence of warming for those intervening 15 years?

It is Roy who either needs to make even just one comment on his own thread to either admit he's wrong, or prove all of us at PSI are wrong in some way, perhaps because the Second Law of Thermodynamics would not somehow lead to isentropic conditions, rather than isothermal in a vertical plane.

Thanks for making your 19th comment on this thread..

And simply claiming, as you did in # 304 above, that you are making changes to your presentation based on these comments isn't good enough — it's a breach of blog etiquette to say «you'll all get answers in X months when I publish my updated presentation» without answering the charges in the comment thread itself.

Here's a comment I made to a Gavin Cawley on the Mike Hulme «The Conversation» thread (emphasis added):

So why do you think that Judith does not come out and criticize McKitrick for his comment (I would think that by now she is aware of his having made that statement) or the abundant similar comments form «skeptics» on these past two threads?

Green Sand, It is certainly revealing that of all the comments on that thread (175 at the moment), I counted only two (perhaps three) which make a clear critique of the methods or data of the papers.

On a side note: Courtney's announcement he made in https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/10/28/manns-hockey-stick-disappears-and-crus-briffa-helps-make-the-mwp-live-again-by-pointing-out-bias-in-ther-data/#comment-1127600 to not respond to my comments in this thread anymore, was true only for as long.

I made some comments in response to you on a more recent thread.

Make your general comments on the Part II thread.

I made a comment on the other thread which I partially repeat below as it is relevant.

First, in asserting a non-zero lapse rate, your comment, which, as my comments weeks ago on Tallbloke's Talkshop indicate, I largely agree with, confirms the point I have been making: since Dr. Brown's explanation is based instead on the absence of any non-zero lapse rate whatsoever, no matter how small, it does not merit the non-critical gushing with which this thread is redolent.

There are two comments, however, I'd like to make after reading the posts on this thread.

Gary, please withdraw your untrue allegation made on the other thread that I had altered comments to make you look foolish.

The «Share» command in Safari makes it easy to email links to posts on WUWT to friends and relatives, but I know most don't have the time to spend studying long, often intricate arguments, and references to people they never heard of, not to mention reading lengthy Comments threads.

Also the ongoing back and forth with Tom P keeps this thread current in Recent Comments and makes clicking on it easier.

Judith made a specific request to keep that thread on topic, so I will ask you here why, after calling me a liar and saying that I edited material for the purpose of deception, you have failed to respond to the above comment.

Reblogged this on Bob Tisdale — Climate Observations and commented: Judith, thanks for making this a separate thread.

This makes it possible to have all comment threads open while also keeping comment threads on topic.

The post is making a point the first comments on this thread miss.

It is a technique that I have seen contrarians use before on threads — barge in making ridiculous claims, then sane and rational people get frustrated and then you cut and paste their comments out of context and say — see how mean tow «extremists» are.