â $ œThe insurance agent who sold you this is
making an emotional argument, not a rational one.
Not exact matches
These feelings run very deep, and the
emotional appeal
made in
arguments over abortion is very strong indeed.
Christians, then, should
make their
arguments carefully, winsomely, graciously, and firmly, in the hope that «the law written on the heart» will overcome
emotional prejudice, intellectual laziness, and moral compromise.
It's one thing to offer an
argument that should only convince those who are already on your side but is a little deceptive because it
makes an
emotional appeal that isn't really all that rational on pro-life premises.
While some couples are quite happy not having sex, most are not and an
argument can be
made that if you're in a committed relationship and you're not in the mood for sex for a length of time, well, OK — you might want to be open to exploring why; there's probably a treasure trove of reasons, some complicated (a history of sexual abuse, religious upbringing, body shame, etc.) and some not (raising young kids, menopause,
emotional labor, etc.).
It's the same
argument that's been used to deny women the vote, restrict service in combat, and bar them from higher education: women are just too irrational and
emotional to
make sound decisions.
Here's what you'll need: Microphone (s): Any microphone will work You have to
make your
argument, it has to
make sense and it has to
make an
emotional connection.
That failure to recognize that Rowling's moral
arguments are as important as the visual and
emotional spectacle of her novels is particularly evident in the changes David Yates
made to Rowling's narrative in second Deathly Hallows movie.
Argument demands a more rigorous attention to citing concrete evidence over
making emotional pleas.
I kept having that feeling of — I know what he's talking about, I've lived it for years as an urban educator — but I've never seen anyone
make such a clear
argument for the fact that schools need to focus on developing students» social and
emotional skills.
In a separate report, a council of 28 scientists called on schools to focus on SEL,
making the
argument that student success is tied not only to academic ability and cognitive skills (such as working memory and self - regulation) but also to
emotional skills (such as the ability to cope with frustration) and interpersonal skills (including empathy and the ability to resolve conflict).
But when I read the discussion that took place over the weekend at Paidcontent.org between Mathew Ingram and Laura Owen that is described as a «smack - down,» I scratch my head and wonder if anyone can
make something more than an
emotional and nostalgic
argument to defend a practice (the likely illegal price - fixing scheme called «agency pricing «-RRB- that is just such a «subsidy» model.
It's an
emotional, character - driven experience that
makes a damn good
argument for videogames as a legitimate and unique form of storytelling.
At the same time, Richard's care in «curating» these rooms with his beloved elements of kitsch,
makes a compelling
argument for the unexpected visual and
emotional staying power of things often associated with «bad» taste.»
The core problem, I believe, is the interaction between our penchant for biased reasoning on the one hand, the deeply polarized political climate (which pushes
emotional buttons rather than encouraging calm deliberation), and the rich misinformation environment (there's a ready -
made argument in defense of anything and everything).
And start
making useful
emotional arguments - rather than logical ones; since emotion trumps logic repeatedly.
If there is one comment that
makes a strong
argument on a particular point and many comments that argue the opposite side of that point with weak technical or purely
emotional arguments who wins?
Just as with climate science denial, creationism, etc, once the irrational jump is
made and the
emotional lock - in occurs, it is followed with a farrago of cherry picking, generalisation and specious
arguments.
Oftentimes, injured individuals
make claims for damages from their insurance carriers based on
emotional arguments and testimony from loved ones as to how much they have suffered.
Emotional IQ is the ability to recognize not just your emotions, intentions, and mood, but that of those around you, and it's what
makes some people so much better than others at mediating
arguments, coaching others through tough times, and managing projects and people.
The fights and
arguments couples have are often not about the content of what is said, but about the
emotional underpinnings of how things are said, or how what is said
makes us feel.
Couples who
make love last a lifetime have mastered these 7 skills which prevent negative cycle
arguments and deepen
emotional connection.
When someone is in a place of
emotional reactivity, it's virtually impossible for them to
make a logical
argument.
So in a sense, even if you do calm down after being upset, you've still lost, because those biochemicals are going to hang out in your brain,
making arguments or
emotional withdrawal much easier.