Sentences with phrase «make errors in calculations»

Whether you sign up for it or have the bank cover you automatically, overdraft protection is a good safety net that can catch you during those occasional times when you make errors in calculations or simply forget to make a deposit or transfer to your checking account.

When March 21, 1844 came and went without incident, Miller was not deterred; admitting that he must have made some error in his calculations, he still believed the «day of the Lord is near, even at the door.»

I must have made an error in my calculations somewhere.

1) As I pointed out earlier, I made an error in the calculation of latent heat of fusion of 100cu.

Not exact matches

According to The Sun though, Koscielny will be staying where he is and that is because the German club has made the sort of error in their calculations that Arsene Wenger and Arsenal made when trying to sign the Uruguayan international striker Luis Suarez from Liverpool.

Marzari notes that even for battery materials, an area in which computational materials science is having its best success stories, standard calculations still have an average error of half a volt, which makes a lot of difference in terms of performance.

Which is one of the reasons purposefully making errors in macronutrient calculations can be an extremely beneficial strategy for maintaining long - term dietary compliance.

Although, be prepared to make some minor adjustments due to rounding errors in some of these calculations:

«Chase also made calculation errors when filing debt collection lawsuits that sometimes resulted in judgments against consumers for incorrect amounts.

In the meantime we redid all the forcing calculations from Miller et al to make sure they were correct and found that in one case — the iRF for the historical (all - forcing) simulation, land - use had been effectively neglected (it was a complex error, but had the effect of not including LU as a forcingIn the meantime we redid all the forcing calculations from Miller et al to make sure they were correct and found that in one case — the iRF for the historical (all - forcing) simulation, land - use had been effectively neglected (it was a complex error, but had the effect of not including LU as a forcingin one case — the iRF for the historical (all - forcing) simulation, land - use had been effectively neglected (it was a complex error, but had the effect of not including LU as a forcing).

And given that the authors had to redo «all the forcing calculations from Miller et al to make sure they were correct» to find «that in one case» there was an error, my take is that the wording is also more precise.

then point to the error in it's calculations that make it unsuitable for solving temperature without referring to the magic your now shamed, busted & confessed pseudo-science leadership told you is needed,

Within 48 hours he is writing (# 309): «It is the editor and peer reviewers of a suitable journal who will be far more able to pick up any errors in your assumptions or calculations than I.» That is, he feels able to make unwarranted and unjustified criticisms at one stage, but when challenged pleads a lack of competence to have made such criticisms in the first place.

Amateur climatologist Steve McIntyre, who recently identified a significant error in the calculations behind the very temperature records that tell us the world is warming, reports that NASA and the UK's Climate Research Unit — institutions charged with compiling those records — are now refusing to make their methods available for scrutiny (McIntyre 11.8.2007).

Ignoring the many petty errors made, the analysis may well identify an error, that is an omission within insolation calculations used in climatology.

What is absolutely fails to mention is that when using C12 / C13 and tree ring data the margins of error in the calculations make them useless for the intended purpose.

When the ark had serious dimension problems as a result and the neighbours had even more reason to laugh and point, Noah checked the original source and discovered the error in calculation to be several hundred square cubits, setting construction back by a decade or so, creating huge cost overruns and perhaps explaining why the unicorn didn't make the trip.

If you had access to their calculations you would see errors in calculating NOI and adjustments that should be made below the line that they are including in the NOI.