Sentences with phrase «make factums»

In the past it has been offered almost exclusively by commercial publishers, but now it is brought to the public by the same body that is proposing to make factums accessible; can we keep one and exclude the other?

Not exact matches

In addition to its client - specific legal opinion services, LAO LAW makes available hundreds of general and specific memoranda, draft factums, and other materials that can be downloaded.

It's fairly widely known that most judges» minds are pretty much made up prior to hearings based on factums and other legal research.

«If a shoemaker agrees to make a pair of shoes, he can not deliver one to you and ask for half the price,» Slater Vecchio wrote in its factum.

Posting would increase public access to the process of the Supreme Court of Canada, and make the research contained in the factums generally available.

In his factum to the SCC, Groia makes the case that the law society has no jurisdiction to reprimand him for his in - court behaviour, particularly when he was not disciplined at the time by the presiding judge.

«Denying a lawyer's right to free expression on behalf of a client in a court of law in favour of a vague definition of civility and its application after the fact fetters and chills the lawyer's ability to engage in vigorous advocacy,» Groia argues in his factum, «in turn damaging the public interest, as well as infringing [on] the ability of an accused or client to make full answer and defence in a judicial proceeding.»

I don't know, for example, if any school makes drafting agreements or letters — i.e., documents other than memos or factums — a requirement in any course or research instruction.

We're helping out the Canadian Bar Association's Supreme Court of Canada Liaison Committee by running a two minute survey about whether Factums submitted to the Court should be made publicly available (as is done for the United States Supreme Court).

In accordance with the Order, ARL will be filing a factum and be given an opportunity to make oral submissions before the Court on January 15, 2018.

There are two practice points to take note of from this decision: (1) even though it is not in the Rules, the Divisional Court has an «administrative practice» that counsel should be aware of that requires leave to file a reply factum, and (2) when a party is drafting their factum, they need to anticipate what the other side might say in response - unless it is a completely «new» issue raised in response, a moving party on a leave to appeal motion will not be able to respond to the particular arguments made by the other side.

A related point made by LEAF is that choking is a major risk factor for intimate femicide (LEAF factum at para. 3).

When an individual, group or body is given leave to intervene in a case, they usually submit a written argument (called a factum) and are also given permission to make a brief oral submission to members of the court.

There are strict rules about the maximum length of the factum and the amount of time interveners are allotted to make their arguments.

The proposed interveners intend to file one joint factum of 20 pages or less and make oral submissions not exceeding 20 minutes.

Some courts even go beyond this content and use their websites to make additional materials available to the public, including appellate factums, transcripts, podcasts and in some specialized cases the pleadings.

The factum states in early January of this year the LSUC obtained a phone call recording from the sheriff's dispatch centre in San Bernardino County «of someone believed to be the respondent» making further explicit threats against Kochis.

On copyright, there was no clearly dominant position although respondents were attracted by the idea that factums were documents created for a specific public purpose, and should be made publicly accessible.

In substance, I don't see any difference between preparing a pleading (including a factum) filed in court that some layer then copies, or writing an article for a legal journal that tells some lawyer exactly how his or her argument should be made, even if it doesn't contain the exact words.

Interestingly, CanLII doesn't currently collect and make available SCC factums and neither does LexUM, which otherwise publishes judgments for the Court.

[17] In his factum, the respondent's counsel referred to a recommendation made by Commissioner Cunningham, in October 2011, in the Mississauga Judicial Inquiry.

A consideration of this issue is required because I became aware that the Appellant and Appellant's counsel, together with its co-counsel in the Federal Court of Appeal in respect of the appeal of the trial decision, had made certain public written statements about me in its factum in the Federal Court of Appeal (the «Factum») which, upon reflection, appear to me to clearly infactum in the Federal Court of Appeal (the «Factum») which, upon reflection, appear to me to clearly inFactum») which, upon reflection, appear to me to clearly include: