His position is that because we don't fully understand all of the complex reverberating effects of climate change, we can't
make good climate policy yet.
Koonin states «We are very far from the knowledge needed to
make good climate policy.»
Koonin's statement, «We are very far from the knowledge needed to
make good climate policy.»
This is indeed implied by the tagline [«We are very far from the knowledge needed to
make good climate policy»], which I didn't write or even see until publication.
Not exact matches
Councilmember Lander said the district needed someone like Sikora who would «fight for progressive values in government, try to win a more equal city, address the challenges of
climate change,
make sure the rights of workers are respected, address the issues of health care on the
policy level, and fight in the neighborhoods to improve our schools and
make them
better.»
The Senators should
make certain that the nominee pledges to use the
best available evidence on
climate change in
making policy — not unsubstantiated and fringe beliefs.
Pohl hopes that studies such as this one «will enhance our general understanding of historical and future extreme
climate variability, allowing
policy - makers to
make better - informed decisions for coastal communities.»
EN: This year, I am looking forward to communicating the recommendations
made in the
Climate Change
policy paper to other educators, so we can unite in advocating for a
better future for our schools.
Climate science and consequent
policy responses are a target because here we have an archetypal situation where individuals can not be relied on to
make choices that will avoid harming the collective
good.
Well, we all know who
makes climate policy for the Republicans: Exxon Mobil, Peabody Coal, Chevron, and the rest of them.
IPL encourages congregations to address
climate change by being
better stewards of our resources and by bringing the voice of the faith community into the
policy -
making arena.
They say the administration is
making «an insufficient response» to
climate change and is turning its back on reality: «In its rush to dismantle rational
climate and energy
policy, the administration has ignored scientific fact and
well - founded economic analyses.
Most Republicans are skeptical about whether, in general,
policies aimed at reducing
climate change benefit the environment (72 % of Republicans and Republican leaners say these
policies either
make no difference or do more harm than
good), and 57 % think such
policies harm the economy.
Preparations are
well underway in the liberal media to
make August 18 a milestone in the history of
climate policy.
With the same broad coalition that stood up against this pipeline and took to the streets during the People's
Climate March, we're better positioned than ever before to make real climate policy a top priority for the U.S. government and achieve meaningful progress in this year's climate
Climate March, we're
better positioned than ever before to
make real
climate policy a top priority for the U.S. government and achieve meaningful progress in this year's climate
climate policy a top priority for the U.S. government and achieve meaningful progress in this year's
climateclimate talks.
As the EU's
policies are essential for reaching the global
climate targets and
better living conditions for people worldwide Germanwatch engages in EU
policy making both in Berlin and Brussels.
The «Put a Price On It» coalition is proposing a progressive
policy that fights
climate change, unleashes clean energy, and
makes D.C. families
better off in the process.
Donald Trump's election victory provides the
best opportunity that is likely to occur to push back against the green lobby before they assume permanent control of the
climate / energy
policy area and with it the continued survival of the free enterprise system in the US and the fossil fuels that provide the energy that
make a modern economy function.
However, if we are going to
make the changes necessary to really tackle
climate change, psychology - based behavior change programs are only part of the solution; they work
best when combined with traditional incentives,
policies, and laws.
On Sunday, the
best climate policy in the world got even
better: British Columbia's carbon tax — a tax on the carbon content of all fossil fuels burned in the province — increased from $ 25 to $ 30 per metric ton of carbon dioxide,
making it more expensive to pollute.
Our fisheries are important components of our food system and are threatened not only by overfishing but by man -
made climate change as
well, and need
policies to maintain fish populations.
SEI's recognized expertise in
climate science,
policy engagement, decision - support tools and science communication
make us uniquely
well placed for the emerging field of
climate services.
The partnership with the Greens has delivered the
best piece of
policy making on
climate and clean energy that we have seen, and some valuable institutions.
There is considerable potential for the actions of state and local government, the private sector and individual citizens to contribute to the nationwide response to
climate change, but
better information and coordination with federal
policies would
make these decisions more effective.
Climate Services and society Policy makers can use climate services to access decision - relevant scientific information in order to make the best decisions for society as a
Climate Services and society
Policy makers can use
climate services to access decision - relevant scientific information in order to make the best decisions for society as a
climate services to access decision - relevant scientific information in order to
make the
best decisions for society as a whole.
In an article on «the perils of confirmation bias,» published for the Global Warming
Policy Foundation (a group firmly opposed to
policies that counteract
climate change), Ridley suggested that «governments should fund groups that intend to explore alternative hypotheses about the likely future of
climate as
well as those that explore the dangerous man -
made climate change prediction.»
How would
climate policy make their lives
better?
Moreover, the Rose Garden speech President Bush delivered that day removed any doubt that the new Bush - Cheney White House had already begun to spin the big lie about
climate change, the lie we know so
well we can recite it in our sleep: scientific uncertainties regarding global
climate change are too great to
make any
policy decisions, especially those that might affect the US economy (read: the US fossil fuel - based energy economy).
It would serve its role
better if it
made clear the
climate implications of its scenarios and the
policies they are based on.
Decisions
made in relation to Article 2 will determine the level of GHG concentrations in the atmosphere (or the corresponding
climate change) that is set as the goal for
policy and have fundamental implications for emission reduction pathways as
well as the scale of adaptation required.
Commit to
making significant progress towards restoring the natural environment by 2020, including the doubling of UK woodland cover, meeting other habitat targets and ensuring that protected sites are in
good condition; through utilising reforms to agricultural incentives, planning
policy and other measures to create high quality landscapes rich in nature and able to adapt to
climate change.
I like «
Climate science and
policy -
making» — reasonable short, non-contentious and covers the focus
well
Companies and Organizations have now integrated that achieving
climate neutrality
makes good business sense and many developed a corporate responsibility
policy.
As I read it, your «summary slide» concludes that
climate models are basically» not fit, not useful and not the
best choice to meet societal needs» related to
making policy decisions with regard to
climate change, with the concluding remarks:
Through the many ways he sought to increase understanding of the implications of
climate research among the general public,
policy makers and global leaders, Stephen Schneider worked to
make the world a
better place for us all.»
Fraser repeated the authority's view that policymakers need to use a «toolbox» of
policies to reach an emissions reduction target, but he also said Ross Garnaut, an expert
climate adviser to the former Labor government, had
made some «
good points» about the capacity of Direct Action — as so far outlined — to meet the targets.
Well... I guess this is just because when you pretend urging
policy makers
making decisions about
climate evolution, with heavy political and economic consequences, those decisions being fully based onto
climate models» outputs, then you have to prove that those
climate models are able to faithfully simulate «real world
climate».
Hey, even if you've already
made up your mind about the presidential candidates, are you
well informed about the local issues that effect
climate policy in your community?
Generation Zero is a movement of young New Zealanders uniting to ensure our future
well - being is not undermined by political decisions
made today on
climate change and fossil fuel
policies.
Mr. Grijalva asserts that disclosure of certain information will «establish the impartiality of
climate research and
policy recommendations» published in the institutions» names and help Congress
make better laws.
For example,
climate scientists are least
well - placed to
make a judgement on the timing and quantum of CO2 emissions that are exported from, say, Spain, as a result of higher electricity prices there resulting from wind and solar, and certainly very poorly placed to opine on the impact on global GHG emissions of cap - and - trade or any similar EU or even EU / USA - wide
policy.
«I am hopeful that disclosure of a few key pieces of information will establish the impartiality of
climate research and
policy recommendations published in your institution's name and assist me and my colleagues in
making better law,» Grijalva wrote.
Information alone is not enough to choose appropriate
policies and strategies to limit some
climate changes and prepare society for changes that are already
well under way, but without understanding the basic causes and effects of
climate change, we will be unable to
make informed decisions that will affect generations to come.
This skeptic — as in little old moi —
makes no such assertion instead asserting that if the outcome of government
policy is even nearly as damaging as the predicted damage caused by really scary
climate change then doing nothing is probably
best.
Decisions
made in relation to Article 2 would determine the level of
climate change that is set as the goal for
policy, and have fundamental implications for emission - reduction pathways as
well as the scale of adaptation required.