Sentences with phrase «make good starting points»

Now, my grandmother's mandelbrot is a well - kept family secret, but I figured since I liked the texture so much, that they would make a good starting point for these rosemary chocolate biscotti.

It makes a good starting point and seems to provide better angles.

«The fact that consumers and stakeholders alike perceive food waste as obviously unethical makes it a good starting point for individual consumers to become engaged in sustainability,» Aschemann - Witzel argues in her article for Science.

The cannon makes a good starting point for investigating the circumstances in which the attempted French invasion took place, the foreign policy of Henry VIII and the development of the English navy, as well as how the finds from the Mary Rose enrich our knowledge of life in Tudor England.

Still, the Fiat was largely free of rust (a miracle), and the paint was shiny, making it a good starting point for a rolling refurbishment.

Still, compared to newer rigs the Tacoma TRD Off - Road is a cheaper alternative, which makes it a good starting point if reliability and versatility are important to you in a 4x4 vehicle.

Local clubs will also be more open to working with you than those in other regions, which makes them a good starting point.

Display: The screen is the focal point for every reader, making it a good starting point for any critique.

It makes a good starting point.]

There are usually guidelines on the package, and they make a good starting point.

Yakuza 0 makes a good starting point for those new to the series as it's a prequel to the original Yakuza — the original Yakuza game named Yakuza: Kiwami has been remade from the ground up for the PlayStation 4 and will be released in August 2017.

This, without any caveats, makes a good starting point for responding to you.

Whilst this is not an endorsement for the recruitment firms mentioned, you should find that their focus is more specialize on the industry, so they would make a good starting point.

Not exact matches

Jennings suggests soliciting anonymous input from your staff on a situation they were in during the past year that made them uncomfortable as a good starting point.

Using the best - selling 737 - 8 as the starting point for a new type of 737 could pose such challenges, but may also be cheaper to make because of economies of scale in busy 737 - 8 production.

This is because at some point we start thinking more about how to make headlines than what is best for our business.

Creating a company - wide network such as a Slack thread or a private Facebook page that makes it easy to share stories and industry updates is a good starting point.

He started making his bets soon after, but pointed out that he really did start making serious money until well over a year later, and 2007 and 2008 were the real paydays.

The framework contemplates an enhanced child tax credit that will make things better, but there's no detail here at all, including on the income point at which the enhanced child credit will start to phase out.

«At that point the platform starts making policies, which are not necessarily the best for the rest of the ecosystem players.

APRs make it easy for borrowers to make apples - to - apples comparison between loan offers and are a good starting point for evaluating a loan offer.

i beleive there is good out there, and as a Mom i want to make sure i live me life in a way that will make my daughter proud of me so i will introduce Church to her and i will teach her the commandments because whether or not Moses came down from the mountain with two tablets in his hands they are a good starting point to instill good morals.

But Berger's propensity to expound theology solely on an empirical, inductive basis — his desire, that is, to make anthropology not only the starting point but the continuing locus of his theology — actually results in a diminished play experience as well as a truncated Christianity.

He makes a good case in showing that the starting point is in knowing we are loved.

Humanity Made for Christ When speaking to modern audiences, especially young adults, about what distinguishes us from the animals, it is not always a good idea to start with negative distinctions - pointing out, for example, that animals can not do such and such, but we can.

You are not credible because your starting point is that there are no errors in the bible and you will do whatever verbal gymnastics necessary to make yourself feel good that your beliefs are secure.

I'm not anti-stuff but I think the points made here are well taken and the church in North America needs to start paying attention to — that means me.

Some practical points: If you're just starting out, some opportunities that make a lot of sense for platform - building include: writing guest posts for popular bloggers who share a similar audience, writing a regular column for a newspaper or online magazine, seeking out speaking gigs (paid or unpaid), participating in conferences (for networking opportunities as well as exposure to new, inspiring ideas), using social media to share your message, and requesting interviews with popular authors / speakers / leaders to feature on your blog.

I do plan to hack Better Batter, but I don't plan to use this blend as the starting point since I don't plan to make this blend again once I have used up the component rice flours and starches I currently have on hand.

You could throw in whatever kinds of vegetables or beans you fancy to make this dish your own as well, think of this sauce as a starting point!

Adding eggs might make it taste better, but the point is that this is a vegan recipe - vegan pancake recipes are hard to come by, but this one is a good start.

But a good vanilla cake is a solid starting point, so I'm beginning with your almond / chocolate naked cake that you made for Thom's birthday... with extra vanilla instead of the almond extract (sob) because nut allergy... Pretty excited!

These would be a good starting point if you are new to making sushi as they really are very easy with pretty standard flavours.

Whey protein is all about maximizing your nutritional intake, and this is a good starting point as it is made to remain fresh.

he has made some good points big decision for arsene tommorow whether he rest Alexis or play as far as I am concerned we can't risk any more injuries so rest Alexis for tommorow game and introduce him as a sub in last 20 - 25 min he looks really jaded of late but knowing both Alexis and Wenger I wouldn't be surprised to see him start also should rest cazorla he has played non stop for us.

Went off on a bit of a rant... but I'm just trying to emphasise the point that clearly Arsene doesn't know best, because the exact same mistakes are made every year and so continues the cycle of false hope and before anybody starts with the «yeah but we won two FA cups back to back ``.

Corey Seager was kicked out of Double - A for being too good, and while he's started Triple - A slowly, he's still a good bet to make the 25 - man roster at some point.

When Arsenal were five points clear at the top of the Premier League table at the start of the calendar year, most Arsenal fans were not too bothered about the FA cup apart from the fact that it would have made a nice double and would have looked good in the Emirates trophy room standing next to the Premier League trophy.

So today people are confessing that Szczesny is better than Ospina.It was funny how it was made to look Szczesny was the cause of Arsenal's goals because of his mistakes.People also forget the kind of defence he's had in front of him from the time he started till he went on loan.I can't believe anyone watches Ospina and Szczesny in terms of goal keeping ability and says Ospina is better.When Ospina first came he was also making the same mistakes Szczesny made but some ignored it insisting he was better.I'd like to see Ospina go to AS Roma and do better than Szczesny.Even Juventus are in for him even if their bid is derisory.Some also said the fact that Ospina had a cool head over Szczesny meant he should start over him.If you've watched Ospina and Szczesny well from a neutral point and not being bias you'll clearly know who's better.If I was Szczesny I won't return because I'm in my prime.

if the Ox was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because of his perceived importance to our starting 11, this was an incredibly risky move that could have cost us dearly... imagine if he was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under false pretenses... this kind of behaviour might be less offensive in April, when things are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a point last year, could be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach make business decisions on game day, which has gone on for far too long

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities makes him a capable starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3 points at Anfield

muff — you are making your own inference so here, have my unicorn......... I am happy to agree Costa is a better striker but I just enjoy pointing out the daftness of some of the hyperbole on here when the green - eyed ones start worshipping the opposition and eulogising «world class this and that» — and it always has to be at the expense of our own guys.

I think there are also good connections to be made in Holland regarding future talent and i believe managing a Dutch side would be a good starting point.

even as a pundit he never really makes good points I would be more happy about arteta and DB10 or someone like Koeman, but either way arteta or Henry should first start in a team in the dutch league to learn the necessary experience

Not trying to start an argument just wanted to get my point across and if the selection is switched (plus cech to me is a better keeper but the risk of courtois leaving if he wasn't given the number 1 spot is what meant cech became number 2 to someone ten years younger than him) that would make the split 5 - 6 arsenal - Chelsea, a much more balanced split.

Manchester City have made Premier League history after the best - ever start to a campaign in terms of points following their 2 - 1 victory at Huddersfield Town yesterday.

I am slowly starting to resign to the point that the commentator made in extra team - «Arsenal is Arsenal - very good to watch but also very easy to play against.

As soon as Wenger started to think he was a tactician and able to make a sensible substitution, I felt our one point against Swansea was now zero points — and I hate being able to predict this well because it means there is a pattern or theme going on here being unaddressed.

Arsene Wenger made an illusion about the temperature that water boils at and compared it to the almost very good performances that Arsenal had been putting in at the start of the season, suggesting that the Gunners just needed a few extra degrees of temperature before we hit our own boiling point.