Sentences with phrase «make homosexual»

The majority did not even mention the ten - year - old decision in Bowers v. Hardwick, which had held, in keeping with long - standing constitutional understanding, that a state may make homosexual conduct a criminal offense.
The third decision concerned a 1992 statewide referendum in which the voters in Colorado adopted an amendment, known as Amendment 2, to their constitution prohibiting laws that make homosexual orientation, conduct, and relationships the bases of special entitlements to minority status, quota preferences, and claims to discrimination.
While many LGBT sympathizers argue that gender is a social construct, gays and lesbians clearly think the gender of their partner matters ¯ it's what makes them homosexual.
And there is a case to be made that homosexual behaviors hurts individuals and society as a whole even secularly..
Is it Christians who have made homosexual marriage a «trending» topic in our national dialogue... or is it those who want to normalize and legalize homosexual marriage?
since God made homosexuals, and all these heterosexuals keep producing gay kids and we have evidence of homosexuality occurring in another animals as well as neuroscience and social sciences since 1963 stating that being gay isn't a disease but a natural orientation and since the writers of the bible would have no clue that it could be an orientation (just as they could have no idea that the world isn't flat, not up on pillars, nor is it surrounded by water, nor was the earth created from a leviathan carcass) thus it is permissible and subject to the same statutes heterosexuals are.
since God made homosexuals, The article you cite and Biblical writers indicate that it is not natural - «what is to be expected» — Your own discussion has indicated that this is not true.
Your statement of «There is no evidence that God made homosexuals
Daniel said: «Does God make homosexuals or does he just create male and female?
Does God make homosexuals or does he just create male and female?
Like I said, it is like making a homosexual joke the fits stereotypes and claiming that you purpose is to show how stupid homosexual bigotry is.
No one is making a homosexual or a heterosexual have sex.
The Court moved a long way toward making homosexual conduct a constitutional right, adopted the radical feminist view that men and women are essentially identical, continued to view the First Amendment as a protection of self - gratification rather than of the free articulation of ideas, and overturned two hundred years of history to hold that political patronage is unconstitutional.
In this week's News & Analysis section, Michael Balter reported on legislation signed into law in Uganda last week that makes homosexual acts punishable by up to 14 years in prison; homosexual acts involving minors could draw a lifetime sentence.

Not exact matches

Apparently, Degrassi, another show whose advertisers the group targets, «promotes the transgender and homosexual lifestyles and other inappropriate behavior to an audience made up of almost exclusively teens and children.»
He appears to have used the Thompsons» photos to manufacture a Facebook page using images of the older son that made him appear to be homosexual, hoping to engage the young man online.
Nevertheless, he decried, and actually seemed surprised by the fact that the jargon, presumptions, odor of sanctity, and especially the legal tools left over from the civil rights movement's glory years, now three generations past, are being used to sanction homosexual unions and in general make of non-heterosexuals yet another legally privileged group.
It only makes it all the more urgent for young people to be told the truth that sexual promiscuity, whether homosexual or heterosexual, may endanger their lives, that condoms are by no means a foolproof way to avoid that risk, and that chastity is the best defense.
As this story got some play, even at the highest levels of the movie business to make it into a feature (we were signed to an option by the guys who did Philadelphia and Silence of the Lambs), one of the fears we had was that someone would turn Lonnie into a homosexual hero (like Harvey Milk).
On the one hand, Virtually Normal presents a very sanitized picture of male homosexual life; there are no details of the gay subculture to repel heterosexual readers and make them less amenable to Sullivan's political proposals.
The influence of gay marriage, Sullivan believes, would not only make it easier to grow up gay, but would actually change how adult homosexuals conduct their lives.
It is naturally obvious that human sexual organs are made for heterosexual penetration — they «fit» — and that homosexual sex (for Reilly, this is embodied especially in anal penetration) is a mis - fit.
When we have those nuts at Westboro Baptist picketing soldier's funerals, spitting on homosexuals, and making videos about how Santa is a fag and will send you to hell, we catch a glimpse of what happens when abhorrence of evil combined with confrontation consumes and destroys love, catapulting them into realms of hatred that Jesus would fall down weeping at the sight of.
is a convincing and remarkably candid argument that the case for homosexual relations must be made against Scripture and the Christian tradition.
As the story makes clear, it is not actually the teenagers who are opening up the subject as it is organizations run by adults who want to «help» teenagers identify themselves as homosexual.
I love the argument he makes, even while I am a progressive Christian who accepts homosexuals as equals in the eyes of God.
It clearly matters for the homosexual couple: They want to have their own kid, and they'll use «female sperm» or «male eggs» to make it happen.
There is widespread agreement with the view presented in the article on homosexuality in Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics (edited by Carl F. Henry [Baker Book House, 1973]-RRB-, which declares that «those who base their faith on the OT and NT documents can not doubt that their strong prohibitions of homosexual behavior make homosexuality a direct transgression of God's law.»
«Good versus Evil: it is that simple,» declared a businessman's letter urging Bloomington citizens «to prayerfully make it a matter of immediate personal decision: to shun the sodomites and their supporters, to use every lawful device to eliminate homosexual activity in this area, and to rededicate our community to standards set forth by God.»
Schwoyer made the point that many people think of homosexuals as concerned only with lust.
There's such a tendency among Christians to lump all homosexuals together as a group of faceless, nameless «perverts» and to make statements not rooted in fact.
This discussion began with me commenting on the sense that there is something, I'm not sure what, problematic about the position that those with homosexual desires are not to practice, and that makes everything okay.
So you could say environment does make some men homosexual who maybe weren't born that way.
A Netherlands pastor makes the point even more strongly by urging Christian moralists to «develop a morality for homosexuality in consultation with homosexual people» (The Sexual Revolution, by J. Rinzema [Eerdmans, 1974]-RRB-.
The belief that the cartoon is lampooning is that homosexuals are made so by their environment; that is correct; but it does so by implying that this belief necessarily implies that heterosexuals are also made so by their environment.
The author of the review thinks this book sinks under its own weight, for its author makes no secret of his loathing of the whole homosexual community, quoting every passage in the bible that can even remotely be translated against them, often twisting passages to say what they do not mean.
«Today's opinion dismantles the structure of constitutional law that has permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and homosexual unions, insofar as a formal recognition in marriage is concerned,» wrote Scalia.
Believing that homosexuals are made so by environment in no way implies that heterosexuals are made so by their environment.
When such a claim is made and when homosexual activity is consequently condoned, or when civil legislation is introduced to protect behaviour to which no one has any conceivable right, neither the Church nor society at large should be surprised when other distorted notions and practices gain ground, and irrational eruptions increase.»
You have thus far completely refused all questions given to you in attempts to discuss the issue, have made absolutely zero effort to prove your assertion that homosexual activity is sinful, and have chosen instead to fall back on theatrical bravado.
I therefore conclude that you make equal argumentation against second marriages (as compared to homosexual marriage).
The Patheos site does not show replies... somehow, my inbox shows that you are asking Gary to make a scriptural case for one of two items: — that God makes people gay; and / or — that God blesses homosexual behavior.
They have made themselves especially visible by leading the attack on homosexual activity.
I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»
God ALSO made some intersexual, some asexual, some bi-sexual, and some homosexual.
having ssid that i think that for God sin is sin and only sin he can't forgive is the unpardonable sin of unbeliving that Jesus is the the word made flesh who paid the penalty for sins on the cross at calvary he loves homosexuals as much as heterosexuals.
If a homosexual person is so made that an intimate loving relationship is possible only with a member of the same sex, on what basis can this experience of love be declared sinful?
I don't believe that God specifically and arbitrarily made Jack and Jill homosexual, while making John and Jane Straight.
I have read every widely available case made for the position that homosexual behavior is not a sin or that committed homosexuals are not what the bible is talking about.
It is interesting to note that National Statistics, reported by The Daily Telegraph, not long after the debate indicated that homosexual persons make up 1.5 \ % of the United Kingdom population; a figure consistent with Academic research over twenty five years.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z