Sentences with phrase «make it a good value for the money»

But Sherwood, who worked with Sigurdsson during his spell as head coach at Tottenham, insists the player's talents make him good value for money.

The stroller can be used for up to 6 months making it a good value for money for the parent The stroller has included a second seat kit that allows you to transform the baby jogger city select stroller into a double stroller without having a wide double stroller.

Magnesium citrate has good bioavailability and inexpensive, making it good value for money.

But if you look carefully, all the additions on the Baleno make it better value for money than the Swift.

Easy to swallow, their minimum packaging makes them good value for money.

This awesome itinerary combines an 8 Day Thailand Experience, 13 Day Full Moon Experience and the 18 Day Island Hopper making it the best value for money trip on the planet!

On the other hand, if I use the cash & points option for Category 4 — 7 properties, I'm effectively buying points from Marriott below my own valuation (at a discount) which makes it good value for money for me.

The smartphone has got a price cut recently, which makes it a good value for money product.

Not exact matches

Since the acquisition, Motorola proved that it can make excellent handsets that strike the value - for - money balance very well...

This idea revolutionized the world because it was fresh and very smart, if you own a stock below its intrinsic value and the company goes bankrupt, then you will get in return more than what you paid for, so, if the company goes bankrupt, you make money and if the company does well, then you keep making money.

Given the large amount of money that was made with well - run campaigns, the temptation to move over to the «dark side» brought a proliferation of copycat sites which presented almost no value for the consumer.

I don't consider myself frugal, I just make sure I get value for money on what I want, I don't buy crap and get the best deal I can on fixed expenses.

Stocks of companies that have good free cash flow are another option to consider if you don't mind doing the research on individual stocks.2 When a company's free cash flow — the money available after a company makes payments to sustain its business — is increasing, it can be a good sign for the company's future value and its stock's future value.

The exchange with the best value for your money will depend on the currencies you're trading, your planned trade volume, how frequently you'll be making withdrawals and the coin prices themselves.

While the best Bundt pans made by Nordicware, may not be on the cheap size, in terms of value for money, when used they deliver every single time.

When faced with a wall of mueslis at the supermarket or health food store, you can end up feeling very overwhelmed trying to make sense of packaging claims and find the best value for money.

At one time, consumers were very price - sensitive and wanted to make sure that they were getting the best possible value for their money.

But if we're reportedly offering less than his # 25m release clause, then that would make him a lot better value for money, so who knows, might be a good deal after all.

If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.

It is highly unlikely that there would be room at the Emirates for two of European football's most highly - rated youngsters and it would appear Wenger will have to make a decision which one he feels represents better value for money.

With reports that Arsenal are making progress on a # 50m deal to sign Paris Saint - Germain striker Edinson Cavani, CaughtOffside looks at five other possible targets upfront who'd make better signings, or at least better in terms of value for money than the expensive Uruguayan...

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

Can anyone say, with a straight face, that there is not a single player in that list who would have come to United, made them a much better team, and been fantastic value for money?

2nd you will loose on his much needed value if you let him off for free next season instead of making good use of this money to obtain a decent replacement someone like Mahrez or whom ever else would be a much better asset in that scenario plus Sanzhez being South American and all shall be very vocal about it and will throw tantrums and negative images through out the season for keeping him against his will and will simply will act childish which we all saw is very capable of and this would seriously affect team spirit for no good reason if you can actually avoid all that and offload him for a decent price now

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Whether or not that still makes him an appealing option remains to be seen, but on the face of it, for a top - class defender with plenty of experience and quality at a high level, that could still represent a very good deal in terms of value for money and so perhaps Chelsea could eye up a fresh bid next year.

It lathers really well, thus making you to get good value for your money.

It just reduces the number of orders you have to make and you're less likely to run out and it's a lot better value for money as savings can be made!

The Foscam FBM3502 is a good value for money, and a reliable product with easy to use features that promise to make life easier for parents.

But when it comes down to it there are many aspects to an organizer which all determine its quality, and if it's a good value for money product you want its best to be aware of what makes the best stroller organizer.

All you need to do is make sure to buy travel system stroller from most excellent as well as a reliable retailer so that you could get the best value for money.

If you think of value for money so Inglesina Trilogy Stroller Review is the best stroller you can have to make your baby ride happy & safe.

Being such a great character and having such a portable design, this is a very good value for money toy in general but as far as crib soothers go, it's not the best out there in regards to range in function, sound quality and features, however, it is a great affordable option of soother and would make a fantastic gift to a very young child.

It's an all in one mobile toy where the main activity center can also detach and be played with on the floor as well making it a really flexible and therefore great value for money product.

One of the deciding factors that makes this probably the best value for money choice in tandem strollers is the price it sells for, at under $ 150 on retail sites like Amazon, the Graco DuoGlider Classic Connect represents a financially-wise choice, given the value you get for this price.

After seeing our guidelines on selecting a double stroller and checking out our top picks in different categories, you have all the information you need to make a great decision, that will not only serve your children's needs best, but will offer high value for your money.

And you get an amazing 180 capsules in the pack which ensures that you get value for your money which is one of the things that make them the best prenatal vitamins.

• Larger than traditional Moses Baskets and includes mattress and stand it offers good value for money (0 - 6 months) • Light weight and easy to move keeping baby close (Only 4 KG) • The wickerless material makes it easy to clean and silent when baby moves • Ventilated base and breathable mesh fabrics for better airflow • Fold away white wooden stand can be used in two positions; fixed or rocking

- Non-toxic finish is free of lead and phthalates - 4 adjustable mattress levels - Very well - made, great value for money - Looks modern and is easy to put together

The Joovy Zoom 360 made it onto our list of the best jogging strollers because it's a solid model that offers great value for money.

Value: Born shoes are a tremendous value for the money because they are extremely well made shoes that will last through many seaValue: Born shoes are a tremendous value for the money because they are extremely well made shoes that will last through many seavalue for the money because they are extremely well made shoes that will last through many seasons.

Good value for money and one of the best purchases I made on Amazon for my baby.

Taxpayers are entitled to receive good value for their money, and a Conservative government should always make that a high priority.

Labour also said today they would pledge better value for public money while making no big spending commitments in a bid to reduce a record budget deficit.

I have learned so much about making public bodies work better, and getting good value for money, it would be crazy not to build on it.»

What we need to do is introduce real reforms into both to make them much more effective and thus give taxpayers far better value for money.

But Mr Johnson said the DoH wants to make better use of the independent sector, ensuring all schemes offer sound value for money and meet local needs.

«Now that an increasing number of PFI deals are in their operational stage, and change will inevitably be needed over time, the public sector has to raise its game to get a better outcome and use the guidance and resources available, particularly as changes made to operational projects have not always provided value for money.»

M: Overall, there are major differences in performance in relation to money spent, and the correlation tends to be that the best performers are countries which, in effect, make sure that young people are set free to pursue their own agenda and express their creativity, and that systems that entrench the young too long in training or in hierarchical structures of apprenticeship and deference to their elders don't get the same value for their money.