Sentences with phrase «make it in a world without»

Her first film roles in the Mike Judge work - inspired comedy «Office Space» and «Rock Star,» the fictional biography of wannabe Judas Priest front - man quickly proved to critics that she could make it in a world without her friends.

Not exact matches

If Twitter is serious about being a force for good in the world and a haven from harassment for its users, it will have to start by making it harder to tweet without any sort of accountability.

The lamp's exceptional design and engineering has made it popular, not just in areas without electricity but around the world.

He says tweaking the telecom regulations without doing the same in broadcasting makes no sense in a converged world, where companies own both distribution and broadcasting assets.

They eliminate the factors associated with human trading since they trade without any attached feelings and they, therefore, don't suffer from greed which is the main reason behind the losses that most binary options traders in the world make.

If you can make it big in the publishing world, you can make a substantial income without much work (except for the actual writing of the book).

You can build all the calls - to - action and landing pages in the world, but without valuable content to make redemption worthwhile, your lead generation will quickly dry up.

No God would make a world in such poor taste, scoffed Darwin, thinking of blind nature's waste, of creatures duplicate, ungainly, vile: too many mollusks, slime without soul or style.

Those of us without your empty words in our heads will make the world better and stronger.

If this world of ours can come to grips and learn to scrap religious views and just serve one God and ONLY ONE GOD without making a such a BIG DEAL about messianic belief, it would be a much more peaceful world to live in.

As for the insults, you might wish to skip the hypocrisy when it is you who claimed that without religion there can be no morals, simply power - you insult many by making such a ludicrous claim and you fail to comprehend that there are only 2 billion Christians in this world... does that make the remaining 5 billion immoral?

They were living in a world without science, a world that did not make sense, a world that was scary and illogical, a world that needed explanation.

20 For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: 21 because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened.22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four - footed beasts, and creeping things.24 Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.

The one thing they all have in common is willingness to believe without question based on nothing more than faith — the world's worst decision - making method.

nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.

Children don't exactly raise themselves and make a go at in the world without some training and acceptance to abide by.

Even if this made any sense, there would be plenty of better eays to get across a message about who is in contol (like creating humans who already understand that) without making a world in which people suffer now and can be sent into eternal punish, ent.

The first danger is that, with its strong appeal to the sense of the dramatic and the romantic, the radical response may attract individuals who see the world in black and white, who may then see themselves as «holier than thou» because they make do without new furniture or red meat or homogenized peanut butter.

Yet it is more than a stamp; it is a burden laid upon him which makes him wholly acceptable, vulnerable, disponible, and yet withdraws him to the task of «giving his flesh for the life of the world»: almost in the moment when an outburst of popular devotion would bestow upon him the splendor of kingship, a kingship of popular acclaim which he refused without seeming even to consider attempting to manage it.

God's way and his moral: let a woman without means become a productive member of a family paying her way, postponing having children until she can find a husband and / or make her way in this world.

And finally, if we do not want the world to be submerged by a pagan secularism without God and without hope, we ought not to compile statistics and make forecasts, but should bear our Christian witness in the market place by word and deed.

Without freedom, man could not place himself in a state of gift in return; without it God's love of the world would be without the fullness that freedom makes poWithout freedom, man could not place himself in a state of gift in return; without it God's love of the world would be without the fullness that freedom makes powithout it God's love of the world would be without the fullness that freedom makes powithout the fullness that freedom makes possible.

There are more people who believe in peace, unity and the pursuit of truth and slog daily to make a difference in this crazy world, without recognition or praise... writing a book doesn't make him credible or noble..

I'm no biblical scholar, but this is addressed in Romans 1:20 «For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.»

the bible talks about the religion of man, verses that of christ, he has not the holy spirit, chris made it very clear who enters heaven, he also said you are either for me or against me, man can not serve two masters, you may know how to read the bible, but without the holy spirit, the truth is hidden from you, they have a form of godlyness, but are without the spirit, they speak wonderful words, but the truth is not in them, many will flock to the anti christ, Obama shows how easy it will be for satan to decieve the world, the bible has a lot to say about the end times, and we are in that area.

And Yahweh is jewish terminology is the same now that mean Allah and Yahweh are the same being but christian god is unknown I don't know what he is, And Muhammad in the Qur» an is the last of all Prophets and Messengers and is known as Rehmat ul alimeen the mercy of the world he forgive his most bitterest enemies who tortured him and his followers for believing in one true God.Now Muhammad never try to fake a miracle, the pig is forbidden to eat even in the jewish testament and so even here bible agrees but I don't know why christians eat pork.Secondly wine was forbidden because Muhammad's companions saw the evil in it.So please don't speak without having proper knowledge or Blurting out made up stories that actually have no sense, the jews call Jesus the false prophet, Sorcerer, Necromancer etc would you beieve those stories or be angry.Surely we both know the answer

The real tragedy for Byrne's new Adam is not that he hates the world he has to live in; most of us feel a similar hate at least sometimes, without believing that such frustration makes us King Lear.

He who thinks that the world, without any such unity of significance as constitutes an experience, would still have been or might be a real world, and who deduces this from the fact — which spiritualism accepts — that the world without a particular human personality, Mr. X is perfectly possible, must also be one who thinks that if from «himself» those qualities which make him Mr. X were to be subtracted, nothing of the nature of mind would remain — in short, he is one who does not believe that other minds are members of himself.

Man, can't make any post on this topic without it turning into a discussion about whether or not religion is responsible for all the evil in the world...

The teacher should, in the best possible pedagogical world, make the transition from Romance to Precision pass almost without notice.

Many of the brightest and best people in the world of business now figure out new ways to make money without investing in any productive activity.

So my twofold task is first to show what it is about the treatment of eternal objects in Science and the Modern World which makes the Aristotelian move possible, and then secondly to suggest a way of handling the source of subjective aims without there being any need to implicate God in the procedure.

We ought not to thank God for them without being sensitively aware of the misery and confusion of the world, penitent for our share in causing it, responsive to the call of God to help make possible for all men the blessings in which we rejoice.

This means, as Whitehead puts it, that «a particular determination can be made of the how of some definite relationship of a definite eternal object A to a definite number n of other eternal objects, without any determination of the other n objects, x1, x2,... x11, except that they have, each of them, the requisite status to play their respective parts in that multiple relationship» (Science and the Modern World 237).

Looking at this side of the ambiguity, we see a church in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its due; a church where changing jobs for the sake of peace and justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.

The criticisms I have made of the contemporary American university do not even apply without qualification to those in other parts of the world.

The world of scholarship is wholly man - made but not without regard for the regularities and relationships in the created order.

The Church's renewed understanding of herself and of the world makes it possible for her henceforth to enter into dialogue with everybody, without abandoning her «claim to exclusiveness»,... which previously seemed to make sincere dialogue virtually impossible in advance both for the world and for the Church.2

If one asks, what are the possible roads to a world without war, that essential way - station on the way to freedom of information in anecologically organized world, Arthur Waskow answers that there are five: (a) Control of the nation - state system through stabilizing the balance of power and reducing international tensions but keeping the weapons; (b) Reform of the system through total disarmament without abandoning national sovereignty or the pursuit of national interest; (c) Extension of the system through the creation of a federal world government; (d) Fragmentation of the system through increases in the power of extra-national associations and Institutions across national boundaries, and corresponding decreases in state power as these occupational, industrial, scientific, and other groups gradually expropriate from the national governments the power to make decisions within their own fields; and (e) Abolition of the system through substituting love f or coercion.20.»

Those who have truly made God's Torah their purpose in this world will survive not only the Holocaust but also the memory of all the lesser holocausts; they will remember them without ever being done in by them.

This does not make me in a «world of fence - sitting, not - knowingess, but not - trying - ness either» This blog is ignorant, judgmental of others» beliefs, and critical, without really a bit of understanding.

So then, remember that at one time you Gentiles by birth, called «the uncircumcision» by those who are called «the circumcision» — a physical circumcision made in the flesh by human hands — remember that you were at that time without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.

Whatever the truth in pluralism, there is this truth in monism: no world without a fundamental order which makes it a world.

But what it can mean to say that God is immanent in the world without an intolerable spatializing of the concept was never made clear.

This chapter looks at one side of the Bible's ambiguity where we see a church in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations.

But without perspective, passion is too likely to see the world in black and white, too likely to result in missing the achievable good by aiming without compromise at the unachievable perfect, too likely to produce unnecessary division and acrimony that can make progress more difficult.

If you really understand another person in this way, if you are willing to enter his private world and see the way life appears to him, without any attempts to make evaluative judgments, you run the risk of being changed yourself.

It is possible that in a fallen world (and yes, this is the theological premise without which one can not really make sense of this stuff) where struggle for land involves war, and the only kind of war at the time was the kind described in the Old Testament texts, that this was the way it had to be if the land - gift promise was to be fulfilled in due course.

Literature could (but would not without a decision to let it) make us more sensitive to the actualities of the world, both its cosmological and anthropological dimensions, in which we are called to be faithful.

What is relevant here is the common presupposition of scientists that matter (or whatever it is that makes up the physical world) is ontologically prior to experience in the sense that matter can exist without experience but experience can not exist without matter.