Sentences with phrase «make it to court because»

After counsel on both sides entered their appearances, Metuh's counsel, Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, informed the court that his client could not make it to court because he was indisposed.

Many lawsuits filed against former employers have no real basis, and many never even make it to court because of lack of evidence.

Not exact matches

Apple's response is complicated, made more so because it includes Constitutional arguments (First and Fifth Amendment) that it will need if the case goes to the Supreme Court.

Because the case was tied up in court for years, he said, the narrative from the Democratic side ended up being about how unfair and difficult the law made it for many to vote.

The FBI made clear to the court that Steele was not let go as a source because the information he provided was inaccurate but because he made «unauthorized disclosures» to the media in September 2016, according to the Democratic memo.

That was a big deal, legally speaking, because gender stereotyping was key to one of the biggest Supreme Court cases upholding federal anti-discrimination laws, involving a woman's inability to make partner at the former accounting firm Price Waterhouse.

«The court rejected (the plaintiff's) theory that the newspaper's publication violated her right to privacy because her post to MySpace was made virtually to everyone with an internet connection,» Zaller wrote in a blog post two years ago, asserting the case could apply to situations of employees posting on social media.

Raisman, who has become a vocal critic of both organizations after initially revealing the abuse in her autobiography released last fall, did not plan to go to court but says she felt compelled to press forward because she believes USA Gymnastics and the USOC are not making a sincere effort to «properly address the problem.»

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said its ruling stemmed from a 2008 decision in which it held that Cablevision Systems Corp. could offer a remote digital video recording service without paying additional licensing fees to broadcasters because each playback transmission was made to a single subscriber using a single unique copy produced by that subscriber.

The FBI also made clear to the court that Steele was not let go as a source because the information he provided was inaccurate, but because he made «unauthorized disclosures» to the media in September 2016.

The court further determined that the SEC's analysis was incomplete because the SEC failed to determine, whether, under the existing regime, sufficient protections existed to enable investors to make informed investment decisions and sellers to make suitable recommendations to investors

Investigators in the Aaron Hernandez murder case searched a Bristol storage unit rented in the name of his fiancee, Shayanna Jenkins, because they believed she made «overt attempts to hide evidence... and to hinder and mislead» the investigation, according to court documents released Friday.

This is because the nature of the business makes it possible for you to successful run the business without having any cause to challenge anybody in court for illegally making use of your company's intellectual properties.

Hobson and her coworkers expected to have their day in court, but because Murphy Oil had made Hobson and the other workers sign forced arbitration clauses upon hiring, the company demanded that they drop their group complaint and enter into individual arbitrations.

The meeting came just one day before the pope met with Kim Davis, the Kentucky County Clerk who made national headlines for refusing to issue marriage licenses because of her opposition to the Supreme Court's legalization of same sex marriage.

A group that claims a sincere religious belief in staying high all the time will probably lose its ease, not because it is necessarily insincere but because any drug defendant could make that claim and courts have no good way to know who is telling the truth.

Just because pro-choice advocates make these arguments does not mean that courts (the same courts that are ready to overrule Roe) are likely to discover abortion rights under a statute that does not even mention abortion and that was enacted with the support of pro-life groups like the National Association of Evangelicals and the Mormon Church.

The only question that I thought was hard was number 10, because with the Surpreme Court you never really know what the decision is unless you know the breakdown of liberals to conservatives when the decision was made.

If we still have our laws determined by the European Court of Justice, then our parliament is no longer able to make all our laws, and the votes of the British peoples do not count because our laws are made and interpreted by a foreign cCourt of Justice, then our parliament is no longer able to make all our laws, and the votes of the British peoples do not count because our laws are made and interpreted by a foreign courtcourt.

Back in the nineteenth century, the Supreme Court explained that churches have authority over their internal decision - making because «All who unite themselves to such a body do so with an implied consent to this government.»

Further to my statement is this, the GOD of the Jewish people make this commandment, but my god, which we will cause reason, might command me to put a phalic symbol on my door post, the courts will NOT find in her favor because of religous freedom.

If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it in my Medical Records to stop others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have to try to prevent a Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge ordered them not to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the Court Orders, to made money poisoning me with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that to their suspecting Victims to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned to do to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter of the Minneapolis VA, of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the harm they caused.

Because public opinion supporting certain kinds of abortion is close to unanimous; it was formed before the 1973 Supreme Court decision; and the majority that have come of sexual age since that year now take for granted that fertility decisions are to be made only by the individuals involved.

That democracy can be made to work, that by the scientific method we can gain mastery over the latent resources of the universe, that trial by jury is practicable, that torture is a foolish method of seeking evidence in the courts, that chattel slavery is a failure — such things we take for granted, not because we individually are wiser than our forebears, who disbelieved them all, but because we share in a social tradition which we did not even help to create, but which has shaped and conformed our thinking with irresistible power.

Small claims court cases are much cheaper than superior court cases for both the plaintiff (the person doing the suing) and the defendant (the person being sued) because the parties are not allowed to have any attorneys represent them and other rules that simplify the lawsuit process, making the whole thing much cheaper, faster, and easier.

The reality is 65 million people voted for Trump... and while a lot of those votes came from people who were legitimately frustrated with both political parties and wanted someone to shake up the system, and a lot of votes cam from traditional doctrinaire Republican voters who held their nose and voted for the guy because they wanted a tax cut, and other voters were pseudo-moralistic Evangelical hypocrites who wanted to reward McConnell for STEALING Merrick Garland's Supreme Court seat, there were a whole lot of Trump voters — including a lot of voters from Pennsylvania's «T» — who voted for Trump because they are racist, white supremicist xenophobes who saw in Trump someone who spoke their language and would «make america great again» (read «make america WHITE again»).

Because if there'd been a court fight it would've made headlines all over Wyoming, and then reporters and outsiders would've become interested, and, sooner or later, they'd have wanted to know what we wanted to know right from the beginning: Where'd Arambel get the 1080?

One attempt at simulating the clay - court effect, producing a hard surface with a rough, granulated finish, failed because the ball was not in contact with the court long enough — only.0017 second — to make any appreciable difference.

There are runaway dads, often unconfident in their parenting role, and excluded fathers, desperate to see their children but prevented from doing so because the acrimony of the split makes any court order unenforcable.

Generally, the law requires a person paying child support to make those payments until (1) your child is no longer a minor, unless the child has special needs; (2) the child becomes active - duty military; (3) your parental rights are terminated through adoption or another legal process, or (4) your minor child is declared «emancipated» by a court — that is, declared an adult earlier than normal because of the ability to be self - supporting.

Alistair Nelson also told the Court that he made the said comments because producers of the show failed to brief him ahead of the programme.

However, in Olmstead v US (1928) the Supreme Court ruled that wiretapping did not constitute a violation of search and seizure (Fourth Amendment) or self - incrimination (Fifth Amendment) because there was no entry into premises to be searched and Olmstead was free not to make self - incriminating remarks on the phone.

When a matter is already in a court of law, the people who had one thing or the other to do with the matter are not expected to make comments because such would be considered as sub-judice.

«The imposition of such automatic penalties could have the consequences of making the courts less receptive to arguments that the GAAR applies, because in marginal cases they may consider the imposition of such penalties to be unfair.

I share the view expressed by objective and reasonable members of the public that because the government was the 1st defendant / respondent against whom the Supreme Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort court only to deliberately abort them.

The Supreme Court nominees must be endorsed, but because of time limits, he asked for permission for the Executive Committee to make the endorsement.

QUOTE OF THE DAY: «Gambling always makes me queasy because I think for a lot of people it's an addiction... It's hard to get entirely excited about it,» — Bill de Blasio, on the Supreme Court's decision legalizing sports betting

The court did not change the date for state and local elections because it was not empowered to make that change.

That judicial review will be more difficult in future, because Grayling has acted to make it next to impossible for the individual to challenge the state in court.

The other two grounds are that the National Industrial Court is the court with jurisdiction because the alleged crime was made in the course of Agbo's employment and that the case against her is unknown toCourt is the court with jurisdiction because the alleged crime was made in the course of Agbo's employment and that the case against her is unknown tocourt with jurisdiction because the alleged crime was made in the course of Agbo's employment and that the case against her is unknown to law.

The commission has made this decision because since issuing its application to the high court on 12 May, it has received sufficient material from the party to proceed with its investigation.»

And because they made it seem like it was a record compiled and transmitted by the court below, we had no choice but to concede.

This is because the Supreme Court has ruled that, when a grant of regulatory authority «lay [s] down by legislative act an intelligible principle to which the person or body authorized to [act] is directed to conform», Congress is not unconstitutionally delegating its ability to make laws.

«We are grateful that Governor (Andrew) Cuomo and Attorney General (Eric) Schneiderman have made clear that they intend to fight this cruel decision in court, and as advocates for ensuring that all New York students are protected and supported, we join Chancellor Rosa and Education Commissioner Elia in their call to «continue to fight for our Dreamers because it is the right thing to do.»»

I am asking that the Supreme Court apply the necessary sanctions, according to the law, to these individuals because looking at their conduct, one realizes that these comments were made deliberately and it was an attempt to undermine the dignity of the cCourt apply the necessary sanctions, according to the law, to these individuals because looking at their conduct, one realizes that these comments were made deliberately and it was an attempt to undermine the dignity of the courtcourt.

Once they have made that pronouncement, never would the executive under section 5 headed by Mr. President which execute laws made by the National Assembly under section 5 of the constitution nor the legislature which is bicamerally controlled by the Senate President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, none of them has the power to tell a court of law that the bail you have granted we are not obeying it because of that hallowed doctrine of the separation of powers.

The court (ICC) in determining the case struck out the Application made to it for arbitration because the court has established that the 2006 contract (signed between Waterville and the Government of Ghana) on which basis he (Woyome) is coming to them does not meet their «minimum requirement» because he (Woyome) * is not a beneficiary, not a signatory, and not a party to the 2006 contract signed between Waterville and the Government of Ghana....

His statement said, «It is important to note that Justices Ngwuta and Okoro have alleged that they are the targets of a witch hunt because they refused offers of inducement and bribes made to them by the Minister of Transport, Rotimi Amaechi; and the Minister of Science and Technology, Ogbonnaya Onu, to subvert justice in appeals against the decisions of lower courts in election petitions in Abia, Akwa Ibom, Ekiti and Rivers states.

Steven Stites, a Storobin spokesman, said Felder was trying to blow up an innocent mistake because his own petitions are «rife with fraud,» a claim Storobin's campaign has not made in court.

Courts have refused to entertain legal action based on statements made in evidence before a committee because such statements are protected by parliamentary privilege.