Sentences with phrase «make it to court for»

It's about the only way to ensure that you can make it to court for a given case without being quadruple booked.

In both cases, after the notice period has expired, an application must be made to the Court for an order in order to regain possession.

For the intended parents to become the legal parents of the child and for the transfer of Parental Responsibility to them, an application must be made to the Court for a Parental Order.

Where the parents have not been married to each other, an application can still be made to the court for a housing fund to pay for a home for the children to live in.

If a party is not complying with the orders made, an application can be made to the court for enforcement.

Too few legitimate cases make it to court for all kinds of reasons, including not only limits on state AG's ability to hire contingency fee attorneys but also the hundreds if not thousands of so - called «tort reforms» that have passed since the 1980s.

(1) This rule applies if an application is made to the Court for a parenting order by consent in relation to a family law proceeding.

Note 2: For additional obligations when an application is made to the Court for a parenting order by consent, see rule 13.04 A.

If a party is not complying with the orders made, an application can be made to the court for enforcement.

If a parent who has their own business reports a low income, application can be made to the court for discovery of the parent's bank accounts and income tax returns.

Not exact matches

This is a logical extension of the company's «acceptable ads» scheme and a new way in which Adblock Plus can make money from that program — a useful move for the company due to a recent court ruling in its home country of Germany.

Google may be somewhat late to the cloud services party, but the search giant is making up for lost time now with a full - court press.

A California Supreme Court ruling on Monday will make it easier for workers in the gig economy, like Uber drivers or TaskRabbit gofers, to claim they are employees as opposed to independent contractors.

And some federal court rulings make it difficult for local jails to hold immigrants beyond their criminal sentences or strictly for immigration violations.

Part of the reason, and what's up for review before SCOTUS in Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness, is that patent law was originally written to protect the patent holder, making it easier for the patent holder to prevail in court.

Because the case was tied up in court for years, he said, the narrative from the Democratic side ended up being about how unfair and difficult the law made it for many to vote.

And in some circumstances, if one party refuses to disclose their cryptocurrency holdings, the court can make an award heavily in favor of the other party to make up for it.

Generally speaking, lawyers say you should try fighting back now, or at least find a way to delay settling until the summer, when a favorable court decision, as well as pending legislation before Congress that would make trolls responsible for court costs, could work in your favor.

«For the record, we wish to make it clear that as we start this trial David Baazov and his counsel have not been given by the AMF or this court the time necessary to review the millions of documents disclosed and judged potentially relevant,» she said.

«Bounce has infringed and continues to infringe the» 327 Patent by making, selling, offering for sale, importing and / or using software and services in an infringing manner,» Yieldify's court filings allege.

In exchange for their severance packages, employees would be required to be on call for two years, making themselves available for meetings, court deposition and phone calls to discuss matters related to their previous work with the company.

A flood of money from outside groups - a result of the 2010 Supreme Court ruling Citizens United - created a «huge cacophony of television» in the final months of the campaign, making it harder for any one message to stand out.

The attorneys for McClendon's estate argued that making the assets public now could hurt the estate, according to the court transcript.

The auction was triggered by a recent $ 300 - million stalking horse offer Fairfax made that allowed others to make competing bids for the Canadian operations until Monday at 10 a.m. EST, but court filings showed no bidders other than Fairfax registered an offer.

LONDON — A bakery owned by a Christian family asked Britain's Supreme Court on Tuesday to overturn a ruling that it discriminated against a gay customer for refusing to make a cake supporting same - sex marriage.

LONDON (AP)-- A bakery owned by a Christian family asked Britain's Supreme Court on Tuesday to overturn a ruling that it discriminated against a gay customer for refusing to make a cake supporting same - sex marriage.

Workplace whoopee has remained a hot topic since the 1998 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth, which makes it easier for employees to file sexual - harassment lawsuits even if they can't show significant job - related consequences.

At all the companies mentioned above, for example, hardly anyone has a title; workers are empowered to make decisions without consulting (or courting) a boss.

The accusations, made in a filing late Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, are counterclaims to a Qualcomm lawsuit filed in May seeking to force the contractors to pay Qualcomm license fees that Apple directed them to stop paying.

This week, the U.S. district court judge slapped the stingy content - marketing firm with a fine of $ 1.75 million to make it right with workers it forced to forgo pay while using the toilet and for taking other short personal breaks.

It also would create an advocate to the FISA court, where surveillance requests are made, to ensure civil liberties and allow for faster appeals of decisions by that secret court.

It may still be in trouble in California courts, though, which is where Damore says he'll next pursue his former employer under a law which makes it illegal to fire someone for complaining about illegal activity.

US prosecutors have asked the court to «make a strenuous inquiry into whether the defendant is financially unable to afford counsel» in order to prevent taxpayers from «needlessly» paying for the defense of man reputed to be worth billions.

Anything from the court that encourages the government to make its rules clearer is probably good for entrepreneurs.

The final sale price is expected to be well north of a billion dollars, which would make it the largest real estate transaction in Canadian history — possibly double the previous record of $ 618 million that CIBC fetched in 2000 for its Commerce Court complex in Toronto.

Part of what makes fair use cases so difficult is that there are multiple factors a court has to consider: One is the nature of the work (i.e., whether it is a commercial work), the second is the purpose of the use — specifically, whether it is «transformative» — the third is the amount of the original work used, and the fourth is the effect of the use on the market for the original product.

The share price for the company did go up about 25 % between 13 and 22 May, according to the court — trading volume increased over 17 times — but then the price dropped back 15 % on 23 May when the Porter - hyped announcement was not made on 22 May.

In a terse decision, Judge Gregory A. Presnell of the United States District Court in Orlando rejected the former workers» arguments that Disney and the two contractors had colluded to make false statements when they applied for temporary visas, known as H - 1B, for the foreign replacements.

In April 2014, however, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. to make it easier for the courts to impose legal costs on losers.

The state's highest court made it much harder for companies like Uber to classify workers as contractors rather than employees.

Canada Alleged serial killer Bruce McArthur to make court appearance today, Globe and Mail Parole key in judge's sentence for men in Alberta triple murder of family, Canadian Press Liberals to propose jury selection changes after meeting with Colten Boushie's family, Toronto Star

Will the SEC take this opportunity to clarify that same - sex couples in civil unions, domestic partnerships, and similar legal relationships intended to give them at least some of the economic benefits of marriage, are «spouses» to one another, and thus eligible for the alternative accredited investor qualification standard made available to persons who are married (with the Supreme Court's recent decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA, it is already clear that persons in same - sex marriages are «spouses» to one another)?

After the Supreme Court in 1911 struck down the form of resale price maintenance enabled by fair trade laws, 59 Congress in 1937 carved out an exception for state fair trade laws through the Miller - Tydings Act.60 When the Supreme Court in 1951 ruled that producers could enforce minimum prices only against those retailers that had signed contracts agreeing to do so, 61 Congress responded with a law making minimum prices enforceable against nonsigners too.62

«But once people started to understand what he was going to do — he made jobs [for residents] and isn't over-developing, but is fixing the [community] gymnasium and put in basketball courts — well, now he has a large group that supports him.»

Canada's Federal Court could be given greater powers to combat unacceptable behaviour by domestic and foreign «patent trolls» — companies that do not make or sell a product but sue other companies for patent infringement based on existing patent rights the troll has secured.

«Your profile is so high that the court has to make an example for the public,» Lefcourt said.

In re HP Securities Litigation consists of two consolidated putative class actions filed on November 26 and 30, 2012 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging, among other things, that from August 19, 2011 to November 20, 2012, the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act by concealing material information and making false statements related to Parent's acquisition of Autonomy and the financial performance of Parent's enterprise services business.

It probably won't make Wynne any more popular in Harper's eyes, and will be one more reason for him to avoid meeting with her, but it could also be the first shot in a Supreme Court challenge of the legislation, which could conceivably be much faster - tracked than it would be if we had to wait for a Charter challenge the traditional way, which could conceivably help save lives, going back to the thrust of the Bedford decision in the first place.

Court documents made public late on Tuesday show that Fresenius (NYSE: FMS) dropped its acquisition of Akorn after uncovering evidence that the generic drug developer submitted fraudulent data to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for at least six different drugs dating back to 2012.

Even if regulators do not act, when a presale results in nothing more than profits for its promoter, a disgruntled investor will inevitably make a private securities fraud claim to try and claw back some of their capital; assuming a court will determine a presale of digital tokens to be a private placement of securities, any such federal claim would fall under Rule 10b - 5.