Sentences with phrase «make it to your court date»

Not exact matches

Court documents made public late on Tuesday show that Fresenius (NYSE: FMS) dropped its acquisition of Akorn after uncovering evidence that the generic drug developer submitted fraudulent data to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for at least six different drugs dating back to 2012.

We talk about why kids shouldn't be the center of your life, discuss the importance of a regular date night, hear a tense couple's court case, find out how to make a family mission statement and a lot more!

Attorneys representing all current and former NCAA student - athletes announced date changes made by the court, affecting the concussions settlement that will provide a 50 - year medical - monitoring program for student - athletes to screen for post-concussion syndrome and early - onset neurodegenerative disease that may have resulted from concussions or the accumulation of subconcussive hits while playing NCAA sports.

Having generated an approving cheer in relation to the unequal formal departure date she dared to tell none other than the deified Jacob Rees Mogg that the European Court would inevitably have some jurisdiction during the transition phase, or what she calls the implementation phase (a phrase coined by David Davis to make the process seem more positive).

The Registrar of the court in which a compulsory treatment order or any order under section 24 or 34 of the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 is made or in which any person is convicted of a corrupt practice must, not later than the fifth day of the month following the date of the order or conviction, forward to the Electoral Commission a certificate showing --

The court did not change the date for state and local elections because it was not empowered to make that change.

The people of Ghana should demand to know from Government how its Attorney General can — in enforcing the order of the Supreme Court for Woyome to refund the unconstitutional payments made to Woyome to the Republic of Ghana — accept a cheque of GHC4, 000,000.00 drawn by Woyome dated 4th November 2016 in favour of the Economic and Organized Crime Office as part payment of the monies ordered by the Court to be refunded.

(4) The independent panel shall report as approved for each judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no other applicants shall be reported as approved for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).

And that «if payments have been made to the 2nd and 3rd Defendants under agreements other the two * dated 26th April 2006 *, which were terminated, issues relating to those payments would have to be determined in a forum other than this Court (Supreme Court) and in a different action, since they do not come within the issue of constitutional interpretation raised by the Plaintiff's writ».

The court held that the Plaintiff has made more than sufficient references to the specific allegations, the dates and times were made plus the specific radio / media platforms on which the allegations were made by Defendants against the Plaintiff.

In his writ filed on Friday, Mr Amidu, popularly known as Citizen Vigilante, said: «I oppose the application for stay of proceeding on the main ground that it discloses no reasonable ground or grounds for the making of an application for stay of proceedings to this Court pending the discharge or reversal of the ruling order of this Court dated 16th November 2016 aforesaid to warrant its consideration by this Court.»

«That you, lsah Hamman Misau of Hamman Misau Residence, Turaki Street, Misau, Bauchi State, on or about August 10, 2017, at Abuja and other part of Nigeria within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, did make a false statement of fact to wit: that police officers pay as much as two million, five hundred thousand naira (N2.5 m) to get special promotion and posting through the Police Service Commission as published in the Daily Trust Newspaper dated August 10, 2017, knowing that such false statement of fact would harm the reputation of Mr. Ibrahim Kpotun ldris (the serving Inspector - General of Police), the Nigeria Police Force and the Police Service Commission and you thereby committed an offense.

A new form that makes the court appearance date easier to understand along with reminders and more flexible scheduling are some of the changes.

Up to Date Interiors Savvy Southern Style Craftberry Bush French Country Cottage Chic on a Shoestring Remodelaholic DIY Showoff Funky Junk Interiors Finding Silver Pennies Home Stories A to Z Naptime Creations Worthing Court Colors + Craft Making it in the Mountains Little Bits of Home Abbotts at Home

A cultural day always makes an interesting date, so why not take your sweetheart to Emo Court House to explore the house and gardens?

Sites such as MyMatchChecker.com, ValiMate, Date Check make it easier to check out your date during the courting staDate Check make it easier to check out your date during the courting stadate during the courting stages.

The High Court rejected claims made by US online dating company Plentyoffish Media that it was entitled to assert rights over UK - registered trademarks because it had high UK visitor numbers to its website.

Actually, it's not easy to make someone contented and asking out on a date is one way of courting someone.

In Dec» 13, India's Supreme Court found the law, which dates to the British colonial era, wasn't unconstitutional and could be changed or repealed only by Parliament, effectively overturning a 2009 lower - court ruling that made consensual gay sex lCourt found the law, which dates to the British colonial era, wasn't unconstitutional and could be changed or repealed only by Parliament, effectively overturning a 2009 lower - court ruling that made consensual gay sex lcourt ruling that made consensual gay sex legal.

It is quite startling how humankind has made this break from ordinary courting to dating and cyber love.

Before we go any further, let's have a look at the dictionary definitions of courting vs. dating to make things clear: Courtship (noun): The act, period or art of seeking the love of someone with the intent to marry or stay together for life.

Member comply with directions of the courts dating sites for divorced professionals or enforcement are working to get clients in order to create a schedule that makes.

The state supreme court has 60 days from the date of filing to make a decision if they will hear the case, plus the option of a 30 - day extension, Lipshutz said.

The creditor can apply for a charging order against your home (if it is mortgaged), even if you are up to date with the payments that the court ordered you to make.

First, the court wants to know how much you've made in each of the last 2 years and your year - to - date income (Statement of Financial Affairs 1).

It makes no difference if your creditor is threatening to garnish your wages, has set a date to make a court application or served a garnishment order on your employer.

Keeping up to date with the payments a court has told you to make stops creditors from using most kinds of enforcement.

On request of a creditor with a claim secured by the single asset real estate and after notice and a hearing, the court will grant relief from the automatic stay to the creditor unless the debtor files a feasible plan of reorganization or begins making interest payments to the creditor within 90 days from the date of the filing of the case, or within 30 days of the court's determination that the case is a single asset real estate case.

The opt - out process involves the Court making orders that notice must be given to group members of the right to opt out of the class action before a specified date.

However, if you wish to make these arrangements on your own, please contact the Registry Department before you leave home to secure a licensed person and court date to perform a legal ceremony.

Where a variable PPO is made, it follows that the court remains seized of its jurisdiction to consider any application to review the level of the payments at a future date should the contingency materialise.

Jon Baines, a data protection advisor at Mishcon de Reya, said the ruling suggests the courts will judge «right to be forgotten» cases on their specific facts and that there is likely to be «an increase in the number of successful requests for delisting, as individuals take note of the court's analysis, and assert their strong and potentially enforceable rights to have out - of - date or inaccurate information about them on the internet made more difficult, at least, to find».

Here is Sacks» post from yesterday summarizing his experience to date on how visitors can make sure they get a seat at Supreme Court arguments.

Included in the final Decree were changes to the temporary family support awarded prior to the court proceedings that were made effective prior to the date on which Eitan filed a petition requesting a modification.

[58] At the conclusion of the hearing on March 5, having been made aware that the passage of time was critical because of the potential for the memory of the plaintiff's family computer to be «overwritten» with ongoing use, I directed that within two weeks of that date, an expert engaged by the plaintiff's counsel, at the expense of the defence, produce two copies of the hard drive to be deposited with the court pending this ruling.

By order dated July 14, 2014, the motion judge, the Honourable Justice Martin S. James of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, granted Mr. Arnone's motion for summary judgment and ordered Best Theratronics to pay (i) damages equal to the gross amount of the salary Arnone would have earned until he qualified for an unreduced pension, less payments made to him to satisfy the statutory obligations of the employer, (ii) $ 65,000 representing the present value of the loss of an unreduced pension, (iii) a retirement allowance equal to 30 weeks» pay, and (iv) costs totaling $ 52,280.09.

«(1) On an application for relief from any sanction imposed for a failure to comply with any rule... the court will consider all the circumstances including --(a) the interests of the administration of justice; (b) whether the application for relief has been made promptly; (c) whether the failure to comply was intentional; (d) whether there is a good explanation for the failure; (e) the extent to which the party in default has complied with other rules,...; (f) whether the failure to comply was caused by the party or the party's legal representative; (g) whether the hearing date... can still be met if relief is granted; (h) the effect which the failure to comply had on each party; and (i) the effect which the granting of relief would have on each party or a child whose interest the court considers relevant.

The court is to have regard to all the circumstances of the case including: the withdrawal grounds relied on and whether or not new evidence has come to light which was not available when the admission was made; the conduct of the parties including any conduct which led to the admission being made, any prejudice that may be caused if the admission is withdrawn and if withdrawal is refused, the stage in the proceedings at which the application to withdraw is made, in particular in relation to the trial date; the prospects of success (if withdrawal) for the claimant; and the interests of the administration of justice.

«Changes have been made but old dates, references to former presidents and inconsistent language remains, which is a shame when the intention is to make the court system more intelligible to litigants in person,» Morris writes in this week's NLJ.

The Austrian law provided that in the event of failure to disclose accounting documents at the latest within nine months of the balance sheet date, the court responsible for maintaining the commercial register had to impose a minimum periodic penalty of 700 Euros on the company concerned, without prior notice or allowing the company an opportunity to make its views known.

Section 284 of IA 1986 provides that where a person is adjudged bankrupt, any disposition made during the period beginning with the date of the presentation of the petition (in this case 9 March 2009) and ending with the vesting of the bankrupt's estate in a trustee in bankruptcy will be void unless subject to the court's earlier approval or subsequent ratification.

The court can still make the order after this time if it sets a date for a hearing on whether to make the order within 90 days of imposing the sentence, making the finding of not criminally responsible, or discharging the person.

The POA also made it possible to plead «guilty with an explanation» without needing to attend court at a set date and time.

Acted for the Defendant school governing body, opposing an application made by the Headteacher for an injunction to compel completion of a contractual disciplinary procedure by a certain date (in the High Court, Chancery Division).

This applies both where that advice is limited in time, eg until after a criminal defence statement has been filed and served and, worse still, the advice is given not to make such a response at all; • (f) the date on which a party to care proceedings is to file and serve a criminal defence statement in linked criminal proceedings is wholly irrelevant to the court's determination of the date on which that party should file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement in the care proceedings; • (g) the mere fact that a party is ordered to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served in criminal proceedings is not a ground for failing to comply with the former order; • (h) it [is not] a ground for an application to extend the time for compliance with an order to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement until a date after the criminal defence statement has been filed and served; and • (i) any issue about alleged prejudice to a defendant in criminal proceedings based on him being required to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date of a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served, or at all, only arises and is only potentially relevant if and when an application is made by the police and / or a co-accused for statements and documents filed in the family proceedings to be disclosed into linked criminal proceedings [see Re C (A Minor)(Care Proceedings: Disclosure)[1997] Fam 76, [1997] 2 WLR 322, sub nom Re EC (Disclosure of Material)[1996] 2 FLR 725, CA].

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) purposively interpreted the Data Protection Directive to try to keep it up to date with the rapid technological change that has unfolded since it was made into law.

To date, modifications made by Canadian courts have been entirely in the area of defences (i.e., introducing a «responsible communication on matters of public interest» defence7 and expanding the availability of the fair comment defence8).

When read together, ss 272 and 282 of IA 1986 made it clear that a court could annul a bankruptcy order if it concluded that, on the date of that order, the bankrupt was able to pay his debts.

The Senate has already indicated (through a pre-study report by the Standing Committee on Legal and constitutional Affairs and comments made to the media by numerous Senators), that it will not be willing or able to conduct its Committee process and then consideration by the full Senate by the June 6th deadline (the date on which the Supreme Court of Canada's Carter 2016 extension on the suspension of the declaration of invalidity expires).

``... we wish to take this opportunity to make it clear that if a party brings such a motion to this court within three weeks of the hearing of the appeal, the judge hearing the motion in chambers must be told of the date on which the appeal is to be heard.