Certain legal writing «experts» suggest that all citations be placed in footnotes in order to
make judicial opinions more readable for the general public.
Not exact matches
«In 2012 alone over 250
judicial opinions — more than double the number in 2007 — cited defendants arguing in some form or another that their «brains
made them do it,»» according to an analysis by Nita Farahany, a law professor and director of Duke University's Initiative for Science and Society.
Every legal researcher has come across the phrase in a
judicial opinion, «It is well settled that...,» or, «It is axiomatic that...» In 2014, I wrote about a prototype legal research website that mined
opinions for instances of these phrases and
made them searchable as a way of helping researchers find statements of -LSB-...]
Noting that would add up to 67 percent of the estate's total value, the Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court
made no bones about its
opinion on the fee request, saying that it represented «unnecessary lawyering.»
It would
make a useful addition to the training of externs and clerks in a
judicial opinion writing course.
That the bill presents a case for
judicial consideration arising under the laws of the United States and treaties
made under their authority with the Cherokee Nation, and which laws and treaties have been, and are threatened to be still further, violated by the laws of the State of Georgia referred to in this
opinion.
Again, the narrow focus of this article and its age would not
make it useful in training externs and clerks in a
judicial opinion writing course.
The seventeen - page section on preparing
judicial opinions considers purpose and audience and
makes recommendations regarding writing style, the drafting process, and editing.
It
makes a thoughtful supplement to a text, excerpts, or articles on the skill of writing
judicial opinions, writing from a judge's perspective, and learning about the audiences for
opinions.
Professor Kimble, the champion of plain language, advocates that judges
make more extensive use of «deep issue» summaries / thesis statements at the beginning of
judicial opinions.
It also addresses the issue of the audience for
opinions,
making the article appropriate for
judicial opinion writing courses.
Excerpts on the decision to publish and whether to issue summary affirmances might be helpful in training externs and clerks in a
judicial opinion writing course to give the students background in some of the decisions judges must
make in addition to how to decide cases and write the
opinions.
The project aims to
make judicial elections more transparent for journalists and researchers by creating online profiles of judges that show campaign contributions,
judicial opinions and biographies.
Making distinctions like this between categories of decision - maker in substantive
judicial review is, in my
opinion, a step in the wrong direction.
And while there are many who believe that
judicial opinions that use verse, quote song lyrics, or
make TV or movie references somehow detract from the dignity of the bench or disrespect parties who take the issues very seriously, let's not forget that judges owe a duty to write
opinions that are accessible to all.
If the student understood how a
judicial opinion was created, how legislation was produced, how administrative rules and regulations were
made, then she could deal with these materials in any format.
Courts have a harder time
making these distinctions because
judicial conventions mandate that they give reasons to support their
opinions, and what principled reason could there be for giving 50 of the 1,000 rights of marriage but not another 25 or 100 or all of them?
We're doing a decent job of that in Canada as our various jurisdictions
make their legislation and
judicial opinions increasingly available in digitized formats... [more]
Indeed, judges» personal
opinions are presumed to be non-factors in
judicial decision
making as judges are charged to uphold the letter of the law regardless of their personal beliefs.
«A diverse judiciary results in a broader range of perspectives, which is crucial in
judicial decision -
making,» write two other lawyers in an
opinion piece in the Toronto Star newspaper.
While the non-citation rule prohibits citation to any unpublished
opinion,
judicial notice pursuant to California Evidence Code section 452 (d)(1) may be
made as to the «[r] ecords of any court of this state...» On its face, this statute allows
judicial notice of any
opinion of the Court of Appeal as a record of a court of this state.
Aug. 6, 2002): Canon 5 (1) of the Texas Code of
Judicial Conduct prohibited candidates from making «statements that indicate an opinion on any issue that may be subject to judicial interpretation by the office which is being sought
Judicial Conduct prohibited candidates from
making «statements that indicate an
opinion on any issue that may be subject to
judicial interpretation by the office which is being sought
judicial interpretation by the office which is being sought.»
I suspect that the Commission, after a few years of experience, will want and need to
make significant revisions to eliminate many of these «bugs,» and I think that
judicial sentencing
opinions may be the best way to memorialize the problems requiring revisions.
(4) If the
Judicial Council is of the
opinion that the judge should be compensated, it shall
make a recommendation to the Attorney General to that effect, indicating the amount of compensation.
Students will also practice basic lawyering skills to provide a taste of what they would do in law school or as lawyers, including reading and interpreting constitutional provisions, statutes, or regulations, reading and understanding
judicial opinions, and mapping out and
making basic forms of legal arguments.
(5) The judge, while a judge or a
judicial candidate, has
made a public statement, other than in a court proceeding,
judicial decision, or
opinion, that commits or appears to commit the judge to reach a particular result or rule in a particular way in the proceeding or controversy.
For those interested in embedding
opinion content into existing theories of
judicial decision
making... consider Yonatan Lupu & James Fowler's paper recently posted to the SSRN.
Simply put,
judicial opinions «
make law» when judges are bound by the doctrine of stare decisis to follow these
opinions» reasoning in later cases.
See, e.g., Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of the
Judicial Process 57 - 58 (1921)(«Stare decisis is at least the everyday working rule of our law... [A judge
makes law through issuing
opinions because] in fashioning [the law for the parties to a case], he will be fashioning it for others.»).
Judicial opinions on when a child can be tried as an adult vary widely, and frequently depend on measures of children's physical development, contrary to international standards, which call upon states to
make determinations of adult competence based on «emotional, mental and intellectual maturity,» and not the child's physical maturity.
BUT — I can think of at least one commenter on Pink Tape who
makes valuable contributions from time to time but does so anonymously in order not to compromise his / her
judicial impartiality, and at least one commenter on Pink Tape who does so quite openly, drawing on
judicial experience to back up
opinion.