If you only use a card for optimal use scenarios, card issuers
make less money because you are reducing the average return on each transaction.
I wanted to make this point for readers that
make less money because if I read the post above and made $ 60K per year, I'd find it kind of discouraging.
White says, «Women - owned businesses do not
make less money because they are women - owned.
Our tax burden was lower than planned for because of several reasons, including getting sweet new tax deductions for having a baby,
making less money because of the maternity leave, and our decision to shove as much money as possible into my HSA (Health Savings Account) and our Traditional IRAs.
Not exact matches
As I recall the headline read, more or
less, «Women Don't Negotiate
Because They're Not Dumb,» and the author went on to cite research to
make her point that when women do ask for more
money, people tend to hate it, and «pushy» women end up paying mightily in terms of career progression and opportunities.
In all of the above cases the entrepreneur who is susceptible to the confirmation bias will look for information and analyze it in a way that will yield: 1) fewer competitors rather than more,
because it increases the viability of the start - up, 2) underestimation of the capabilities of the competition
because stronger competitors will
make life harder for the entrepreneur, 3) view of the company's product as fully addressing the needs of the customer
because otherwise the start - up is at a weaker position in the marketplace, and 4) need for
less resources rather than more
because it generally
makes raising the
money easier.
I resisted reading it for a long time
because I figured it would be full of self - affirmational claptrap, and there is some of that, but it's mainly about a simple financial truism: no matter how much
money you
make, the only way to get rich is to spend much
less than you earn.
Because it's been
less than three years since
money was contributed to the RRSP, the $ 10,000 is added not to your spouse's income but to yours since it is essentially the income you weren't taxed on when you
made the contribution.
Even if an actively managed fund also achieves a 23 percent return, the index fund will still
make you more
money,
because you're paying
less in fees.
Here's why: I know that if people get more business from LinkedIn
because of what I'm showing them, it's going to help them
make more
money in
less time, and that in turn will give them more time to do what they love and have a better life — travel more, get more family time... whatever that might be.
For example, according to Strachan, a man who
makes less money than his wife or chooses to serve the family as a stay - at - home dad is a «man fail»
because «men are called to be leaders, providers, protectors and women are nurturers.»
Yeah
because the $ 35,000 a year or
less that 90 % of preachers
make for having to spiritually and emotionally guide people is so about just being in it for the
money.
Bobby next door has been told he'll pay $ 2000 / year
because his parents
make less money.
Think about that,
because Romney can care
less about anyone who can't do nothing for him to
make more
money and if you don't see that you should ask the lord for help
because you are blind and walking through the wilderness...
Rock Cakes are a traditional British treat, commonly baked in households with
less money — purely
because they were rather inexpensive to
make.
I didn't realize that quinoa has become
less available to the peoples of South America
because it
makes more
money being sold overseas, but it
makes sense.
That's why the Niners are so high — it's
because a bunch of silly Niner fanboy
money is on them to go all the way so they lower the odds to
make it
less enticing to bet more on them and / or decrease the payout if they do win the SB.
Alas, I wish you all to care
less and
less about Arsenal,
because it's only getting worse and there are much better things to do in life than bother for a sorry
money -
making excuse of a football club.
Because next season will prove that you can still
make a lot of
money with even
less risk and lower wages, due to having no top players (yes I'm beyond sure Sanchez and Ozil will move out).
Usmanov mentions
less popular sports like volleyball,
because maybe investments are sometimes
made for the love of the sport, not for the
money it brings.
The Cubs can spend
money on Tyler Chatwood, Steve Cishek, and Brandon Morrow
because they have a stable of young players
making less than they're worth.
The owner (Kronke) could care
less about the running
because he knows shit about English football and as long as he
makes money..
@ larryking listen jock wenger could never coach anyother club
because no big club would go six season without a trophy there is no way wenger could go to madrid and go two season without a trophy no way in hell he would be fired in no time bmunich fired klinsman
less than half season look at the real madrid coach grave yard pelligrinie
made 95 + points last season that amount would win the league in almost any country yet he got fired i can go on if fergi goes two seasons without a trophy am sure he gone i love arsenal but football is about winning trophies wenger has hypnotize you i do nt care arsenal have gone five years without a trophy and six witout the league not even a carling cup or fa cup and loosing all our best players all for
money all this talk about wenger and his youth policies i can count on both hands all the players that came through arsenal youth system that went on to be world beaters look at the current crop walcott nasri diaby denilson bedtner clichy none of these are world class they have improve minimal @ arsenal compare that to barca their youths pedro and co are world beaters event the great vanpercy who we rate he would never leave arsenal
because all that chance wenger gives him he would» t get at other big clubs this does not
make sense we buy young players they take ages to develop most do nt» t then we sell them or they leave
because they want to win things that how you grow pretty soon that top four will become very hard to stay in if we get out of that then what i wish all you wenger fans luck am all out of patients with him last chance this year................
So yes you
make less money but it is
because you deserve to.
Women
make less money than men
because they won't do the dirty, dangerous jobs or jobs with long hours and they don't want to relocate.
And in none of these conversations did anyone even suggest that they
made a medical decision
because of
money (in fact my sister actively avoids over-doing tests, etc even though she knows she could be
making more
money), nor do they suggest the patient is anything
less than a feeling human being.
I'm a big advocate in
making baby food, not only
because of the health benefits with
less preservatives, but also
because you save tons of
money by doing so.
Proponents, however, predict that even more people will work,
because the current welfare system actively discourages welfare receivers from taking small jobs (if you
make less money per month than you get welfare, that
money is subtracted from welfare, so you end up with the same amount of income whether you work or not) and that the reason for unemployment is rather lack of jobs than lack of people's motivation to take them.
It is nothing
less than a national scandal that many profitable and wanted pubs are being closed, simply
because owners seek to cash in and
make money from the pub, be it by applying to develop the pub or site, or by selling it to Tesco, with communities having little or no chance to stop this.
«Unfortunately (women) may be
less powerful and
make less money and run fewer companies, but they're not
less important, and they may be more important
because they're the soul and well - being of our communities.»
Families moving into the town
because of the award winning school district, district wide Universal Pre-Kindergarten, organic diversity, a mix of urban and suburban life, coupled with a big inventory of affordable homes has flooded the schools and left the district scrambling to
make ends meet with
less money.
The study's participants did not like the pain of receiving a shock,
because they were willing to
make about $ 0.30
less money per shock on average to receive fewer of them.
The backstory about why I merged my own Wellness Mama Meals system with Real Plans (
because I knew the technology was so much better and even though I
make much
less money, my readers are so much happier!)
No matter who got the shocks — the computer told the decider who would get the shocks — the decider always got the
money -LSB-...] The study's participants did not like the pain of receiving a shock,
because they were willing to
make about $ 0.30
less money per shock on average to receive fewer of them.
I can't help it, I feel like highlighting palettes are great gifts
because they're kinda extravagant (I mean, more so than a tube of mascara) and your average girl is
less likely to spend her hard earned
money on a whole palette dedicated to one product — hence why it
makes a good gift.
I think that plenty of fish specifically doesn't upgrade their user experience in fact
because the better they are the
less likely their users are to switch to a paid dating site via their ads and
make them a large portion of their
money.
Lydia wants to be a stage actress, a career choice her mother finds
less than ideal,
because actresses don't
make a lot of
money.
I agree but now they will
make even
less money because a lot of people will not care about the Wii U version anymore by the time it's released.
However teachers hear all the time that they have to
make due with
less because there isn't enough
money for what we know we need to promote success for our students.
Because writers have the tools and the readership, they're relying
less on traditional publishers — and they can
make much more
money than they ever could have through traditional publishers.
This hurts publishers
because they
make less money, it hurts writers
because they can not share their passions through the largest outlets, it hurts readers
because it could have chilling effects on the quality of writing in the long run, and it will almost certainly cement Amazon's long - term dominance.
When I tell these would - be authors the truth of the matter, as I have learned being in and around the publishing business for over twenty years, they decide that they should buy a few more lottery tickets
because they have a better chance at
making big
money doing that, and it's a lot
less work.
And that's why indie writers are
making more
money in the field than major publishers,
because not only are they offering more books that hit more specific tastes, but Internet - savvy writers also charge far
less.
(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and
money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I
make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going
because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold,
because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to
less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.
It was the only kind of deal publishers would sign (for lots of good reasons, and some
less less good reasons), but that did not
make the economics stack up any better: the writing was on the wall back in July when rival subscription company Scribd culled a range of romance and erotica titles from its service
because they were costing the company too much
money.
If profit is the problem, perhaps if the producers didn't price them so unreasonably high, we would be buying them instead of checking them out from the library for free — they will definitely
make less money if no one buys them at all
because they cost more than solid gold.
Con: Lowered Revenue You will
make less money per purchase
because the revenue split is different.
Moreover, if your contention that an item that
makes Amazon
less profit disappears altogether were true, none of our indie books would be present,
because there are other e-books out there that
make Amazon much more
money.
Pulp fiction was where authors started out
because it paid
less than «traditional» markets (they were mostly short stories), but with indie novels, I think (some) authors are
making more
money than comparable traditional publishing contracts (and I see some trad - pub authors supplementing their income with self - pub, which is also similar to some of the pulp fiction writers of the past).
The music industry is
making a lot
less money now than it was 20 years ago, partly
because of copyright infringement.