It would be a disadvantage to mutual fund companies to include it in retirement accounts because they would
make less money per year on it.
Con: Lowered Revenue You will
make less money per purchase because the revenue split is different.
For my lifetime career as an author, I would always rather reach more readers, even if
I make less money per reader.
Add into the mix the fact that publishers have admitted
they make less money per title under the agency model than they did before and you have the answer to who is harmed.
Proponents, however, predict that even more people will work, because the current welfare system actively discourages welfare receivers from taking small jobs (if
you make less money per month than you get welfare, that money is subtracted from welfare, so you end up with the same amount of income whether you work or not) and that the reason for unemployment is rather lack of jobs than lack of people's motivation to take them.
If one puts in more hours than the other, then
he makes less money per hour than his colleague.
It will allow you access to more venues even if
it makes you less money per unit.
Another factor that Amazon doesn't mention is that
it makes less money per e-book than it does on print books, and in some cases is losing money on e-books.
They are doing fewer transactions and
making less money per transaction.
Not exact matches
I wanted to
make this point for readers that
make less money because if I read the post above and
made $ 60K
per year, I'd find it kind of discouraging.
The study's participants did not like the pain of receiving a shock, because they were willing to
make about $ 0.30
less money per shock on average to receive fewer of them.
No matter who got the shocks — the computer told the decider who would get the shocks — the decider always got the
money -LSB-...] The study's participants did not like the pain of receiving a shock, because they were willing to
make about $ 0.30
less money per shock on average to receive fewer of them.
In any case, the higher costs put a major kink in the business side of the Madison Prep proposal and also
made it
less palatable to the district, which wants to limit the amount of
money per student it puts into Madison Prep beyond what it spends
per student in the rest of the district.
(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and
money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I
make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12
per book — a figure that works out to
less than $.50
per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.
So Amazon stands to
make more
money per unit of a new release sold, but
less for backlist titles and non-new releases.
That publishers, who are in financial distress,
made a good decision to adopt a pricing model that brings in
less money per title.
I'll sell
less print books, but they
make more
money, probably about $ 4
per book.
By cutting out the middlemen who take the vast majority of the
money, self - publishers can often simultaneously charge readers a lot
less for a book while still
making a greater profit
per book.
«Would that
make me
less money and is KU's subscription service viable (with the new
per - page thing)?
The problem with doing this is that — while you
make more
money per sale — you're diluting the KU pool, meaning everyone else gets
less.
Since the production cost on an ebook is next to nothing, it's not like the publishers lose
money when they are priced lower, they just
make less of it
per unit.
My hope as a reader is that more authors use the current diversity in publishing options to bring a more affordable, professionally published products to market, because by eliminating the corporate publisher's take, they can actually
make more
money by charging significantly
less per book.
Robbers
made off with
less money on average, however, netting just $ 706
per crime.
Tradingmarkets contributor Austin Passamonte offers some advise on how to properly manage your portfolio and
make a lot more
money per trade in
less time.
3: Credit scores mean little to me if it is above 680 because I look at how much
money the borrower
makes more than any other criteria, if they
make less than 20 %
per month of the monthly payment it's a no - go.
If you earn $ 37,000 or
less per year, the government may
make a further contribution of up to $ 500 to your super to compensate you for contributions tax paid as your
money goes into super.
I just purchased chicken breasts for $.98
per pound......... bet I can
make a healthy version of jerky with no «special seasonings» for
less money.
The fourth is at the post-call stage when squads of
less well - trained new lawyers, unable to find jobs and saddled with debts that would
make US Congresspeople chew their nails to the knuckles, open their own firms and resort to churning, roiling and boiling their mostly family and civil litigation files to
make whatever
money they can however they can from a small, sliced and diced number of clients
per lawyer — ethics, wisdom, logic, and good sense be damned.
If they coulod do
less, they could handle more cases quicker, bill
less per individual case and still
make more
money in total.
For example, it aims to
make money from studios who want to target its customers with their marketing efforts, or access user data to learn about trends; it's taking a cut of ticket sales and concessions at some theaters; it has begun to acquire movies; and it hopes that eventually, users will slow down their movie - going to their usual once
per month (or
less), after the initial rush of having an all - you - can - watch subscription wears off.
Why would a Realtor who is already (by dint of his / her own efforts)
making a good living «without» giving away a significant percentage of his / her income on a deal - a-month-or-more standard then decide to start giving away significant
money in an effort to gain more business for «
less» income
per transaction... (has anyone heard of the negative economic principle known as «the principle of diminishing returns»?)
Less, but better prepared with subsequently better attitudinally equipped Realtors regarding professionalism will inevitably bring in the same amount of
money to the brokerage, only the rermaining, now ALL professional Realtors will actually
make more
money per Realtor.
the rationalization that as long as realtor X
makes more sales the better the sales person they are leads to how can I streamline my business to
make more
money out of each client with as little time and
money invested leads to
less service
per client... Reinvesting commission \ profits into personal promotion so eventually the informed client will feel they are not getting value for they
money they are paying in commission.
Being required to put more
money down and being able to use
less potential rental income for qualifying purposes will displace many new real estate investors (who currently only
make up around four
per cent of all mortgage consumers in Canada).
The brokerage was actually
making more
money transacting the same number of deals with the greater number of registrants completing
less transactions
per registrant.
Like the 9 - to - 5 grind, a whopping 2 weeks» vacation
per year, and not quite enough
money to pay the bills each month, much
less for any of the extras that
make life real special.