According to recent Airbnb data there are more than 15,000 hosts in Ontario that
make money off the sharing economy and more than half of these home - hosts are in metro Toronto.
But the company also is hoping to
make money off sharing the user data.
Not exact matches
Bezos's defenders, meanwhile, contend that the U.S. postal service is in fact
making a ton of
money off Amazon and that the company is paying its
share of taxes.
 The Harper government's decision last year to write
off every penny of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year's deficit calculation (which I questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already been proven wrong. Since the
money was already «written
off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it was an «investment,» not a bail - out), any repayment will come as a gain that can be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it's always politically better to
make the budget situation look worse than it is (even when the bottom has fallen out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth of the public equity
share).
To argue that the corporation's defining objective is «enhancing corporate profit and shareholder gain» leads, in his opinion, to unacceptable conclusions: «To say that a corporation's only goal is to
make money would be to define the business corporation — for the first time in American or English law as I understand it — as a kind of shark that lives
off of the community rather than as an important agency in the construction, maintenance, and transformation of our
shared lives.»
I've lately been taking the pressure
off of myself, thinking more along the lines you spoke of: I do this for me, because I have ideas and recipes worth
sharing, and not for some goal of
making money or having traffic.
Well you can now buy
shares in your favourite players and
make real
money off their success.
Wow, thank you for
sharing this and so looking into it, because we have a ton that we need to get rid of and
making a couple of bucks
off of it truly isn't a terrible thing (you are right we could use the
money, too!!).
I don't
make any
money off of anything, I'm just
sharing all that with you so you know that I haven't been doing it long enough to give some amazing testimonial, but so far I'm EXTREMELY pleased with several areas of my health that I've suffered with through the years of being «right» in my blood work but never right at all with all the symptoms.
The nonprofit High Tech High aims to
share its best practices openly, not
make money off them, so it posts a host of materials on its website for free.
In order to
make more
money off the Stream, which
shares its mechanicals with the CR - V and Civic, Honda is going to start selling the vehicle in the US.
Last September I wrote my first «Big Reveal» post and
shared with you exactly how many copies I'd sold of my self - published book Mousetrapped, and how much
money I was
making off those sales.
Questions such as, «How will an author
make money from her own work if everyone is simply downloading it for free
off an illegal
sharing website?»
Self - publishing offers a cost - effective way to
share your book with the masses and
make a bit of
money off of your writing.
As for royalty
shares, I would have to sift through hundreds of books, read them for commercial viability, and then work for free hoping a book takes
off — that puts far too much risk on me, takes far too much time, and there are easier ways to
make money... like writing my own books.
GAM said it previously
made a bid of $ 20 a
share for B&N and has said that the
money - losing Nook segment should be spun
off from the college and retail segment.
Most of the reasons involve the trustee's selling your stuff because he can
make money by selling them, paying
off the liens on them, paying you your
share of the
money (your exemption) and, if he still can
make more
money after all of that, it is his to use pay to your creditors.
So, have they actually got any proof that this is a truthful accusation and not just some
money - savvy girl attempting to
make a load of cash
off someone that presumably has his fair
share of it?
Speaking of Chinese track records: Gwynt - y - Mor — North Wales
off - shore — some geniuses @ Fluor (a risk
sharing partner in the project) decided Chinese monoplies were the way forward — didn't do proper QA in China and 100 + monoplies had to be sent back — lawyers are still
making money on that one.
But if we can also find ways for ordinary folks to
make and save
money by
sharing, bypass the dinosaur economy in the process, and reduce the amount of «stuff» each of us needs, then
sharing will take
off like wildfire, the real economy can thrive, and our beleaguered natural systems may catch a break too.
As shown by regulatory findings and Winston Cheng, LeEco's head of corporate finance, Jia's strategy rested on a «risky financial model» of borrowing
off of
shares from the one corporate entity he controls that is actually
making any
money.
To this mind - set, Facebook's privacy policies, for example, are a set of trade -
offs between
making money and providing a place where people are willing to
share the sensitive personal information that has
made Facebook the most powerful data owner on the internet.
YouTubers can also
make money off of ad revenue, and can
share links to their own personal fundraising sites, but it doesn't seem as immediate and cohesive as Twitch's subscription model.
Not unless I start getting a
share of the
money they
make off of it.