Damn the investors for
making money on such lunacy, damn the paranoiacs who think the added fluoride in our public water systems is a mind - control drug, damn the Times for running a massive photo of a startup founder who thinks water «expires» and is described as «sitting naked and cross-legged on a hot spring, his long brown hair flowing over his chest.»
Basically the odds of
making money on such a heavy investment approaches NIL — therefore no one will invest the money required to make a competing third set of lines.
Not exact matches
In every case a huge amount of fixed costs up front is overwhelmed by the ongoing ability to
make money at scale; to put it another way, tech companies combine fixed costs with marginal revenue opportunities,
such that they
make more
money on additional customers without any corresponding rise in costs.
So while there are certainly arguments to be
made in favor of a rules - based Fed over the pure discretion of the current PhD standard,
such reform should not be viewed as a solution to the real issue, which is a central bank having a monopoly
on money at all.
Try recording each and every purchase you
make for a couple of months by keeping a spreadsheet
on your computer or using an app
such as Mint, Personal Capital or Level
Money.
It seems unusual to encourage buyers to turn away from trends, because it's
such an easy way to continue
making money, but Cuyana isn't afraid of you embracing a lean closet; simply because they know that, if you come to them at some point, many of those pieces you love to rely
on are bound to be Cuyana -
made.
The startup's founder, Miles Penn, has been
making the rounds
on numerous television programs
such as Jim Cramer's Mad
Money in order to drum up interest.
Many people spend unnecessary
money on assistance they don't need,
such as career coaches, because they feel the approval of someone else will
make them feel like they're heading in the right direction.
When the company launched Discover, the special content hub within its app in January and its biggest bet
on making money, it included content channels from a few partner publishers, as well as one for its own material,
such as short series, and music videos.
A standard lease states the landlord is required to release the
money within 30 to 60 days after you vacate the property if you've met all of your obligations,
such as
making all rent payments, moving out of the apartment
on time, returning the property in good condition, etc..
If Apple
makes so much more
money for its shareholders than Amazon, why do Amazon's shares command
such a premium
on Wall Street?
Google has long impressed observers for its continued support of dozens of useful little web services that
make no
money, but Techcrunch wonders if more cuts are
on the way,
such as Google's Wikipedia competitor Knol and phone add -
on Grand Central.
We put
such a high value
on the right to democratic participation that we forbid voters from
making tradeoffs of this kind, from weighing how much they value their ability to vote against how much they value some quantity of
money.
Such retailers
make very small margins
on the hardware and virtually all of their
money on the games themselves — giving up consoles will hurt them a lot less than the manufacturers.
If you're
making a game, it's easy to want to generate
money based
on masses of in - app purchases,
such as Pokémon Go's coins.
Millennials should look into personal financial management apps
such as Digit and Acorns among others, that provide users with real time insight into their spending habits and
make it easier to allocate
money to their retirement savings with a few taps
on their phones.
Stop searching for shortcuts and secrets; focus instead
on the simple things your parents and grandparents taught you,
such as not to spend more
money than you
make.
On the other hand, if you'll need the
money in just a few years — or if the prospect of losing
money makes you too nervous — consider a higher allocation to generally less volatile investments
such as bonds and short - term investments.
He also told us they expect to
make money on other services not related to investing,
such as Angel List talent which according to Ravikant, «has growing 2 - 3x in the past month with 1600 mutual matches of about 600 candidates, with 3300 companies recruiting and a reported 5 % close rate.
Trump also denied knowing where the
money to pay Daniels came from and ignored another question
on whether he had ever set up a fund that Cohen could use to
make such a payment.
He did sort of mend the bridges and
made it work in the end, but that really shocked me: to treat someone you love the most in
such a neglectful way because you were too focused
on bean counting even though you already had all the
money you would ever need (and that is in his 20s — he was a multi-millionaire).
We know that our success is based
on your success and as
such, we prioritize the
money -
making capabilities of all our affiliates.
Volatility
on Wall Street has been historically low for months, and for investors, the products became a decent way to
make money in
such a setting: Each gained about 180 percent in 2017.
So, forget about getting rich quick by some «magic bullet» trading system you stumbled across
on your Google search for automatic forex trading robots; I promise you that trading takes time and energy and you have to actually learn how to read the charts, there is no
such thing as just downloading some software and pressing buttons to
make tons of
money.
It includes the obvious,
such as what you earned
on that
money you put aside in a bank or
money market account, as well as
on a few not - so - obvious sources: bonds, loans you
made to others and even that piddling little amount your home lease security deposit brought in.
Magnum Options also offers the «Buy Me Out» feature, which allows a trader to close their position prior to the official expiry time, where the system
makes an automatic payout calculation based
on historical data to determine the likelihood of the option expiring in or out of the
money had it not been closed early; Redwood Options offers no
such feature.
Factors
such as the Fed choosing to pay interest
on bank reserve deposits, the large cash holdings of big firms, and the persistent regime uncertainty that
makes lending / investing seem particularly risky these days can together explain the reluctance of the banks to turn the monetary base into
money via the multiplier process.
People who conduct illicit business
on the Dark Web,
such as selling stolen information or malware, are
making some serious
money, but they are facing obstacles in converting that digital wealth into actual fiat currency.
Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or
make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In
such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze
money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said
on daily basis to guard you from
such things and specially if passing haunted places
such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have
made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time
such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
It just
makes me wonder if all that
money wouldn't be better spent in supporting missionaries and evangelists
such as yourself who are already in Africa... What are your thoughts
on this?
I might be ecelectic, but what
makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less
money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you
on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in
such a bipolar reality...?)
1) Charities spend their income
on necessities,
such as food and utilities, which ever - so - slightly re-orients our economy toward recession - resistant products, rather than luxuries 2) Charities spend their
money quickly, but
on independent schedules,
making for a smoother stimulus effect
on the economy 3) Charities
make purchases tax - free, meaning that $ 1 spent by a charity generates a full $ 1 of private economic activity; furthermore, much of those tax revenues are recovered as income tax
on the grocery stores, utility companies, etc. that might not have received that income otherwise 4) Charitable giving is by far the most democratic way to improve society; from birth control to bombers, government assuredly spends
money on something you don't like, and charitable giving restores your say - so 5) Charitable donations are tax deductible, meaning you keep those tax dollars in your local community 6) Charitable donations provide the funds necessary for volunteers to serve the needy, thus giving «the average citizen» a chance to meet and interact with the needy, breaking down stereotypes
Yet McCain - Feingold had the unintended effect of
making 501 (c)(4) political activities far more important than they had been, since the law's ban
on soft
money doesn't apply to
such groups...
Then the text moved
on to a formidable list of reformanda: inadequate procedures for selection and training of priests, pastoral responsibilities allotted to those living elsewhere (Campeggio as Bishop of Salisbury would be an example — but Rome was full of
such men who used a part of their salary to pay a vicar to look after their diocese while they did other more congenial work in Rome); the bequeathing of benefices in wills especially to the children of priests, pluralism, failure to correct those who
make money by hearing confessions.
I had
such an ordeal
making Blueberry Mango Cobbler and spent so much
money on blueberries.
Although Rajbhog Foods still focuses
on producing traditional Indian sweets
such as burfi and katli, along with its eggless ice cream, the recession has
made it harder for consumers to justify spending
money on luxuries
such as those.
They would have bet good
money on the fact that I would never
make any
such statements about squash of any kind.
They would have bet good
money on the fact that I would never
make any
such statements...
With transfer fees continually
on the rise and this summer seeing some crazy prices paid for players,
such as the signing of rumoured Arsenal transfer target Gonzalo Higuain by Italian champions Juventus and the crazy
money set to be shelled out by Manchester United for their former youth star Paul Pogba, is this why Arsenal have
made just one big transfer so far?
we are spending OUR hard earned
money not OIL
money.we are spending
money on players we need unlike them buying players
such as Lukaku, van ginkel, De bryne and loaning them out when clearly they did nt even need them in the first place so selling them would obviously
make money back if you are looking at net spent.
The Dutchman took over at United in the summer, and has
made a great number of changes to the first - team squad at Old Trafford, offloading some under - performers and spending big
money on some exciting high - profile names
such as Angel Di Maria and Radamel Falcao.
Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more
on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome
such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and
money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack
on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always
make more
money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've
made along the way and simply reply... f *** off
All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only
makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready -
made excuse not to spend more
money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere
on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become
such a nightmare
Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls
makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as
such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever
made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big
money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus
on the head instead of the heart for now
You can
make money on a daily basis by betting
on baseball teams with a +150 payout... why would you tie up
money for an entire season for a player to win an award for
such a measly payout?
However, the
money spent
on guys
such as Char - reece Wright, Doug Martin, Breno Giacomini and Reggie Nelson (even if they are
making vet min) could be used to sign a more proven player.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs
on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved
on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders
on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as
such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed
on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building
on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help
make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence
on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find
money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time
on the training table as
on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to
making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought
on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really
make sense that we could only
make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger
on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just
such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
never waste CAPITAL LETTERS
on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why
such a frugal club spent so much
money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact
on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as
such he should prove himself
on loan for another season,
making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus
on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise
It's not just the
money Redknapp was allowed to spend
on players that
made his tenure
such an underwhelming waste of resources.
They also have Karim Benzema, who is only a few months younger than him, so spending
such eye - watering sums of
money on a player of a similar age and who won't be a long term option, wouldn't
make sense.