Not exact matches
But the
narrative already has the
makings of a feel - good Hollywood movie — so it should come as no surprise that a feature film dramatizing Ma's rags - to - riches rise is already in the
works.
We are
working in partnership with others to start a New
Narrative — a conversation with Canadians about our sector — who we are, what we do and how we are
making a difference.
But the human mind is
made to fall for stories and miscalculate the odds when a good
narrative is in place, as has been usefully described by the
work of Nassim Taleb and Daniel Kahneman, among others.
I think it is incredibly unfair for you to
make out that anyone who is struggling to
work out what they believe, and finding it difficult to «trust the Biblical
narrative,» as you put it, is only «claim [ing] to be Christian.»
But if the
narrative serves to
make neither a religion of
work nor a
work of religion, what is its effect?
That is, the statement that Jesus
made was specific to that particular group of Pharisees who were particularly stubborn to the way the Spirit was
working through Jesus in that particular
narrative.
Sometimes the most secular of scholars found that what Frei was doing, with his attention to
narrative and his interest in the language that shapes a particular community,
made more sense to them than the
work of many theologians much more systematically concerned to address other academic disciplines.
This tripartite organization
makes the overall
narrative disjointed, with Beecher fading to the background as ever more characters crowd onstage and the
work becomes a survey of 19th - century history.
Ultimately this elliptical, even eccentric involvement of biblical themes, figures, and
narratives does not
make for a
work of superior accomplishment in either religious or literary terms, whether by comparison to masterworks of the past or the finer novels in Coetzee's own oeuvre.
You have an overall premise that you have
worked hard and studied to
make sense of an fit that
narrative.
Destructive biblical criticism, exemplified for years in the
work of the so - called Jesus Seminar, eviscerates the gospel
narratives of all theological power and leaves us, at best, with a Jesus
made in our own image — political agitator, cynic sage, new age guru, etc..
But by assigning the complaint to the new paradigm — by blaming the new style of play for his problem instead of
making a direct appeal to get more free throws himself — he shapes the
narrative in a certain way that may
make it more likely for the league or individual officials to
work him more fairly (in his eyes).
I know it's illogical, but when you think of the times WWE has turned real events or perceptions into a
work, one thing that
makes Roman different is they went against the
narrative instead of with it.
I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone
make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have
worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club
made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional
narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes
made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to
make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision
The societal
narrative is that something must be wrong with you if you can't
make your marriage
work — you're not committed enough, you're not willing to do the hard
work, you're deeply flawed or incredibly selfish, etc. — instead of acknowledging that, hey, sometimes people
make mistakes.
«There is the lopping off
narrative of George Osborne and then there is the
narrative of
making people less reliant on the welfare state by
making work pay.
His complete immersion in his subject
makes for a superlative
work of
narrative nonfiction.
Though always intriguing and
making use of stunning visuals and an evocative atmosphere, this esoteric Western of religious references is still an unripe Jodorowsky, clearly lacking in
narrative structure before he started developing better his ideas in later
works.
While Rockstar San Diego may find some difficulty in filling its open expanses with interesting and emergent play, it does imbue it with a stark beauty and compelling
narrative that
makes Redemption more than just an allusion to cinema, but a piece of
work that can confidently stand next to it.
The
works of Max Brooks, who wrote 2003's satirical and subversively political, «The Zombie Survival Guide», and 2006's, «World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War», provided the kernels of inspiration for this mega-budgeted horror - action - thriller that mostly
makes up its own
narrative, independent of much of the book content (jettisoning the first - person account style and most of the events), to
make it fit more with the ranks of current, eye - candy loaded popcorn movies than a thoughtful adaptation of the best - seller.
While Unsolved isn't quite as slick and incisive as that FX series [American Crime Story: The People v. O.J. Simpson], it is an absorbing, provocative, and extraordinarily well - acted
work of television that takes a
narrative approach just novel enough to
make you feel like you're seeing these long - cold cases through fresh eyes.
There's little doubt, ultimately, that the character
works best in extremely small doses and yet much of the
narrative is focused entirely on his somewhat obnoxious (and completely unsympathetic) exploits, which ensures that large swaths of The Disaster Artist completely fail to completely capture and sustain one's interest - although it's hard to deny the effectiveness of certain
making - a-picture sequences in the film's midsection (eg the shooting of the infamous «oh, hi Mark» scene).
Whatever
narrative - drawbacks that may entail as a result of this, it is what
makes the movie
work.
It all feels like everyone was
working overtime to
make up for the lacklustre
narrative.
A Madea Halloween has all the earmarks of a play and it shows quite often through out its structure, which sadly goes against the three - act
narrative that
makes movies
work when done well.
Williams, a regular Reichardt collaborator, gets the least satisfying of the three
narratives, but the final 45 minutes, which also features spectacular
work from Stewart, more than
makes up for it.
The conflict serves as a manipulative backdrop for the couple's relationship, and though the script tries desperately to
make the metaphor
work, it feels shoehorned and iffy at best, resulting in a jumbled
narrative.
It's those
narrative conveniences that
make «In Darkness» feel slick and
worked over - the sense that an immensely powerful story of survival has been cut to fit the cloth of a by now well - established genre.
There are some liberties taken with the stories, partly because it's distilling four Gospels into one
narrative but also partly because dramatic license needs to be taken to
make a miniseries
work.
While there are standout examples — like Darren Aronofsky's disorienting, eye - opening Requiem for a Dream, or the achingly beautiful
narratives of animated animal - people addicts in BoJack Horseman — sagas like this one usually
work better on the page than on the screen; the brief gloss of film can
make drug use seem rather too appealing, while the idea of spending eight TV seasons with an addict seems rather unappealing.
The difficulty lies in balance: How do you create a sequel that honors the original
work yet
makes a visual and
narrative case for itself?
It sets up an intriguing
narrative in which Coughlin attempts to
make his own rules as he
works his way up, dealing with the various pressures life throws his way.
It's odd to see a minor character slowly overpower the
narrative of Neruda, but Larrain and Bernal
make it
work.
As an astounding Shakespearean director and actor, he is also proven to
make bigger budget films
work for him and tell interesting
narratives for characters we didn't think we'd care about i.e. Thor and his live - action remake of Cinderella for Disney.
I think it's healthy to
make work that disrupts and questions that, and shows alternative
narratives.
Despite being, in a sense, the most straightforward, linear
narrative movie the writer and director Paul Thomas Anderson has
made in quite some time (perhaps since «Punch Drunk Love» — and this is not the only respect in which the two films resemble each other), «Phantom Thread» could be the filmmaker's most fascinatingly oblique
work.
But though it could be viewed as a series of short, fun, film pitches - Channing Tatum's happy sailor tap - dancing routine was a favourite - wrapped up in the larger
narrative of a movie star being kidnapped, its so beautifully put together, well - performed, tightly - scripted and deliberating
making fun of itself that it
works.
Not all of it
works: Recurring ghostly appearances by the dead Orlando are a hoary
narrative device, and Aretha Franklin's «(You
Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman» is a slightly jarring soundtrack choice.
The bleak and confusing
narrative vaguely touches on issues of grief for emotional impact, but it's the silly playfulness of the film and Cusack's dedication to it that
make 1408
work on its own limited terms.
Yet the turn
works, largely because it has the kind of organic weirdness that's not unlike little kids playing
make believe in the backyard shifting their
narratives at a moment's notice.
Although its overwhelming logic is hence from video games — «I've never
made it this far,» Cage tells his followers at one point, when asked what comes next — Edge of Tomorrow
works best as a gleeful riff on the
narrative tricks endemic to the cinema, an art defined more by editing than by images.
Given Stoltz's experience grasping the genre back in the 80s, he adapts such a beloved
narrative and
makes this film an all too familiar teenaged tale of love and friendship, but for this generation — so minus the tomboy drummer and
working class mechanic with the foggy lens of 80s rom - coms.
There isn't much to the performance below the surface, and while that does
work for the purposes of this
narrative, that doesn't
make it very compelling.
I plan on
making narrative films and I'm
working on the
narrative adaptation of this film.
And although Mendoza has admittedly peppered the
narrative with creepy images (eg a woman covered in boils
makes a brief appearance), Sapi does, in the end, suffer from a paucity of compelling (or even competent) elements that ultimately cements its place as an aggressively worthless piece of
work.
Granik, who
made her debut in 2004 with the addiction saga Down to the Bone (the titles of her first two features give the amusing impression that she has taken the term «body of
work» very literally), skillfully sustains the atmosphere, climaxing with a viscerally eerie light - of - the - moon boat scene that more resembles the
work of the French festival - circuit lightning rod Philippe Grandrieux than a thuddingly well - intentioned American life - on - the - margins
narrative like Frozen River.
The director Lee Daniels, whose film Precious I admired for its courage and grit,
works well with his lead actors but
makes some fatal
narrative and casting choices.
But in place of actual drama, the screenplay by Janet Scott Batchler & Lee Batchler (Batman Forever) and Michael Robert Johnson (Sherlock Holmes) actively
works to
make you remember other dramas you've seen, in the hope that
narrative shorthand will be enough.
Not content with reaching a dazzling apotheosis in the on - screen presentation of song and dance, Fosse wove singing and dancing into a semi-autobiographical
narrative chronicling the final days in the life of Joe Gideon, a genius director - choreographer whose non-stop
work regimen is
making him physically ill.
British film director Steve McQueen's 2008 debut film, Hunger, is notable for many reasons: It is a great film, a great debut film, uses an innovative
narrative structure, uses interesting cinematography in concert with its soundtrack,
makes the best use of ambient sound to have the best non-musical soundtrack I've heard in a long time (if not ever), is the
work of a black artist that is not obsessed with black only topics, and shows a maturity and grace that goes beyond even the first films of directors like David Gordon Green, in George Washington, and Terrence Malick, in Badlands.