It played a small part in the Scottish referendum last time but the SNP were able to shut the issue down to a point by
making the obvious argument that Britain was able to keep the pound in the EU, so Scotland should be able to too.
Not exact matches
The first and most
obvious is that what he has to say captures so well the essence of the revisionist
argument, and second it
makes clear that the
argument of the revisionists is the same whether they are speaking of heterosexual or homosexual relations.
We must use these tools to
make obvious the overlooked connections between secular and religious
argument.
As Bauer
made his
argument, it was
obvious that he was speaking directly to the reporters present.
A popular
argument against the existence of God is what some call divine hiddenness: «If God exists, why doesn't he
make his existence more
obvious, such that it could not be doubted?»
While the recent form of the Under - 21s side might be a strong
argument against that with a group of talented young players on show, the point he
makes about the Italian, Spanish and French leagues providing an
obvious spine of homegrown players in their respective All - Star teams is true.
I won't
make this
argument now, but somebody could argue that Quin's coaching was even better given those two
obvious limiting factors.
From drawing our attention to the ignored but
obvious, to
making attractive points and
arguments, to drawing sensationalist targets — he has reopened a debate on the foreign nature of the Premier League and its consequences for the national team's future achievements.
While the
obvious choices like Robin van Persie and Yaya Toure are clearly also qualified candidates for the PoY Award, Ramsey fans could
make a strong
argument that he deserves mention with even the world's very best, at least through the first six weeks.
Caring was simply pointing out what is
obvious, mainly that you are more interested in
making your case by kicking a woman who is already down than you are
making a reasoned
argument.
(I could also ask what
arguments can be
made against, but I consider that a rather
obvious question and can easily come up with several reasons myself)
(29) This is important, because most of the theoretical
arguments about why gluten is bad for you are based on the idea that it damages your gut and
makes it «leaky» — even without other
obvious symptoms like bloating, diarrhea, and abdominal pain.
Sorkin seems fascinated with why Molly excelled at this unusual occupation, and his
obvious appreciation for her and her accomplishments
make the film play too much like a straw - man
argument whenever anyone else is talking.
It seems
obvious that diversity would
make everyone smarter and white people less racist, but there's not enough research to
make a full - throated, empirically - driven
argument for integration.
In the early 1980s it was not yet
obvious how neoliberals would
make use of the economic crisis in impoverished communities — and the
argument that school failure was the leading cause of economic misery — to
make their case for a radical transformation and privatization of public education.
To me this is
obvious, but I've learned to include this sort of disclaimer to
make it marginally more difficult for dodgers, denialists, and dudgeon demons to avoid actual thought in favor of straw man
arguments and other mischaracterizations of what I've actually said.
Given all of these problems and the lack of any
obvious solution in the short run, how do you
make the
argument that index investing is still relevant?
That might be the dumbest
argument I've ever heard regarding this and its just sounds bias and desperate to avoid the very, very
obvious conclusion that this move is good and
makes them money.
I'm going to put aside the
obvious criticisms to throw at the numbers here (games are
made by multiple people of different countries, games take more than 12 months to
make, entry is elective, Terry is Irish) and focus on the core
argument..
I testified at the state legislature in Louisiana against one of the no - nothing bills you mentioned, and even though it was painfully
obvious that the legislators had no real intention of being affected by any
argument we might
make, it was a necessary «waste» of time.
That this is invalid reasoning should be
obvious by simply replacing 50 % with any other value and noting that the half / half
argument could be
made independent of any data.
Ray's answer
makes it
obvious (for me) that reality is very complex and far from being explainable by simple, hand -
made arguments for the general audience; that's why I think that trying to explain «simply» the very complex phenomena involved in radiation transfer is just lost time - and in my opinion the REAL issues associated with social impacts of GW are not primarily associated with the detailed physics of the phenomenon.
Further, he
makes the classic logical error of «begging the question» or assuming the proposition as part of the «proof» when he says Given that global warming is «unequivocal», and is «very likely» due to human activities to quote the 2007 IPCC report, in addition to the
obvious argument from authority.
When Slide 4 is taken to the logical conclusion Lindzen seemingly wants the honourable members to draw, namely that if greenhouse gases continue on their current rise we can expect a further rise of only 0.8 C over the next 150 years, he's simply using the same linear - trend
argument that Girma and Arfur Bryant love trotting out, obfuscated to
make it less
obvious.
When I spoke to him his frustration was
obvious as he said he had spent three hours talking to Professor Paul Nurse about the detail of the climategate emails, the failings of the inquiries and the many and varied sceptical
arguments with respect to man -
made climate change.
This series argues that NGOs, governments, and citizens should ask opponents of climate change policies questions designed to bring attention to the
obvious ethical and moral problems with
arguments made by opponents of climate change policies based on cost.
One
obvious place to look is to see if the person
making the
argument has the demeanor of a disinterested party, or is clearly on one side, and trying to buttress his position.
This series argues that NGOs, governments, and citizens should ask opponents of climate change policies questions designed to bring attention to the
obvious ethical and moral problems with
arguments made by opponents of climate change policies.
This article, the first of three in a series, proposes what NGOs, governments interested in stronger action on climate change, and citizens should do to expose the
obvious and deep moral problems with the most common
arguments made by opponents of climate change policies.
A related
argument is that it is * impossible * for summaries of cited sources to be plagiarized... also nonsense... but if so, then there's W. 11.4 Summaries issue tally and at the very least the 4 categorized «B» and «C» (in caps), and in Bold seem especially
obvious candidates for fabrication, as they all
make explicit change to the text to change meaning significantly.
Meanwhile, the logarithmic effect of CO2 is excellent «concession» to
make in the rhetorical sense, since it concedes the
obvious state of our knowledge about the effects of CO2, while at the same time providing us with the solid
argument that even if we double atmospheric CO2 levels from 400ppm to 800 ppm over the next 100 years the largest amount of warming possible — assuming all else remains the same and Gaia has no homeostasis negative feedback systems which tend to moderate any runaway trends — is 1.2 c.
But there's an
obvious argument that, having gone this far, it would
make sense to keep going after 2050 with the aim of restoring the pre-industrial level (278 ppm) by a combination of massive reforestation, improvements in land use and, if necessary, technological measures to remove CO2 from the atmosphere (there are some ideas about already and this would be the last cab off the rank, giving decades to turn them into workable options).
If it is not immediately
obvious the «recent research» analysis about the cold weather is trying to
make an
argument about weather patterns as an indicator of longer - term climate change.
The problem is a bias towards confirming what we already believe to be true can lead to an overly optimistic reading of the merits of a case and can
make us blind to flaws in an
argument that neutral outsiders find
obvious.
It's a bit
obvious to declare that this will be one of the top sellers of 2017, but has Samsung successfully
made the
argument for why consumers should spend this much money on mobile device?
However, even if the Contractor could
make the
argument about the empty pool, the court stated that the Brokerage would still be entitled to judgment because there was no duty to warn the Contractor about an open and
obvious danger like an empty pool.