Sentences with phrase «make rights claims»

Natural law is the bridge, so to speak, for Jews who want to leave the ghetto without becoming so assimilated that they abandon their religion: «What a natural law perspective does for Jews at this level is to enable them to make rights claims, but without having to adopt the type of all «embracing secularism that is antithetical to the covenantal basis of traditional Jewish life and thought.»

Not exact matches

«Because of our emphasis on the long - term, we may make decisions and weigh tradeoffs differently than some companies... We will continue to make investment decisions in light of long - term market leadership considerations rather than short - term profitability considerations or short - term Wall Street reactions... We aren't so bold as to claim that the above is the «right» investment philosophy, but it's ours, and we would be remiss if we weren't clear in the approach we have taken and will continue to take.»

He also relies heavily on claims made by human rights groups and the United Nations in supporting his case against the Assad regime — claims that some skeptics have said are made with zero verification.

Right now everybody's shunting blame and making claims.

«We're trying to get them some money right now, get their claim started, and basically make things as easy as possible for them and make sure they're in a safe place,» says Rosa Nelson, a spokesperson for Intact Insurance, Canada's largest property and casualty insurer.

On a personal website, she claimed YouTube was trying to suppress her videos (about issues such as veganism, animal rights and exercise routines) and removing her ability to make revenues from her content.

«I'm not making any great claims, but we want to be right in there,» Dyson says.

The right thing to do when confronted with a mistake is to own up to it, not to make a series of bizarre claims in defense then insult the profession of the people who correctly pointed out the error.

You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless NBCUniversal, its affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, as well as any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees and costs) arising out of or accruing from (a) any breach of these terms, including any of the foregoing provisions, representations or warranties, and / or from your placement or transmission of any content onto NBCUniversal's servers, and / or from any and all use of your account; (b) any material posted or otherwise provided by you (including without limitation User Content), or any other subscriber or user of your account that infringes any intellectual property right of any person or entity or defames any person or violates their rights of publicity or privacy; (c) any misrepresentation made by you in connection with your use of the online services; and (d) any breach of any of the representation, warranties or other terms or conditions relating to use of your User Content or the online services.

While companies are getting fined left and right for making unsubstantiated claims and misleading customers with their marketing, there are still those that know the value of putting authentic stories front and center.

Although it claims it's not making a political statement, Budweiser sure did drop this commercial at the right time.

Assange has made a point of comparing his organization to traditional media outlets, saying in a recent opinion piece in the Post that his motive «is identical to that claimed by the New York Times and the Post — to publish newsworthy content,» and that WikiLeaks publishes material «irrespective of whether sources came by that truth legally or have the right to release it.»

On a recorded call, the head of Gap Inc's investor relations, Jack Calandra, pointed to a «tepid macro environment» for retail and store traffic problems that worsened in April even as he incredulously claimed that Gap is making «good progress» in righting itself.

Using the language of rights is a way of making the strongest possible kind of ethical claim, a way to draw a line in the topsoil, as it were.

It's important to get things right from jump street vis - à - vis customer service; a man (I make no claim to his wisdom, he may have had the wisdom a closed - head - injured orang) once said «if you don't have time to do it right, when will you find time to do it over?»

Macy's claims it has exclusive rights to make and sell Martha Stewart products.

While the claim that John Horgan and the NDP have made does appear to resonate with a substantial number of Canadians, in action, they're less inclined to think that the decision to delay the project was the right one.

To be sure, the SEC and its supporters claim that the proxy rules simply make effective rights shareholders have under state law, [6] but in fact shareholder control rights under the latter are extremely limited.

right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, and selling the invention claimed in

The institutional shareholders claimed investors have the right to receive all information «necessary to make informed decisions» for voting at the annual meeting next year.

It's not the first time Trump has made a wild claim, but in this case he's right, by one very important measure — the corporate statutory tax rate.

Such a claim typically comes without any voting rights, but voting rights can sometimes be triggered if the promised payments aren't made.

This means that you are investing in paper plus the right to make a delivery claim.

So is Safe Income Inc. really smart, proven, and right way to make a daily second income, as the video claims?

A third option would be to make a more aggressive push for independence claiming that Spain has just again violated their rights.

The Arabs are just making up stuff left and right to claim some «ancestry» in the Canaanites, Philistines, Phoenicians, etc..

In an earlier interview with the Press & Journal, Mr Movan claimed his constitutional right to practise freedom of religion had been «infringed upon» and that the police department had made «no accommodation» for his religious beliefs.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

It is an attempt to safeguard individual rights without making any grand claims about his place in the Cosmos.

using your argument we would had civil rights in this country just because goverments make certain practices illegal does tat mean that what the goverrmet s doing is moral and just, The fact s the goverment attempted to use Christaniaity to bolster it claim to power through this we have the start of the Roman Catholic Church one of the most insidious evil organzations on this planet which as doe more to oppose ad kill true follewers of Christ then ay group o this planet.

Spin it how you will, religion constantly gets a free pass in this country and when its ever called out for its discriminatory practices and beliefs it claims religion has the right to discriminate based on those beliefs... but everybody else doesn't have the right to even make the accusation that religion is getting all kinds of special rights allowing them to justify their own discrimination.

I'm sorry but you're not making an argument to counter his, you have no references or citations to back up such a claim and so you revert to attacking this man by calling him gay??? really, you think your the world authority on the bible when then you start casting stones left and right and attacking your fellow man?

so questioning their right to claim christain on your definition is in fact making that decision based on the fact that you think they are wrong.

To all others that make the claim that Mormons are not Christians, I must ask: What gives you the right to determine who is Christian and who is not?

Your right there was a time that we did not know about germs and the religious claimed it was demons and evil spirits that made people sick.

They refuse to make absolute claims like a fetus is not a human being / person, and people have an absolute right to terminate a pregnancy.

He said, «This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

My article made note of old claims about the divine right of kings, not because I imagine such claims were true even in their own time, but because they at least offered a theory about why the state is justified in exercising power over life and death.

God / The Prophet Samuel: «they have rejected me [God] as their king» «warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will claim as his rights» «He will take your sons and make them serve» «He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers» «He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants» «you yourselves will become his slaves.

When such a claim is made and when homosexual activity is consequently condoned, or when civil legislation is introduced to protect behaviour to which no one has any conceivable right, neither the Church nor society at large should be surprised when other distorted notions and practices gain ground, and irrational eruptions increase.»

If the strongest creatures survive in nature, then is it not natural for the state to claim that might makes right?

You may not like the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, you may not agree with their tenets, you may even feel you are such an expert on what makes someone a Christian and have the right to make the judgement on who is and who isn't, but spouting off inaccurate claims indicates no credibility, and inasmuch as Jesus said «thou shalt not bear false witness» I guess it doesn't leave you looking much like a Christian.

right now there is only one alive child that is making the claim, since the other committed suicide after «drug and alcohol» problems too.

It is entirely possible that, at a time when very important decisions have to be made and acted upon for the good of humankind and the planet as a whole, far too many people will focus their attention on their own immediate vicinity and insist on claiming their individual right to act within it as they wish.

They spent most of Monday doing their darndest to make everything worse, from defending manhandling a customer («We followed the right procedures») to blaming the passenger himself (claiming he was «disruptive») to coining a laughably bad neologism to describe their treatment of him («re-accommodated»).

The claims which Christian faith makes are an interpretation which it puts upon these happenings; and the historian has every right to investigate the records of these happenings and to pronounce upon the probability or otherwise that they did in fact occur.

Translated into program, what Washington wanted to see was blacks concentrating in the main on developing their capacities to exploit such opportunity as already lay at hand, relying on the expectation that as such self - development proceeded, blacks would be in a stronger position to make a successful claim for the full rights of citizenship.

The American Lutherans state that «a qualitative distinction must be made between [the fetus's] claims and the rights of a responsible person made in God's image who is living in relationships.»

I'm just trying to explain that people often abuse Christianity; claiming you are doing an unjust act for God does not make it right.