Sentences with phrase «make small investments on»

If you like to time the market but you prefer SIPs because of the ability to make small investments on a regular basis then the Alert SIP may be able to interest you.

Not exact matches

CNOOC had made a small investment in the oilpatch before and it gave us a year to share the company's interest in investing in Canada with the very people who would adjudicate on the takeover.

Founded the same year as Andreessen Horowitz, Thrive's focus on media and internet investments has grown out of keeping a small amount of partners making ultra-focused investments.

Meanwhile Waugh is setting up a private investment company with a focus on making direct investments in small and medium - sized companies.

Speaking at the Post.Seed Conference on Tuesday, the PayPal co-founder and Founders Fund principal offered what amounted to a critique of the generally accepted model for funding startups, wherein seed and venture investors make lots of small investments in early - stage companies in the hopes that a few will yield big payoffs.

Sure some people make money on tax liens, but it's the small minority and not an investment suited for someone who doesn't first have tens of thousands of dollars invested.

Depending on the opportunity and asset class, Hedgewood is prepared to make relatively small investments as well as significant equity commitments in any one transaction.

Splitting up the brokerage commission on a five - share investment makes each investor's commission relatively small.

thanks, and yes, a pittance of a pension and regular checkups keep us on budget and head off any problems — best decision i ever made (financial or otherwise) was serving our country doing search - and - rescue, oil and chemical spill remediation, etc. (you can guess the branch of service)-- along the way, frugal living, along with dollar - cost averaging, asset allocation, and diversification allowed us to retire early — Vanguard has been very good over the years, despite the Dot Bomb, 2002, and the recession (where we actually came out better with a modest but bargain retirement home purchase)... it's not easy building additional «legs» on a retirement platform, but now that we're here, cash, real estate, investments and insurance products, along with a small pension all help to avoid any real dependence on social security (we won't even need it at full retirement age)-- however, like nearly everybody, we're headed for Medicare in several years, albeit with a nice supplemental and pharmacy benefits — but our main concern is staying fit, active, and healthy!

«Fortunately, I made a few small property investments, which I was able to get a decent return on, so there was enough cash in the kitty to explore my options.

In other words, over the next five years, this government is planning to spend more money on income splitting for a small number of well off families, a promise made during the 2011 election, than on supporting economic growth and job creation through new spending on research and infrastructure and lowering taxes on investment.

The New Energy Capital Cleantech Infrastructure Fund, a leading investor in clean infrastructure real assets, has made a follow - on investment in Cypress Creek Renewables, a leading developer and long - term owner of small to mid-size utility scale solar energy projects.

«-LSB-...] Our target batting average is» 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 «which means that we expect to lose our entire investment on 1/3 of our investments, we expect to get our money back (or maybe make a small return) on 1/3 of our investments, and we expect to generate the bulk of our returns on 1/3 of our investments.»

On November 21st, a relatively small biotech company named Gilead Sciences (GILD) made headline news in the pharmaceutical investment community when it acquired a little - known hepatitis C drug developer named Pharmasset Inc. (VRUS), for $ 10.8 billion, in an all - cash deal.

If you are on a low income and are starting your investment portfolio with very small capital, make sure you are not wasting even the little money you have on unnecessary fees and minimums.

As explained before you will also not receive the same return on investment as the trader you are copying because they get a small percentage of what you make on the trade.

The first two apply the talents, making a small return on their investment, much to the master's delight.

Armed with a small investment, the couple started making Mexican - style cheeses such as queso fresco, based on their cheese making knowledge from back home.

The Coalition has proposed changing the make - up of the Foreign Investment Review Board, which is due to make a recommendation to Mr Hockey on the sale, to include small business people and farmers on the board as well as lowering the threshold for proposed rural acquisitions to $ 15 million from $ 248 million.

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Despite our tough plans for cuts in public spending, we have stuck to the previous Government's commitments on capital investment, apart from some small savings made in May.

They have steadfastly resisted Gov. Andrew Cuomo's common - sense proposal for making a modest investment in prison education programs that have already proved highly successful on a small scale in New York's prisons.

Construction timeframes - about 36 months for each module - can make it easier for a smaller utility to raise capital and allow quicker returns on an investment while the rest of the plant is under construction, NEI said.

(i.e. investments pieces, items to save on, sources for budget - friendly finds, make the most of a small space etc.) Paint.

With regular review and considered targeting, you can make a good return on your investment, however big or small your budget.

In other words a huge investment of time and money which is justified only for a small percentage of presentations projects that come with a budget, leaving the rest of the presentations unpublished or just uploaded on slideshare.net (or some other PowerPoint archive) even when the presentation itself doesn't make much sense without the author's comments.

You get to make each student feel special — not a small return on your investment of a few moments of time.

And I think, in the brave new digital world, an author — great or small — should be able to make a return - on - investment calculation and decide whether they manage the publishing process or assign it to someone else.

(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.

For example, if you have an automatic RRSP contribution going into your investment account each month, index funds make it easy to invest in small amounts on a no - load basis.

In the 50's and 60's, Buffett made many more investments, and made much smaller profits on average (in other words, he bought stocks, sold them when they appreciated to buy still more undervalued stocks).

Thanks for prompt response Vipin My goal is to distribute my Debt portfolio from Bank FDs Debt funds are as good as FD but with TAX benefit I beleive because of the small equity component (0 % to 30 %) in Aggresive MIPs they can offer a good return in debt portfolio with low risk which makes it better than Balanced Equity Funds and Debt Funds on eiher side of investments Hence I believe along with Bank FDs, Debt Mutual Funds a person should also diverisfy and invest in Agrresive MIPs as one of the debt instruments

The small amount you spend on this software will be one of the greatest financial investments you can make for your future and your family.

I believe because of the small equity component (0 % to 30 %) in Aggresive MIPs they can offer a good return in debt portfolio with low risk which makes it better than Balanced Equity Funds and Debt Funds on either side of investments.

But he'd sustained a loss on an investment he'd made in a small business.

'' specifically on his famous «guarantee» that he could make 50 % per year investing small sums — a result that he in fact achieved for a number of years by using an investment strategy that I think is mostly misunderstood by most investors.»

I have a few more comments on a similar topic that I'll post next week on Buffett, and specifically on his famous «guarantee» that he could make 50 % per year investing small sums — a result that he in fact achieved for a number of years by using an investment strategy that I think is mostly misunderstood by most investors.

Aggressive investors looking at high - risk stocks to invest in should only allocate a small part of their portfolios to those investments There are always investment - related worries to occupy the minds of investors — but focusing on high - risk stocks to invest in just makes it worse.

They may not be as high - stakes as the investment industry's heavyweights, but they make money just the same, and they make you feel good to boot, whether by investing in small firms, channeling profit to micro-credit operations in developing countries, or simply by posting better - than - average returns on cash.

This all comes about because a small group of my family is setting up a Investment Club and before I read this article I was trying to think of ways the club could make money to invest and tying that into the part time work I do on the weekends.

In my opinion, if the borrowed funds will drive increased returns on investments («ROI») or add value to the business, a small business loan could make a lot of sense — if not, I wouldn't suggest borrowing.

I am having SIP in HDFC balance, franklin smaller, DSP BR micro, HDFC mid cap, Axis ELSS, ICICI pru value discovery and I would like to have some additional lumpsum investment, I am waiting from last 1.5 month but market keep on going up and up, making me more nervous with my lumpsum investment

On the other hand, if you diversify your lending by making small loans to multiple borrowers with acceptable risk levels, you can get a really nice return on your investment, but it will definitely require research and diligencOn the other hand, if you diversify your lending by making small loans to multiple borrowers with acceptable risk levels, you can get a really nice return on your investment, but it will definitely require research and diligencon your investment, but it will definitely require research and diligence.

Over the 21 15 - year periods into which we can divide this data, international small - cap value stocks compounded, on average, at 12.3 %, making an initial $ 100 investment grow to $ 572.

[1] The discovery of the «small cap risk premium» — over a 40 - year period to 1975 small cap stocks outperformed large cap stocks on a risk - adjusted returns basis — officially made size an investment factor.

DiamondCorp (DCP: LN) is still a fairly early stage investment, and they've made what appear to be some other small but smart purchases... but based on the very successful divestment of TriTech (at an IRR of 35 % +) and hands - on guidance from HBG, I'm prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

A similar $ 10,000 investment in 1930 made in small cap value stocks, on the other hand, would see your family enjoying a $ 707 Million portfolio in 2013

The sooner you pay off this type of debt, the less you'll spend on interest — and the more you'll have to put toward your small investments that make money.

The initial investment is typically small, and government regulations make it easy to keep tabs on how your money is being managed.