Sentences with phrase «make some distinctions from»

An expert panel convened by the Institute of Medicine clarified the cognitive aging process by making a distinction from Alzheimer disease and related dementias, and provided recommendations to enhance cognitive health in older adults.

They already have to report to the state using SACS and if their process made these distinctions from the outset, I do nt believe it would be that much more difficult or time - consuming.

For one, it has been widely condemned, and courts would likely avoid using Korematsu & Hirabayashi if possible, or attempt to make a distinction from them given a slightly different order.

Though, the hardware is quite similar, the smartphone has a metal frame and a glossy plastic finish with 8.9 mm thickness and 149 grams weight to make some distinctions from its predecessor.

If you can't make a distinction from the other candidates through a compelling cover letter, your resume for Secretary job might just stay inside the loads of others.

Not exact matches

Making this distinction is important because it will allow your workers to fully disconnect from their workspace and decompress.

The BOJ currently makes the distinction because buying long - term government bonds for monetary easing could bind its hands on policy for longer than it wants and make a future exit from ultra-loose easing difficult.

The title refers to the distinction Thiel draws between transformative, «vertical» change — going from zero to one — and incremental, «horizontal» change — going from one to n. «If you take one typewriter and build 100, you have made horizontal progress,» he explains in the book's first chapter.

The way market watchers make that distinction is to look at «cash purchases» — investors typically buy homes out of foreclosure with cash, while Joe Average usually buys his home with a mortgage from a bank or credit union.

While investors need information from various sources to make decisions, it is important to make a distinction between general market noise and relevant investment signals.

In his response, Austin made an interesting point: although there is certainly a distinction to be made between investments from private companies and SOEs, there is also one to be made between the different kinds of SOEs.

Again, the confusion arises from the failure to make qualitative distinctions regarding the degree of reflectiveness, the reliance upon principles, and the balance of internal and external influences upon behavior.

JUDGING THE JUDGES Patrick McKinley Brennan's review «The Forms Behind the Laws» (April) begs fundamental questions of interpretation, blurs the distinction between legislating and judging, and proposes a mode of judicial interpretation that would, in its practical application, be indistinguishable from judges who make decisions based on personal preference.

In fact, one of the more constructive criticisms I've heard from the complementarian camp is that, in the book, I did not make clear enough distinctions between how various complementarian organizations differ in their positions on biblical womanhood.

In 2012, when the Obama administration first proposed the so - called HHS mandate, requiring employers to provide insurance coverage that included free access to contraceptive and abortive drugs, it provided an exceedingly narrow religious exemption from the rule that echoed some of the distinctions first made in these earliest incarnations of the English tradition of toleration.

Probably the confusions resulting from this are such as to make the use of some other set of distinctions preferable.

So, while it may be problematic to make too much of the distinction between Scripture and Christ, I think that evangelicalism will benefit from a reminder that our faith centers around the living person of Jesus Christ — the World Made Flesh — not on the sacred texts that point to him.

Father Regamey makes the same distinction, but in more classic fashion: «The violence that is an unjust aggression, from outside, against persons, is bad violence, even though this injustice be called order.

This attempts to make the soul - spirit distinction piggy - back upon the «real» distinction of essence and existence; to maintain not only man's essential transcendence from the creator but the existential possibility of him becoming one with God.

These previous points once again are believed by many religions, but there are also many religions that don't make this clear distinction as with some forms of Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism and others which believe in the transmigration of the soul through reincarnation from humans to animals and vice versa.

As long as you understand the basic distinction I have briefly laid out above, and recognize that most teachers and writers are going to be a little confused on this topic, you can benefit from what they teach and write by making the little mental adjustment in your mind to whatever they are saying.

3 In the only passage from The Problem of Christianity where the doctrine of the Trinity is discussed at length, Royce does not make clear whether he affirms an ontological triunity of persons within the Godhead or simply a distinction of divine persons within the religious experience of the believer (PC 135 - 39).

I think the reason for this objection is that Cobb has not kept in mind the distinction I have made between inheritance from a dominant past occasion and oblique inheritance from occasions in the past which are contiguous but «at a slant,» so to speak (PPCT 328).

Indeed he went to great lengths, grappled with the formidable problem of the nature of light, made incredibly subtle distinctions between various types of change, all to explain the fact that in sight consciousness is consciousness of an object, pure and simple, apart from any feelings of bodily involvement.

On the face of it Santayana rejects all three of these departures from the tradition, since (1) he makes no very explicit move from a continuant to an event ontology, (2) regards the inherent nature of an object as a matter of the individual eternal essence which it actualizes and (3) regards the distinction between matter and form as at least a virtually inevitable way of expressing the obscure manner in which one state of things takes over from another (see RB 278 - 284).

His contention is that Whitehead's move from Trend I, the delineation of types of existence, to Trend II, in which Whitehead has assigned some order of «priority» among the types, is incoherent, that it involves the arbitrary introduction of some other principle not required by, and indeed inconsistent with, that upon which the distinction into types is made.

The distinction of the priest - minister from the preacher - minister is relatively easy to make.

Making a distinction involves drawing a boundary that separates something from everything else; it allows you to know what you are talking about.

Buddhist love differs from Christian love in that the Buddhist lover is not a self and, consequently, makes no distinction between lover and beloved, whereas Christian love is that of a self for other selves.

Their «criminally stupid strategy» of removing central economic distinctions from the table has made them easy prey for their enemies: «[B] y dropping the class language that once distinguished them sharply from Republicans they have left themselves vulnerable to cultural wedge issues like guns and abortion and the rest whose hallucinatory appeal would ordinarily be far overshadowed by material concerns.»

It is commonly pointed out that in Pauline thought there is no clear distinction made between the Holy Spirit and the spirit of the risen Christ.43 Even in the Johannine tradition, as we have seen, the Holy Spirit was received by the disciples from the risen Jesus on Easter day.

When efforts have been made to measure economic welfare in distinction from gross product, the results have generally showed greater divergence than economists generally like to suppose.

Humanity Made for Christ When speaking to modern audiences, especially young adults, about what distinguishes us from the animals, it is not always a good idea to start with negative distinctions - pointing out, for example, that animals can not do such and such, but we can.

He moves towards making a crucial distinction in stating that: «Humanity has acquired the capacity to refect, to imagine, and to reason from what is known to what is not yet known.

My experience is that much of the error here stems from a failure to make a fundamental distinction between businessmen — and especially pro-business regimes and arrangements, about which Adam Smith was energetically skeptical — and pro-market regimes, which admittedly are far more rare.

I make these general remarks about the two sorts of judgment, because there are many religious persons — some of you now present, possibly, are among them — who do not yet make a working use of the distinction, and who may therefore feel at first a little startled at the purely existential point of view from which in the following lectures the phenomena of religious experience must be considered.

The process of draining logic and meaning from everything came to full fruition in the 1960s and 1970s, when it began to be felt profoundly in the daily lives of many Americans, with such things as the proliferation of «alternative lifestyles,» the diluting or jettisoning of academic standards at every level, the increasing inability of the legal system to make in practice sufficient or consistent distinctions between victim and victimizer — among many others too familiar to all of us to need spelling out.

He makes pointed use of sociological distinctions, noticing that in modern societies religion usually «is separated off in a distinct sphere» from politics; as a result, such societies do not fight wars about religion as such.

Political leaders might benefit from reflecting on a distinction Max Weber made between the morality of saints and the morality of politicians.

In fact, during World War II, there was a useful distinction made in the slang of the RAF, which distinguished the «info,» a lot of boring rigmarole about useless facts, from the «gen,» the real stuff you needed to know to tell you how to operate.

From Strauss onwards, when the distinction was first being made between Jesus and Christ, attention switched from the Christ of dogma to the Jesus of histFrom Strauss onwards, when the distinction was first being made between Jesus and Christ, attention switched from the Christ of dogma to the Jesus of histfrom the Christ of dogma to the Jesus of history.

The reluctance of some people to separate themselves from their social system and this crisis at the Seminary influenced missionary goals by making missionaries more determined to remove caste distinctions as a prerequisite for becoming Christian.

I certainly think there is a distinction that can be made between «Christ against culture,» by which Niebuhr means Christ separated from aspects of culture, and «Christ against culture.»

According to Victor Lowe, for example, the distinction between two divine natures may have been made explicit only in Process and Reality but was nevertheless already present in Religion in the Making (1926): «The distinction of God's primordial nature from the «consequent» nature is introduced in Process and Reality, but the corresponding ideas can be discerned in Religion in the Making» (100).

Because much of the pioneering work in this type of research was done by members of the Frankfurt School of Social Research (notably H. Marcuse, M. Hochheimer, T. Adorno, W. Benjamin), known for so - called Critical Theory, the great variety of this research is distinguished from the administrative by calling it critical research, following the distinction made in 1941 by Paul Lazarsfeld, a pioneer of modern administrative research.

Christian ethics must make this distinction, else we not only shall lose the Ten Commandments from Christianity but will be obliged to ascribe to Paul a disregard of the moral law at variance with the moral concern which appears on every page of his letters.

From the pandemic of pornography to reality T.V., to the insatiable urge so many feel to make the whole of life a performance on Facebook and Twitter, the distinction upon which civilization has depended — a careful demarcation between the public and the private — is dissolving before our eyes.

Thus Whitehead, by making the two distinctions which he has made, has got himself into an extremely strong position from which to embark on a new philosophic enterprise of generalizing from the direct deliverance of sense - awareness.

We both accept, I think, these four related things about human knowing: (1) sentient experience of «physical things» is intrinsically infused with objective meaning, purposefulness and value; (2) flowing out, of this and intertwined with it is, at least for humans, «cognition» of the physical, and moral experience of such value; (3) this moral experience and engagement reveals the spiritual realm as something foundational to and «abstractly distinguishable» from the physical realm — values for Ward, mind for me; and (4) one piece of evidence for making such a distinction is the uniquely «publicly....

Black makes some essential distinctions: childless marriages being terminated by young couples are different from long - term marriages in which one spouse has been a homemaker, and both are different from divorces in which minor children are present.