Sentences with phrase «make the same claim for»

A Hindu scientist could make the same claim for the Hindu gods but you would not consider them evidence of their gods.

Clerical triumphalists and lay defeatists start from the same principle and make the same claim for the Church's ministry.

But if you make the same claims for a religion that's been followed (granted, often poorly) for a couple thousand years, then it's looked upon with skepticism.

When he makes the same claim for the country as a whole, we run him for president.

But could I not make the same claim for aliens landing?

In regards to Rippletoe's advice, one could make the same claim for anabolic steroids in injectable or pill form.

Even though they don't make the same claim for ebook deals advertised only on their newsletter, the small fee of 4.90 $ or 9.90 $ (for free and bargain deals, respectively), makes this a worthwhile site to try, considering the size of their newsletter.

Not exact matches

Kids now seek out Studio notebooks, made for Dollarama, the same way they once sought out Hilroy for back - to - school, Fadel claims.

To qualify for this guarantee: (i) you must have filed your original 2017 federal income tax return through Credit Karma Tax on or before April 16, 2018; (ii) you must be entitled to a federal tax refund from the IRS; (iii) you must have filed an amended federal income tax return using the same Tax Return Information through another online tax preparation service; (iv) your amended return must have been accepted by the IRS; (v) you must submit your complete Max Refund Guarantee claim to Credit Karma Tax no later than December 31, 2018; and (vi) the larger refund can not be attributed to claims you make on your tax return that are contrary to law.

It sure sounds like Microsoft has opened the door for game developers to make the same claims.

That claim, however, is premised on the idea that a buyer who uses PRIMARQ would have purchased the same home without PRIMARQ, and not have opted for a less expensive home, on which they could more easily afford to make a down payment.

Also remember that the IRS will not allow you to claim different tax breaks for the same expenses (known as «double - dipping»), so make sure you understand which mixture of tax benefits works for you.

Would you accept the same claim being made for another god, that someone had faith in their being real, and that god sent a sign proving his or her existence

I ask this for three reasons: 1) Warfield begins the chapter with Edward Gibbon's conversion to Catholicism, which was related to Gibbon's belief in the continuation of the miraculous; 2) he spends several pages in the same chapter critiquing another famous convert to Catholicism, John Henry Newman, noting what he sees as Newman's shift toward the miraculous; 3) even though he knows that Gregory of Nyssa, Athanasius, and Jerome all wrote about saints in which the miraculous was prominent, he still makes the claim that these «saints» lives» follow other Christian romances and thus represent an infusion of Heathenism into the church.

@ End Religion: philosophically speaking, you are making the exact same exclusionary claim for which you mock Christians.

Most Christians don't understand how others might see it as hate when they make the claim that their heaven & heII exists and that those not invited to heaven are going to go to heII to be tormented and tortured for eternity and the only way to salvation is to accept their God as your Lord and Savior... They think to themselves that they are just trying to help by condemning those they dislike and who don't worship the same way they do, but that doesn't change it from what it is, «hate filled».

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

As for the claim that if one simply waits long enough with an open heart, God will reveal Himself — that same argument is made by just about every religion.

How can anyone say they believe in God who created male and female above; and that God said that they should be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth — and claim that the same God has created them with a sexual orientation that makes it impossible for them to reproduce — ensuring no fruitfulness and multiplication which God commanded at point of creation?

The kind of science that makes the claim for evolution is NOT the same science that gives us the great quality of life that most of us have everyday (medicine, cars, electricity, airplanes, cell phones, etc).

If you actually want to make a claim that atheists are evil, then you'd have to look at the percentage of «evil» atheists (say, those who murder) vs. the same statistic for Christians.

You may see it as crazy talk, but you make the claim daily and I ask for evidence — if you had any, you'd present it, but each day it's the same dance.

He makes exactly the same movements as the other knight, infinitely renounces claim to the love which is the content of his life, he is reconciled in pain; but then occurs the prodigy, he makes still another movement more wonderful than all, for he says, «I believe nevertheless that I shall get her, in virtue, that is, of the absurd, in virtue of the fact that with God all things are possible.»

Without reducing all religions to a quest for one common essence — which the pluralist position is often accused of doing — and without making the simplistic claim that all religions are saying or doing «the same thing,» it nevertheless seems that in their own widely divergent ways they all seek and express union with something like what we have been calling «mystery.»

The same claim has been made for thousands of people throughout history.

Secular rationalism may be the right road, may be the Truth as it claims to be; but it has come to be felt that there is no a priori intellectual or universal reason for supposing so from the start, so that it may sit in unchallenged judgment on equally massive and venerated traditions, Christian, Hindu, or whatever, that make the same claim.

Special authority for the biblical view can not be claimed on the grounds of its potential utility in understanding life; other sources of potential utility can make the same claim.

However, in spring 2005, when Raymond Bradley, an atheist in Editorial Board for The Open Society journal, wrote an open letter to Flew accusing him of not «check [ing] the veracity of [Schroeder's] claims before swallowing them whole,» Flew strongly responded to that charge in a letter published in the same journal in summer 2006, describing the content of Bradley's letter «extraordinary offensive» and the accusation made by him as an «egregiously offensive charge»; he also implied that Bradley was a «secularist bigot,» and suggested that he should follow Socrates's advice (as scripted in Plato's Republic) of «follow [ing] the argument wherever it leads.»

For instance, companies that make health claims on their products, such as Blackmores, now need to go through the same lengthy and costly approval process to sell their dietary supplements through online and traditional retailers in China.

(2) A nutrition content claim using the descriptor diet is a comparative claim if it meets the conditions for making that claim by having at least 40 % less energy than the same quantity of reference food.

Claims can not be made on infant formula, but follow - on formulas or processed cereal - based foods and baby foods for older babies are not subject to the same legal restrictions.

Wilshere for all his injuries is far better than both Ramsey and Xhaka.I just don't know the importance of Xhaka in the team if he can't defend.He's the real problem in the squad.Why do fans keep accepting mediocrity?Aren't we tired?It's painful seeing him play every match in our midfield then the same people who claim to love him would come and be making noise about how average he is after a bad match forgetting that he's actually average.I'd easily play Maitland - Niles or Coquelin over Xhaka.They would provide more steel in the midfield.Is it going to take us four seasons to realize how average Xhaka is?The painful things is that by that time many trophies would've have by passed us.

Same people are claiming that Sanchez has made up his mind not to play for Arsenal again, when and where did he say so?

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

@Jimbeam that story was not credible.Ut was made up.Also your questions have are not even in line with what am saying.You are asling this and that and bla bla bla.It was needless.Everybody who is here wants Arsenal to achieve success regardless of whether we have average players or not because that's what we as fans do.The thing I was trying to say is that the same people who here who are nagging and crying are the same people who claimed to have lowered their expectations for the transfer window.So why all this talk.Listen I'll even want Arsenal to even have a world class eleven and when we don't win the cup with that world class eleven i wonder who'll be blamed after that.The critical thinkers here will tell you the main thing worrying this club is not even about the players.It's all summed up in one word known as philosophy.

I hope you realize that the other side has made the same claims and had the same hopes for previous presidents / politicians.

Arsenal made significant moves in the January transfer window, and reports claim it could be the same this summer with moves for Nabil Fekir and Jonny Evans.

Many high school programs claim the same mantra of «hard work and dedication,» but for a program to make a real difference, it must promote itself.

How adamant Rodgers was that Sterling wasn't for sale, claiming that he «wouldn't get the same opportunities» at other clubs really made Liverpool look like a very small fish in a big pond.

Critics claim that it is high because doctors make money from C - sections (false, most obstetricians get paid the same amount regardless of how the baby is delivered) or because it is more convenient for obstetricians (false, nothing is more convenient than every patient having an uncomplicated vaginal delivery).

Too often companies make misleading claims to be able to charge more for formula that is essentially the same as other brands (all formula has to comply with composition requirements).

However, neither ASDA nor Nestlé are apologetic for being caught out misleading parents and Baby Milk Action is today filing a case against internet advertisements from Nestlé for the same products that make similar claims.

This is greatly exacerbated in the US, which shows a weird mix of misunderstanding and political posturing... we've already got an answer claiming all socialism is communism (same people that use «liberal» as a curseword), which makes a pretty good example for this.

Class Action Litigation — Vote Passed (220 - 201, 1 Present, 7 Not Voting) The bill would prohibit federal courts from certifying proposed classes of individuals for a class - action lawsuit unless each member of the class has suffered the same type and degree of injury, and it would require quarterly reports by asbestos trusts of claims made against the trusts and any payouts made by the trusts for asbestos - related injuries.

Two of the entries were described as «loan repayment» and the other payment was for a «partial loan forgiven,» referring to a loan made on June 23, 2014 — the same day records claim he made the $ 100,000 loan to his campaign committee.

The TVC also makes assertions on its website about disproportionate homosexual pedophilia and attacks the idea that people are born gay and the claim that gays want the right to marry for the same reasons that heterosexuals do — the TVC suggests the real purpose of marriage equality is to destroy the concept of marriage and ultimately replace it altogether with group sex and polygamy.

Then in July 2007, he made another claim for the same item.

Malik was facing questions over why he was claiming money from the taxpayers» office costs allowance to fund an office in his constituency home in Dewsbury when he was making claims for his office costs elsewhere in his constituency at the same time.

«For eight years, I have balanced the budget and held the line on taxes while legislators have made the same claim,» he said in a statement.

For a society that claims to want everyone to be treated the same, we sure spend an awful lot of time looking for and making issue of anything no matter how small or stupFor a society that claims to want everyone to be treated the same, we sure spend an awful lot of time looking for and making issue of anything no matter how small or stupfor and making issue of anything no matter how small or stupid.