Sentences with phrase «make the same claim there»

Not exact matches

The claim that actions are «undetermined,» however, is not the same as the claim that there are no identifiable variables that influence the moral agent making those choices.

Of course there were others at the same time making similar claims, just as President Carter made them a decade later in the context of another debate over the justness of the United States» use of force against Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

It needs to be noted that two distinct claims have been made here: First, that God is a conscious and self - conscious being; and second, that there is an aspect of God that relates to us in our mode of existence as conscious personal beings, and that we can appropriately relate back to God only in this same way.

So, then you are making the argument that you are right because you are just challenging his view then can he or another of Faith just make the same argument that there is a God because you can not offer proof that there is not a God... basically that the Faithful are refuting your claim that there is not a God?

You are the one who went in about truth and morality are different terms, but since there is truth is an essential part of morality, why did you make the claim about them not being the same thing when I didn't claim that were the same thing but rather that the two are in fact connected?

Secular rationalism may be the right road, may be the Truth as it claims to be; but it has come to be felt that there is no a priori intellectual or universal reason for supposing so from the start, so that it may sit in unchallenged judgment on equally massive and venerated traditions, Christian, Hindu, or whatever, that make the same claim.

There are plenty of products on the market, and they all make the same claims; that they'll prevent and heal stretch marks.

Though there are many other fat loss dieting strategies that are perfectly viable, none of them can really come close to making that same claim.

Though there are certainly other viable fat loss strategies, none of them can come close to making that same claim.

There are a lot of dating sites out there that claim to be the number one in their niche, and Asianwomendate.com makes the same cThere are a lot of dating sites out there that claim to be the number one in their niche, and Asianwomendate.com makes the same cthere that claim to be the number one in their niche, and Asianwomendate.com makes the same claim.

But it can certainly lay claim to the same problem as that previous version: What shallow fun there is doesn't survive the final shootout; in this instance, it's just one more death knell for the crisply made action sequence.

Every occupation could make the same claim, yet just about every job out there gets objectively evaluated.

If I make the same contribution but claim it on my 2012 taxes, is there a different three - year window?

There are very few asset classes that can make this same claim.

Despite Bush's claims, which appear to pander to the same dirty energy his family made a fortune in, there is overwhelming scientific consensus that the climate is changing because of human activities.

... http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100922/full/467381a.html To make it clearer that Nature News wasn't misrepresenting them Andrew Revkin solicited their views in email at the same time and printed it on his blog: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/a-sharp-ocean-chill-and-20th-century-climate/ There were other comments at the time from researchers, e.g. Roger Pielke Sr. http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/comment-to-andy-revkin-on-the-dot-earth-post-a-sharp-ocean-chill-and-20th-century-climate/ So you are entitled to your views about aerosol cooling but you can't claim there is no controversy or on - going deThere were other comments at the time from researchers, e.g. Roger Pielke Sr. http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/comment-to-andy-revkin-on-the-dot-earth-post-a-sharp-ocean-chill-and-20th-century-climate/ So you are entitled to your views about aerosol cooling but you can't claim there is no controversy or on - going dethere is no controversy or on - going debate.

I am impresed by your claim, illustrated by images of Indians making ice using «cold» radiation (at the Earth's surface) while there is (simultaneously) a heating effect from this same radiation warming the surface (according to the IPCC) by 33C!

It is, however, a measure of their fundamental lack of seriousness that when there really are important uncertainties (i.e. the likelihood that climate sensitivity is higher than generally thought), they ignore them in favour of making the same repetitive uninteresting and incorrect claims they always make.

He (i) made an accusation, (ii) was challenged on it, (iii) referred to my blog as evidence, (iv) was proven wrong on that (v) claimed Crikey as evidence (vi) was proven wrong on that (vii) still didn't retract Now look at the video of Plimer on Lateline, doing exactly the same thing, and ask yourself why I think there is no point engaging in debate with these guys, except to mock them.

Every other firm out there is making the same claims, which makes them entirely ineffective.

Civil claims have been successfully made online for several years, and there is no reason that divorce cases can not be started in the same way.

There are few firms that can make the same claim.

The telcos, large ISPs and equipment vendors claiming there is no need for legislation while at the same time making broad statements about the value of the networks and the massive investment they have that is not being recognized fairly.

So given that there's the same or similar number of people claiming for an injury each year (albeit the number who are doing it online, indeed more and more from mobile devices, is still increasing), and given that competitors in the PI space online have continually increasing investment to meet competing higher media prices (eg Google Adwords is becoming more expensive for personal injury keywords — in the States some keywords eg «car crash attorney» ones are over $ 500 per click without any guarantee of making that a converted enquiry), and given more entrants into the market each year, pressures for many PI firms at the moment are understandably intense.

Greetings, i purchased the travel insurance for our 6day trip to the florida keys, flight down and trip itself was fantastic / / however on the return flight the plane us air flight 1807 was delayed by 2 hours at first then they delayed again another hour, total of 3 hour delay / / we had a connecting flight to catch in philia off course we missed that and the airline had no other flight out / / by the way we didn't land until 1; 30 am no train nothing available, so there we were, so i called my son a police officer and he took off work and drove 2 hours at 1; 30 am at night to come get us and bring us home, so i called allianz insurence and there words were you have to be delayed 6 hours or more to qualify well you all know that most flight that are delayed more than 2 hours you will miss your connector, especially at 1; 30 am in the wee hours of the morning / / so they read the fine print off the policy that was on page 10 say ing a delay of 6 hours to qualify / / ok so what about trip interruption clause / / he says falls under same clause / / ok what about trip cancellation clause / / in essence us air cancelled my connector??? agent says same thing / / so another words thats how they make there money by not helping a paid policy holder his due compensation fee for a legitimate claim!!

What other products out there can make this same claim?

Although taking two polices from the same insurance company is convenient in many ways as the claim process is less cumbersome and you will require lesser paperwork, but nonetheless, there may be different guidelines that will need you to make separate claims.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

If there are any claims which are yet to be processed in the same financial year, in which the claim is made then the pending ratio would be

If you have made any claims in the past for any accidents, the company will move safely and will charge more premium from you as there will be a higher risk of the same thing happening in the future.

While Vizio TVs don't employ the same motion - detection claimed to game efficiency testing standards, the report suggests there are other methods TVs employ that make them much less efficient than their Energy Star stickers indicate.

The feature was first rolled out through Facebook Messenger and there are speculations that claim WhatsApp will soon have the same feature making payments easier.

If you make improvements to a property and sell it for more, it's not the same property and there is not a leg for anyone to stand on to claim fraud.