Ignorant religious bigots
made the same claim about keeping interracial marriage illegal.
I think you're the fool, the media
made the same claims about Mourinho when he came back to Chelsea and even with previous PL experience he eventually got sacked after one season.
You could presumably
make the same claim about Quantitative Easing, but that is not a valid reason not to do it.
Would anyone
make the same claim about U.S. private schools today, or under JFK?
They do
make the same claims about the food containing high quality protein.
I'm curious... did
you make the same claim about the Wikileaks emails?
People have been
making the same claims about the Russian heat wave earlier this summer, yet the Russians insist that nothing like it has been seen for at least 1,000 years.
They have to realize that everyone else is going to be
making the same claims about themselves so very quickly, all résumés start to look the same.»
Not exact matches
Did it
make any sense to treat
claims about Clinton and Obama being literal, sulphur - smelling demons with the
same kind of objectivity as allegations
about email use?
Taking into consideration WeWork's Finance Chief's recent statements
about not
making a profit, seeing WeWork's desperate attempts at attracting new clients to fill up its spaces, and Neumann's
claimed sale of shares, the question is: Is WeWork headed in the
same direction as Ouvah?
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to
make a fool of themself the
same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you
claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
I ask this for three reasons: 1) Warfield begins the chapter with Edward Gibbon's conversion to Catholicism, which was related to Gibbon's belief in the continuation of the miraculous; 2) he spends several pages in the
same chapter critiquing another famous convert to Catholicism, John Henry Newman, noting what he sees as Newman's shift toward the miraculous; 3) even though he knows that Gregory of Nyssa, Athanasius, and Jerome all wrote
about saints in which the miraculous was prominent, he still
makes the
claim that these «saints» lives» follow other Christian romances and thus represent an infusion of Heathenism into the church.
So here you quote a single verse that
makes four
claims about me, three of which I know to be flat - out lies and the fourth condemning a practice that is lauded repeatedly elsewhere in the
same book (loving people).
Before you suggested I either believed in your god or don't so why should I
claim is an evil monster and therefore should not
make comments
about same, is that correct?
As for the
claim that if one simply waits long enough with an open heart, God will reveal Himself — that
same argument is
made by just
about every religion.
What
about all the other gods, all the other religions they
make the exact
same claim as you without any proof and history has shown over and over again those gods didn't exist either.
I
claim that Vosper, rather than blowing her own horn or trying to
make a buck off the church while she can — as some have accused — is actually working in the spirit of Bishop Pike to bring
about this
same honest re-examination of traditional beliefs, polity, and social awareness and action as someone who appreciates the tradition and all it holds dear, but only in a different way than the church would wish.
However, in a recently published paper, this
same author
makes some very different
claims about the age of geological features of the Australian landscape.
The
same claim could be
made about every piece of religious literature ever written.
You are the one who went in
about truth and morality are different terms, but since there is truth is an essential part of morality, why did you
make the
claim about them not being the
same thing when I didn't
claim that were the
same thing but rather that the two are in fact connected?
You can say that scripture does not
claim that, but then you appeal to scripture to say the
same about Christ, who is the Word
made flesh.
It
makes no
claims about evolution, abortion or
same sex marriage.
One way to approach this is to get people thinking
about religious
claims in the
same way they already know they should approach
claims made by used car salesmen, door - to - door solicitors, and politicians.
I believe it is clear you are
making a truth
claim about God, and in the
same breath saying you can not know anything
about God.
That's right, the word cookie evolved to be a thing just
about the
same time as the snickerdoodle was
making its
claim to fame.
And, you know, I was pretty nervous
about making such a grand
claim to begin with (even with everyone else's hearty endorsements of the
same recipe), so I feel pretty comfortable knocking this down to the precisely accurate title — «The Best Chocolate Chip Cookies I've Ever Baked.»
(3) A nutrition content
claim about choline, fluoride or folic acid may be
made only if a health
claim about that substance is
made in relation to the
same food.
Wilshere for all his injuries is far better than both Ramsey and Xhaka.I just don't know the importance of Xhaka in the team if he can't defend.He's the real problem in the squad.Why do fans keep accepting mediocrity?Aren't we tired?It's painful seeing him play every match in our midfield then the
same people who
claim to love him would come and be
making noise
about how average he is after a bad match forgetting that he's actually average.I'd easily play Maitland - Niles or Coquelin over Xhaka.They would provide more steel in the midfield.Is it going to take us four seasons to realize how average Xhaka is?The painful things is that by that time many trophies would've have by passed us.
Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even
making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to
make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and
make unrealistic
claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the
same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting
@Jimbeam that story was not credible.Ut was
made up.Also your questions have are not even in line with what am saying.You are asling this and that and bla bla bla.It was needless.Everybody who is here wants Arsenal to achieve success regardless of whether we have average players or not because that's what we as fans do.The thing I was trying to say is that the
same people who here who are nagging and crying are the
same people who
claimed to have lowered their expectations for the transfer window.So why all this talk.Listen I'll even want Arsenal to even have a world class eleven and when we don't win the cup with that world class eleven i wonder who'll be blamed after that.The critical thinkers here will tell you the main thing worrying this club is not even
about the players.It's all summed up in one word known as philosophy.
The fact that the Scot
made his
claim about the Gunners before we struggled to a draw in the north London derby certainly supports the theory he put forward that Arsenal are still suffering the
same problems that affected us last season.
That
claim is foolish as can be seen when the
same observation is
made about attachment parenting and autism.
The TVC also
makes assertions on its website
about disproportionate homosexual pedophilia and attacks the idea that people are born gay and the
claim that gays want the right to marry for the
same reasons that heterosexuals do — the TVC suggests the real purpose of marriage equality is to destroy the concept of marriage and ultimately replace it altogether with group sex and polygamy.
i hcve 2 leg days one is squats sets of 20 down to 12 my goal is 6 to 8 sets till failure then leg press 20 to 40 rep sets 6sets then ham curls 10 to 15 reps 6 sets my next leg day is leg press or the icariann plate loaded leg press i do 50 to 60 rep sets with different foot positions every 15 reps, then 1 leg presses rest pause sets of ten only 10 seconds rest at this point i quit counting just go go, this leg press session is a half - hour not much rest and no knee pain I'm not going heavy it compliments my heavy squat day my other parts are done in similar fashion, i don't consider this a heavy light split, its more of a kind of heavy 1 day then moderate high rep next session for those that need a label i really feel this is awesome I've lowered my testosterone dose to 300 mg every 10 days remember im44 not 24 lol i can
claim trt my point is i believe I've conditioned myself much more with michaels theories but to take my body to the next level i need to add more volume and excersise variance, i plan on competing within a year, thanks corey for your support i don know if we should post out training since its not according to michaels routine i would continue to hear
about your ideas, progress, your like me always searching as you get older safety and longevity are paramount, at the
same time we want to kickass and
make gains its addictive if you want i can leave my number corey take care and i wish everyone good luck and good health!!!!!!
I
make no promises or
claims about how this treatment might work for you in the
same situation.
Lewis wrote, He's either a lunatic for
making such outrageous
claims, yet every other thing
about his life was very sane.In addition, the Dead Sea Scrolls provide proof that the words we see in Scripture today are the
same words written in the Bible thousands of years ago.God spoke through His people to write the Bible and it's still changing lives every single day for those who meditate on it.
While New Orleans is a particularly culturally rich city, many of the
same claims could be
made about inner cities all across the country.
Those
same vendors often
make bold
claims about the quality of their customer support.
Every occupation could
make the
same claim, yet just
about every job out there gets objectively evaluated.
But Jaguar are
making no
claims about that — although it's almost certain to arrive as one of the variants when the new small Jaguar itself arrives, based on the
same underpinnings — so we really have to take the C - X17 as just a way of launching Jaguar's new platform.
I do not accept your arguments because they go on the contrary of what has been reported sometimes even on the headline of the article, and when asked for a source or proof you paraphrase the
same point, post a passive - agrressive comment, or talk
about your credentials as if somehow that alone invalidated the point being
made against your
claims.
an before you say sales do nt matter an
claim more sales do nt
make it better, the
same can be said
about the xbox one an PS4..
I thought a long time
about which RPG needed to be represented here, as I could essentially place any RPG onto this list and
make the
same claim, but Earthbound, beyond any other, needs to
make another appearance in the United States.
Many 3DS fans will cry foul at this and Nintendo will even
claim that the 3DS will remain as an important pillar post-Switch, but they said the
same thing
about the Game Boy Advance and I don't see many of them around today so
make of that what you will.
* I'm * confused as to why you think that when Angry Joe
makes claims about what gamers want, he's speaking for himself, but when you
make these
same claims, you're speaking for everyone.
The way Gober talked
about it, it was like he was wary of overemphasizing the place of the thesis —
making it seem too much as of a piece with Bess's work as a painter — while at the
same time he wanted to
make a
claim for the thesis as integral to the work.
We can't talk
about the need to organise global productive economy around the issue of climate change until we have discussed the
same order of
claims that were
made, in living memory,
about population, resources, and race.
Dear me Richard, you seem to be displaying the
same inability to misunderstand plain english as the deniers who
made false
claims about the CRU emails.
You are talking
about the wrong person, to put it mildly, but this is the assessment that need be
made, to continue perpetuating the
same self reinforcing belief on this issue, and memes to dismiss legitimate scientific concerns and
claims by leading scientists, as simple misplaced «alarmism» or other.
While I have read of accounts by skeptical scientists of how they are selectively funneled out of the funding process, the level of coordination it would take to virtually eliminate any funding for good research scientists who might reach findings that diverge with what we are calling «consensus» here seems far too complicated logistically to be doable — particularly when you consider those very
same scientists are frequently characterized by the the folks who
make such
claims about inequities in research funding as being so incompetent they are unable to see «obvious» flaws in their scientific reasoning.