In «Kicking The Tires And Looking Under The Hood Of Professional Licenses,» J. Craig Williams of May It Please The Court examines a bill in New York that would
make the unauthorized practice of law a felony on par with statutory rape, stalking, insurance fraud, identity theft and inciting a riot.
Not exact matches
[iv] Such editing should be
made the most damaging example
of the offence
of «the
unauthorized practice of law.»
What frequently
makes it worse is the failure to even pretend we care about scan: «E-discovery and artificial intelligence and
unauthorized practice of law rules, oh my!»
Of course, it is very important to make sure that your paralegal understands how to avoid unauthorized practice of law and what constitutes giving legal advic
Of course, it is very important to
make sure that your paralegal understands how to avoid
unauthorized practice of law and what constitutes giving legal advic
of law and what constitutes giving legal advice.
See Barlow F. Christensen, The
Unauthorized Practice of Law: Do Good Fences Really
Make Good Neighbors - Or Even Good Sense?
Since that time, for a variety
of reasons, including a Supreme Court decision that found certain ABA efforts to limit UPL to be anti-competitive, UPL prosecutions have declined.4 Still, every state but one has an
unauthorized practice of law statute that
makes it illegal for anyone who doesn't meet the requirements set by state bars or lawyer regulators to
practice law.
A silly action by the Cleveland Bar to bring charges
of unauthorized practice of law against a dad who successfully sued the school board on behalf
of his son to secure special education services is now
making all
of us lawyers look like fools.
The changes were based on the American Bar Association's modifications to the Comments
of Rule 1.1 respecting Competence (``... a lawyer should keep abreast
of changes in the
law and its
practice, including the benefits and risks associated with technology...») and Rule 1.6 respecting Confidentiality («(c) A lawyer shall
make reasonable efforts to prevent the unintended disclosure
of, or
unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation
of a client.»)
Rule 5.5
makes it clear that the key element in the
unauthorized practice of law is «personal advice» as opposed to «general advice,» where the latter is permitted and the former proscribed.
But as I explain here, it doesn't
make much sense to apply traditional
unauthorized -
practice -
of -
law analysis to what LegalZoom does.
These new entities probably will want to deliver non-legal services as well, so it
makes sense to start creating a regulatory framework for that (although it will be very interesting to see how lawyers choose to define «non-legal services,» and what impact that definition might have on subsequent attempts to enforce the «
unauthorized practice of law»).
Both solutions will occur because the power
of the news media and
of the internet, interacting, will quickly
make widely known these types
of information, the cumulative effect
of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations
of the thousands
of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help
of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages
of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers
of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that
law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the
unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need
of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among
law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that
law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision
of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion
of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members
of the public access the
law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule
of law, the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole
of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority
of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.
The Court's Committee on the
Unauthorized Practice of Law has proposed a series
of amendments that is largely consistent with requests
made by the D.C. legal services community.
It would seem that retraction
of the e-mail would have
made the «
unauthorized practice of law» a moot point.
730 DOS 02 DOS v. New World Realty
of New York, Inc. — availing
of license; deposits; disclosure
of agency relationships; duty to supervise sales associates; failure to pay judgment; proper business
practices; DOS has jurisdiction where disciplinary action was started while individual was licensed as an associate broker and was eligible to automatically renew at the time
of the disciplinary hearing; salesperson owned voting stock in licensed corporate real estate broker, failed to pay judgment and failed to present evidence
of inability to do so, and engaged in unlicensed activity after license expired; representative broker availed corporate real estate brokers license to salesperson; representative broker failed to properly supervise salesperson by permitting and authorizing salesperson to act as a real estate broker; broker and salesperson failed to
make agency disclosures and failed to deposit funds
of principal in a special bank account; real estate transaction conducted was a fraudulent business
practice; DOS fails to prove the
unauthorized practice of law; salesperson's license revoked and salesperson ordered to pay refund
of $ 1,406.00
of illegal commission collected; representative broker's license revoked and broker ordered to refund $ 74.00
of illegal commission collected; representative broker fined $ 5,000.00
122 DOS 99 Matter
of DOS v. Smith - failure to pay judgment;
unauthorized practice of law; salesperson breaches fiduciary duty to principal by inducing principal to
make two loans to other persons, guarantying payment
of said loans, failing to honor those guarantees and failing to satisfy a judgment entered against him;
unauthorized practice of law by drafting promissory note; $ 1,000.00 fine and suspension
of license until proof
of satisfaction
of judgment
79 DOS 99 Matter
of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure
of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business
practices;
unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent
practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof
of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration
of respondents» licenses as acts
of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to
make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions
of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half
of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part
of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the
unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale
of real estate which did not contain a clause
making it subject to the approval
of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms
of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts
of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit
of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope
of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof
of payment
of sum
of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained
189 DOS 99 Matter
of DOS v. Naftal - listing agreements; deposits;
unauthorized practice of law; vicarious liability; amendment
of pleading to conform to the proof; improperly altering listing agreement without the consent or knowledge
of principal to show the potential commission split with buyer's broker to meet MLS requirements; preparing and submitting fraudulent MLS change notifications purporting to extend and alter listings; deposit
of escrow funds into operating account; preparation
of lease constitutes the
unauthorized practice of law; pleadings may be amended to conform to the proof and encompass a charge not stated in the complaint where the issue has been fully litigated by the parties and is closely enough related to the stated charges that there is no surprise or prejudice to the respondent; continuing to offer properties for sale after preparation
of forged listing extensions violates 19 NYCRR 175.10; DOS fails to establish violation
of 19 NYCRR 175.12 for failure to provide copy
of listing extension where extension was not authorized by principal; DOS fails to demonstrate demand for unearned commission where broker may have believed they were entitled to a commission; broker's licenses suspended for one year and thereafter until such time as restitution in the amounts
of $ 5,000.00 and $ 2,055.40 is
made