Accordingly, if VAM estimates are highly correlated to biasing factors, then it becomes impossible to
make valid interpretations about the causes of student achievement gains or losses as intended.
Not exact matches
This means that, whilst all
interpretation is provisional (which I think might be the main point you are
making) not all are equally
valid.
In interpreting his biblical texts Bultmann
made use of these ideas with a vigor which promises that his basic principles of
interpretation may survive, still seem
valid, when the misty vocabulary of Heidegger's early philosophy no longer seems compelling.
So, this means that there is ONE
valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text in such a way as to
make people ponder various
interpretations (which would be a certain kind of genre, but not most texts).
2) she
makes a very
valid point, and she is absolutely correct about the bible having many different
interpretations.
While the Old Fashioned, a Martini, and a Manhattan are all great possibilities on such an evening, they all also involve endless questions and debates regarding the right way to
make them and innumerable, mostly
valid,
interpretations.
Contrasting these two this way
makes it sound as if scientific collection of facts from «global - scale monitoring» can somehow never lead to «doom scenarios» and that, if they do, the monitoring or its
interpretation must be suspect; not really a
valid assumption afaics.
It seems most of the erroneous data the reviewer refers to initially are simply
valid disagreements on
interpretation of data, and not
making stuff up.
Stare decisis's most prominent cost is binding judges to
interpretations of law that they find unpersuasive, raising the fundamental question of when and why such a restraint on judges» decision -
making autonomy is justified.30 In an ideal world, stare decisis would insulate
valid principles of law from arbitrary and unprincipled revision without entrenching «bad» precedent against further review.31 In reality, stare decisis hinders defection from both appealing and unappealing precedent.