Sentences with phrase «make your public comment if»

The company has made no public comment if they were the owns serving the DMCA notice to the owner of the website.

«We will provide a way to make your public comment if the USFWS again pursues this misguided policy, but you can help today by sharing the petition to Secretary Zinke with 5 friends asking them to oppose the importation of trophies from elephants.

Not exact matches

If he takes the post, it would come after the New York Fed's board of directors made several public comments about seeking a diverse pool of candidates for the job.

No Lutheran pastor in my childhood ever made — whether in or out of the pulpit — a public political comment (though it was generally assumed that most of them, if they voted at all, voted Republican), and while we occasionally talked politics at home (my father was a Robert Taft isolationist Republican), the true family passion was religion.

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

I do agree that the past players have slaughtered arsenal name, but i think they have earn the right to do so, especially if arsenal was at the top when they were there, it is obvious that some of the comments are down to get ratings from the public, but in truth most of the comments made are the truth.

Even when Napoli was adamant to not sell it to any Italian club and their director made public comments like, Higuain will cheat us if he joins Juve.

The BBC has revealed senior Tory MP Bernard Jenkin wrote to Mr Carney warning him against making any «further public comment» about the EU referendum after the Governor predicted a recession if the UK votes to leave on June 23.

Matthew Parris in The Times (#): «Who can now doubt that if at the outset the Lib Dem leader had issued a one - sentence statement — «I have set up two inquiries to find out what, if anything, went wrong; I shall be making no further public comment until they report; meanwhile it must be noted that Lord Rennard continues to protest his innocence» — then he'd be in a better place now?»

Is there any chance that the products of the small group exercises can be made available for public comments, crowd - sourced if you will, and revised as the authors see fit as a result of this feedback?

Before a single child's information is turned over to any 3rd party, policymakers should give assurance to parents and educators that no harm will come to Tennessee school children by adopting the following principles: The state and districts should be required to publish any and all existing data sharing agreements in printed and electronic form, and include a thorough explanation of its purpose and provisions, and make it available to parents and local school authorities statewide; The Department of Education should hold hearings throughout the state or testify before the legislature to explain any existing data agreement, and answer questions from the public or their representatives, obtain informed comment, and gauge public reaction; All parents should have the right to be notified of the impending disclosure of their children's data, and provide them with a right to consent or have the right to withhold their children's information from being shared; The state should have to define what rights families or individuals will have to obtain relief if harmed by improper use or release of their child's private information, including how claims can be made; and finally, any legislation must ensure that the privacy interest of public school children and their families are put above the interests of any 3rd Party and its agents and subsidiaries.

The public may also request more time; if you provide justification, that will help us make a decision on whether to extend or reopen the comment period.

What seems to get the most comments and shares (if they make that information public)?

I have also read where Buffett has made the comment on diversification and that he is not hip on it, but if you look at his holdings in Berkshire he has around 90 companies, 40 public and 50 private.

If you make public comments you place your reputation at risk.

If you want to start to say «sorry» for the harm and offence you have caused with your comments why don't you accept the offers of country hospitality from «the dick - brains», learn from them, and also make sure you attend the Pacific Hydro public meeting in Portland, Victoria, scheduled for 16th February 2015 to listen to a real expert on this issue - Steven Cooper.

None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to publish or issue an assessment required under section 106 of the Global Change Research Act of 1990 unless (1) the supporting research has been subjected to peer review and, if not otherwise publicly available, posted electronically for public comment prior to use in the assessment; and (2) the draft assessment has been published in the Federal Register for a 60 day public comment period1.

The Trump EPA has proposed to repeal the CPP and has asked the public in an Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM) for comments on what if anything should replace it.

So, if you, like me, oppose further restrictions on public access to government information, make your voice heard by filing a comment.

Bottom line - don't refer to a judge as an «Evil, Unfair Witch»... Or to state it more simply, if a lawyer ought not to make a specific comment in a public speech or debate, he or she ought not to say it online, either.

I realize, though, that for many if not most lawyers, «going public» with a written thought, even a fairly anodyne one, is a step made only after hesitation and careful consideration: clients, law societies, colleagues, senior partners, judges — anyone who matters might read what you've written and have a negative reaction; the risk, though slight, can make commenting publicly a game not worth the candle.

If your position makes it politically unwise to sign your comment, choose between your position and your desire to speak openly in public.

That defence provides that, even if the statements made or comments published defame the Plaintiff, if the matter communicated about is of public interest and the defendant acted responsibly with proper diligence, defamatory statements will not attract liability.

COMMENT [1] In campaigns for nonjudicial elective public office, candidates may make pledges, promises, or commitments related to positions they would take and ways they would act if elected to office.

«If a select group of CEOs and investors, no matter how benevolent their intentions, can unilaterally make decisions about the consensus rules without public comment and force these changes upon the network regardless of overall consensus, then Bitcoin will have lost the properties that make it valuable in the first place.»