Sentences with phrase «makes him a marked man»

That form made him a marked man, as he explained to FFT: «Defenders are getting quite a bit tighter on me now, and maybe there's a defensive midfielder screening in front of me too.»

Friends and colleagues of Mora Sandoval believe his outspoken comments about the links between drug trafficking and poaching on nearby Moín beach may have made him a marked man.

Problem is, she's den mother to a cabal of ne'er - do - wells, whose armed bank robberies have made them marked men by cops, some of whom play by the rules and some of whom have no qualms with vigilante justice.

Will's newfound wealth, meanwhile, makes him a marked man.

Not exact matches

These practices have built incredible profits for owners, making Jeff Bezos the wealthiest man in the world, with Mark Zuckerberg and Google's Larry Page not far behind.

Marking the end of Canada's mission in Afghanistan by honouring the service of our men and women in uniform, including those who made the ultimate sacrifice combating the spread of terrorism;

Though they have made their mark in the private sector, these men and women are taking public stands on hot button social and environmental issues ranging from gay marriage to climate change to gender equality.

Many of the headline speakers from the previous conference will be there, including Tim Draper and Lyn Ulbricht, as well as dozens of other «smart money» investors who couldn't make it last time, including Randi Zuckerberg (Founder & CEO of Zuckerberg Media & Early Facebook executive), Mark Yusko (billionaire hedge fund manager and Wall Street money man), Nick Spanos (founder of Blockchain Technologies Corp and featured in the Netflix Banking on Bitcoin movie), David Hirsch (enforcement attorney from the SEC), and Gary Leland, from CryptoCousins.

The pay - equity policy was championed by County Executive Mark Poloncarz as a way to make sure that men and women are paid equally for doing the same work — a widely studied issue across the country.

That said, our culture seems especially eager to stretch the text of Mark 2:27: «The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.»

Besides enjoying the planning, as an outsider I was attracted to the entrepreneurial clients, interesting men with a sense of themselves who were trying to make their mark and didn't mind challenging and dismantling rigid corporate empires.»

Understandably, the frequent recurrence of such unexpected consequences in the secular world as well encourages the pathological fear of all extremisms (not including its own) that marks postmodern skepticism and helps to make what Robert J. Lifton called «Protean Man» look like an indispensable culture hero.

So it was quite shocking to most Jews when Jesus taught His followers to violate some of the Sabbath traditions (but not the Law itself), and even said that «Sabbath was made for man; not man for the Sabbath» (Mark 2:27), and that «The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath» (Mark 2:28; Luke 6:man; not man for the Sabbath» (Mark 2:27), and that «The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath» (Mark 2:28; Luke 6:man for the Sabbath» (Mark 2:27), and that «The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath» (Mark 2:28; Luke 6:Man is Lord of the Sabbath» (Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5).

And so the tale of a Green Knight with his chopped - off head still holding a knight of the Round Table to promises made is no less true than the tale of a man crammed with secrets who spontaneously combusts and leaves behind only a black, tallowy mark on the floorboards, and his story in turn is no less true than the tale of a Texas sharecropper's wife who has had a miscarriage only ten days before but just this morning was walking behind the mule and guiding the jerking plow.

Later, Mark quotes a saying of Jesus, «Don't you see that nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him «unclean»?

I think also of the Ethiopian eunuch (from Acts 8), a man who was ethnically and sexually «other,» who was welcomed and baptized without question or hesitation into the early church, but who would no doubt fail all of Mark Driscoll's rigid categories for a what makes «real man» were he a part of the American evangelical church today.

7: 11, Mark 10: 8) But the bad will is what makes the evil man evil, the greedy hard - hearted, the religious self - complacent.

It is the memorial of an agreement that deems it necessary (hence, conventional); it must be made by man (hence, artificial); yet it is marked in the organ of generation (hence, also natural).

It is not the Jewish Sabbath, the Sabbath was made for man, Mark 2:27 it was given at the beginning of time.

Mark says simply: «The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath; so the Son of man is lord even of the sabbath» (Mark 2:27 - 28, RSV).

The blindness of the disciples who do not see this yet, is then contrasted with the story of blind man (two in Matthew) who is made to see by (Matthew 20:29 - 34 and Luke 18:35 - 43; compare Mark» 46 - 52).

Make your prayer this week the prayer of the man in Mark 9:24, «Lord, I believe, help my unbelief.»

Endeavoring to explain these words upon the lips of such a man as Mark Twain, one can not say that Mark Twain had a melancholy temperament, for he made the whole world laugh.

The mark of the beast is spiritual, and identical to the pledged of allegiance to the flag, because worshipping doesn't come from a chip, or any technology device, although we are surrounded by human devices... The name of the beast is going to be written in the heart, or in the mind on those who worship the beast, because worshipping is of the heart, or of the mind... When the Germans used their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, there was no physical mark in the right hand, or forehead of the German pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, was written in the heart, or in the mind of the German pledger... When the US uses their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, there is no physical mark in the right hand, or on the forehead of the pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, is written in the heart, or in the mind of the pledger... The devil uses Romans 13 to deceive those who are pledging allegiance to the flag, because they do not believe what God said in Ex.20: 1 - 5, and De.4: 15 - 19... When a person pledges allegiance to a man, or to a flag, or to a nation, they are heading for destruction, because God said; «cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and make flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD Jer.17: 5 KJV... Whatever happened to the Germans who trusted in Hitler, or on their military power?

We are living, I have argued, in a unique period of transition, marking a transformation as far reaching in importance as the leap that occurred when that biological man began to make history thousands of years ago.

its so amazing there people is this world are so caught up in living for themselves, what if the rapture happened while reading my text, what then, will you stil care what clothes you are wearing or what what car you are driving,, while GOD is removed from this earth, and now society will have to make a real decision if they want to contine to live in sin or realize they now understand the truth and the warnings given before, but now bc of the anti christ have to denounce GOD (take the mark of the beast) or be killed, and if you do nt believe in christ now, will you be willing to die for christ then, i would rather be ridiculed by the world for being a true christian then be gay, seperated from GOD, and then cast in the lake of fire for all eternity tormented bc i refused to repent bc i wanted to live for myself, ready the story about the man in hades who to this day, still has not had a drop of water on his tongue to quench is thirst, THE BIBLE WAS WRITEN BC HELL IS REAL AND GOD IS REAL, DO NOT BE DECEIVED, YOU HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE WHO YOU WILL SERVE, THE NARROW ROAD WHICH LEADS TO LIFE OR THE WIDE, AND IF GOD CALLS YOU AND YOUR STILL ON THE FENCE, IN GODS EYES YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE A CHOICE, THE BIG QUESTION IS: WILL THE LIFE YOUR NOW LIVING BE WORTH SPENDING ETERNITY IN LAKE OF Fmake a real decision if they want to contine to live in sin or realize they now understand the truth and the warnings given before, but now bc of the anti christ have to denounce GOD (take the mark of the beast) or be killed, and if you do nt believe in christ now, will you be willing to die for christ then, i would rather be ridiculed by the world for being a true christian then be gay, seperated from GOD, and then cast in the lake of fire for all eternity tormented bc i refused to repent bc i wanted to live for myself, ready the story about the man in hades who to this day, still has not had a drop of water on his tongue to quench is thirst, THE BIBLE WAS WRITEN BC HELL IS REAL AND GOD IS REAL, DO NOT BE DECEIVED, YOU HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE WHO YOU WILL SERVE, THE NARROW ROAD WHICH LEADS TO LIFE OR THE WIDE, AND IF GOD CALLS YOU AND YOUR STILL ON THE FENCE, IN GODS EYES YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE A CHOICE, THE BIG QUESTION IS: WILL THE LIFE YOUR NOW LIVING BE WORTH SPENDING ETERNITY IN LAKE OF FMAKE A CHOICE WHO YOU WILL SERVE, THE NARROW ROAD WHICH LEADS TO LIFE OR THE WIDE, AND IF GOD CALLS YOU AND YOUR STILL ON THE FENCE, IN GODS EYES YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE A CHOICE, THE BIG QUESTION IS: WILL THE LIFE YOUR NOW LIVING BE WORTH SPENDING ETERNITY IN LAKE OF FIRE?

Adam and Eve did not make «aprons,» since kitchens had not yet been invented, but «loincloths» (Gen. 3:7) The RSV's «great men» are now «magnates» (Rev. 6:15) who behave like «tyrants» (RSV: «exercise authority» — Mark 10:42) The stilled sea is «a dead calm» (RSV: «great calm» — Mark 4:39), and acting «by nature» is now to «do instinctively» (Rom.

Mark reads: «The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath: therefore the son of man is lord also of the Sabbath.»

If an age is marked by what one observer has called «the thingification of man» the speech of the age will both record what is happening and make articulate the cries of hurt wrung out of the monstrous process.

Mark 7:20: «What comes out of a man is what makes him «unclean.»

Interesting, isn't it, that this is what Jesus tells us: «The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath» (Mark 2:27).

As the American poet and essayist Mark Signorelli has written: «Once it became common to doubt or to deny that man had any essential inclination toward beauty or truth, the purpose of making objects intended to unite beauty and truth in various ways was no longer evident.»

This was coming off of a weekend of reading about Mark Driscoll, so it may just be his particular brand that I'm responding to, but I'm amazed that some complementarians seem to believe that we should create an entire social system solely designed to keep men from feeling bad about themselves by making sure there is always someone below them on the food chain that they can rule over.

The situation was that «men have long since emptied out of the content of Christianity those marks and characteristics which alone make sense of the Divinity of Christ and the mission of a Divine Person among created beings».

This is what Jesus implies in Mark 2:27 when He says that man was not made for the Sabbath, but the Sabbath was made for man.

Being a Sheepeople is what makes for a good mark in the con - man game!

(Mark 10:2 - 9) Clearly then it is not the formal authority which is binding on men; if a man can make such distinctions in Scripture, evidently the insight to recognize what is demanded by God is attributed to him.

We miss the continuity between the two appearances partly because Matthew turned the young man into an angel and Luke made him into two men, but mainly because we do not realize that Mark is inviting us to a transition beyond discipleship.

For example, rather than insisting that a woman stay attractive for her husband lest he be tempted to cheat on her, Mark suggests that a man make his own wife his standard of beauty (and vice versa).

Missing this lesson of the young man is what makes the book of Mark so unsatisfying.

The young man is one of many exceptional figures in Mark who make cameo appearances and who seem to have the perception needed to spread the good news.

Throughout his 18 years in ministry, Mark Driscoll was well - known for making crude, demeaning comments about women and for mocking men he deemed effeminate or «pussies.»

The book that made Bonhoeffer a question mark to many minds was Letters and Papers from Prison.1 Those provocative phrases like «religionless Christianity,» «the God who forsakes us,» «Jesus as the man for others,» and similar phrases appear in context that are only in outline form without full contextual meanings.

It was under the leadership of men like Ezekiel and the exiled Temple priesthood that two customs were resurrected and made the very marks of Judaism.

Mark was a follower of Christ but did nt believe in man made religion.

Even the point about what is best for other creatures, which may seem very modern, is not without foundation in Hebrew Scriptures in such passages as the law against taking the hen - bird as well as the eggs from the nest (Deut 22:6), or this saying from Proverbs: «A righteous man has regard for the life of his beast» (12:10), where, be it noted, the quality that makes a man considerate of his working animals is not prudence or good business sense but «righteousness,» a point all the more significant when we remember that in the Hebrew Scriptures one of the marks of righteousness is not mere evenhandedness but active favor to the weak and deprived.

Indeed, it was a Pharisaic formula which Jesus expressed when he said that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath (Mark 2:27).

The acceptance of the will of God is worth any sacrifice, however surgical, that a man may be called upon to make (Mark 9.43 - 48).

Two of the most helpful of these are Mark U. Edwards, Jr.'s Printing, Propaganda and Martin Luther (1994) and Andrew Pettegree's Brand Luther: How an Unheralded Monk Turned His Small Town into a Center of Publishing, Made Himself the Most Famous Man in Europe — and Started the Protestant Reformation (2015).

For this reason the synoptic evangelists can take words originally spoken by Christian prophets (e.g. the apocalyptic Son of man sayings) and ascribe them to Jesus, and can also freely modify and reinterpret sayings in the tradition to make them express their own theological viewpoint (e.g. Mark 9.1 par.)