Not exact matches
Everything that has happened since then, including the greenhouse effect and the
hole in the
ozone layer,
makes it clear that a future world could not sustain a population of even the present number at a higher level of industrial development without reaching environmental limits.
In October 1983, Farman discovered that a huge hole had opened up in the ozone layer over Antarctica — and that it was man - mad
In October 1983, Farman discovered that a huge
hole had opened up
in the ozone layer over Antarctica — and that it was man - mad
in the
ozone layer over Antarctica — and that it was man -
made.
Still, arctic
ozone levels fell during most winters
in the 1990s,
making researchers worry that a northern
ozone hole might appear.
The whole country is aware that it is increased ultraviolet light caused by the
hole in the
ozone layer over Antarctica that
makes the sun so vicious.
Any connection with the
ozone hole that has been
made in the media is nonsense.
The SAM
in the Southern Hemisphere is similar
in that regard and the SAM has been affected by the
ozone hole and perhaps CO2 to
make for a more positive sign.
An example of this kind of surprise happened
in relation to the Antarctic
ozone hole, where unexpected chemistry on surfaces of ice particles lead to much more efficient destruction of
ozone in the polar vortex than had been expected,
making an existing concern into a serious problem.
(the «natural
ozone hole», or the lower temps
in the 1st half of the century) Ah yes, stuff is so easy to
make up, harder to demonstrate convincingly...
And, just like we could tell that the burn
in the
ozone hole was man -
made in the 80's, we can tell that we are causing this particular deviation.
The Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL)
in Eureka, Nunavut, which
made key measurements last winter used to detect and analyze the largest
ozone hole ever detected over the Arctic, will cease year - round operations on April 30.
Observations
made in the late winter and early spring of 2011 reveal
ozone loss far outside the range previously observed over the Northern Hemisphere, comparable to some Antarctic
ozone holes.
I think that this was after 1987 when doubt concerning the causes of the Antarctic
Ozone Hole were certainly politically motivated because 1 ppb of ClO measured
in the polar vortex
made scientific doubt insane.
For the first time, scientists have found convincing evidence that the gargantuan
hole carved
in the
ozone layer by man -
made chemicals is steadily shrinking.
The theory is that the
Ozone Hole, by allowing more of the UV component of the Sun's incoming radiation to
make it down to low altitude rather than being absorbed
in the stratosphere is providing an incremental energy increase to drive the strength of the SAM, and thus the degree to which Antarctica is isolated from more global weather influences.
What
made 2011 different — and a watershed — argues Michelle Santee (a JPL colleague of Manney's and coauthor on the new paper), is that at long last, «the magnitude of the [Arctic] loss is comparable to that
in the early Antarctic
ozone holes in the mid 1980s.»
However I do not find — anywhere — that temperature is involved
in the
making or breaking of
ozone, but it may well be that the «Ozone Hole» (OzH) is located above the S. Pole because it is colder than the N. Pole, after all neither pole has any sunlight at all for half the
ozone, but it may well be that the «
Ozone Hole» (OzH) is located above the S. Pole because it is colder than the N. Pole, after all neither pole has any sunlight at all for half the
Ozone Hole» (OzH) is located above the S. Pole because it is colder than the N. Pole, after all neither pole has any sunlight at all for half the year.