If they don't pay on time, or they've been hosting wild keggers,
it makes more sense to find a new, more responsible tenant.
Writers need self - discipline but if you're just starting out it can be incredibly difficult to break unhelpful habits such as checking social media, reading the news, going to grab a biscuit, making a cup of tea, playing a game... That's why, at least to start with,
it makes more sense to find a way to manage those habits alongside your writing, rather than trying to quash them entirely, so that they can co-exist happily.
So for somebody, who is looking for a long term relationship,
it makes more sense to find the compatible matches immediately instead of browsing through a database and finding out later whether the person is a match or not.
With two mouths to feed, it just
makes more sense to find an alternative.
Not exact matches
A lazy person knows there's lots of life and fun
to be experienced, so
finding the shortcuts through the slough just
makes a lot
more sense than dragging your feet down a long road.
On the average day, 39 percent of millennials interact
more with their smartphone than anything or anyone else so it
makes sense to use this tool
to help them with their finances, a Bank of America study
found.
This
makes a lot of
sense in the context of learning what doesn't work, then
making adjustments
to find more effective ways
to improve and get better results.
It wouldn't
make sense to hoard any nickels, and even still you'd have
to find someone who'd want
to pay
more than 5 cents per nickel if they did cost
more material wise, (which they do nt)
But rising gas prices — or,
more accurately, wildly fluctuating gas prices — have thrown a wrench into the calculations of Barrie homebuyers, who are
finding it difficult
to determine whether it still
makes financial
sense to live so far away from their jobs.
The factors that we have
found to make more sense are value and quality, especially when they are combined into a single strategy.
They
make a lot
more sense and contribute
to everything else from doing them, which I
find the easiest and most effective parts.
«Matching Asian people in North America is still our main product, but 60 percent of the world's population is in Asia so in order for us
to become a much bigger company and help
more people
find their life partner, it
makes sense to enter Asia,» Tokioka explained
to TechCrunch.
The first two of these habits can
make immediate
sense to the experienced Christian, but I have
found that the third — fellowship — sometimes requires a little
more explanation or cajoling.
Wouldn't it
make more sense to study the disturbed in the light of what psychiatry and psychology have
found out about people who were «possessed» in the past?
It was a relief
to find a believer who wrote a reasonable explanation of the creation story that
made more sense than I had ever read in modern evangelical publcations.
I've seen humans as nothing
more than highly evolved primates, but I've also seen them as
made in the image of God; I've seen children suffering and been convinced there is no God, but I've also
sensed God's presence as I've reached into that same suffering; I've convinced myself that doing whatever I wanted was the most exciting way
to live, but I've also
found abundant life in being humbly obedient
to Jesus.
Sometimes the most secular of scholars
found that what Frei was doing, with his attention
to narrative and his interest in the language that shapes a particular community,
made more sense to them than the work of many theologians much
more systematically concerned
to address other academic disciplines.
Until I
find something that
makes more sense (so
to speak), I must stick with what I've got.
No
more than if you
found a watch lying in the desert, running or not, that you would or could assume it happened by accident... common
sense would dictate that intelligent life had
to have
made this watch as complex things simply do not «create» themselves by accident, no matter how many millions / billions of years have passed.
We had this question about why Jesus speaks in parables that often don't
make much
sense, and so we set out traveling down this tunnel
to find the answer, and when we discover the answer, it only sparks off
more questions.
If belief in the creative and the redemptive God
makes sense at all, it must enable us
to see
more deeply and dearly into the whole of our experience, and
to find what in the end of the day all honest thought must
find there.
I still kept a round of duties, and would not suffer myself
to run into any open vices, and so got along very well in time of health and prosperity, but when I was distressed or threatened by sickness, death, or heavy storms of thunder, my religion would not do, and I
found there was something wanting, and would begin
to repent my going so much
to frolics, but when the distress was over, the devil and my own wicked heart, with the solicitations of my associates, and my fondness for young company, were such strong allurements, I would again give way, and thus I got
to be very wild and rude, at the same time kept up my rounds of secret prayer and reading; but God, not willing I should destroy myself, still followed me with his calls, and moved with such power upon my conscience, that I could not satisfy myself with my diversions, and in the midst of my mirth sometimes would have such a
sense of my lost and undone condition, that I would wish myself from the company, and after it was over, when I went home, would
make many promises that I would attend no
more on these frolics, and would beg forgiveness for hours and hours; but when I came
to have the temptation again, I would give way: no sooner would I hear the music and drink a glass of wine, but I would
find my mind elevated and soon proceed
to any sort of merriment or diversion, that I thought was not debauched or openly vicious; but when I returned from my carnal mirth I felt as guilty as ever, and could sometimes not close my eyes for some hours after I had gone
to my bed.
those verses you cited need
to be investigated and if you do an honest search you will
find that the bible will
make more sense and is not a mystery like the trinity and hellfire and the cross.
And curiously, as we relax, we
find that we are much
more than we thought we were, and become much
more, starting from where we are, and with no
sense of being bullied or
made to fit into schemes which really have nothing
to do with us.
And as far as embracing who we are
made to be by God, this is becoming
more real
to me as I
sense how the Lord works with me; I
find that He works with how He
made me without trying
to get me
to bend out of shape
to be «balanced».
If something must be eternal and we
find ourselves in a self - aware state, how is it that it
makes more sense for a non-sentience
to be eternal rather than a Person?
You said, «If something must be eternal and we
find ourselves in a self - aware state, how is it that it
makes more sense for a non-sentience
to be eternal rather than a Person?»
Most of the time it
made sense to be prepared and buy food when we
found it, since vegan options, although
more and
more plentiful, can't exactly be
found on every corner.
Though I dread waking so early in the morning (and oh do I dread it), once I
find myself in the comfort and warmth of the bakery the world seems
to make just a little
more sense.
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual
to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer
find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision -
making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little
more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary
to excel in a particular system, you continually
make half - brain purchases year after year
to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately
to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would
make positional
sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
At the same time it just didn't
make the
sense that Miami didn't
find more ways
to include him in the offense.
In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none
make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for
more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before
making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems
to have
found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player
to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not
to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed
to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough
to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed
to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't
make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford
to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills
to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been
more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related
to the failure of this club
to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)
If we are winning I have no qualms with it but if we are
finding breaking the deadlock a stubborn thing well then it
makes even
more sense to get our best dribblers out there.
This is an incredibly difficult question
to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only
to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would
make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel
to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can
make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards
to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems
to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early
to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency
to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs
to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious
to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the
more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly
makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently
to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow
to ever boss the midfield and he tends
to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always
made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed
to play Francis in a
more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet
finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready
to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him
to use Francis and then he had the nerve
to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary
to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed
to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends
to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez,
make little
to no
sense considering what he has
to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford
to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try
to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards
to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair
to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went
to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had
to choose one of those 3 players
to stay on it would be Ox due
to his potential as a plausible alternative
to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue
to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't
make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due
to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem
to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would
make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold
to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction
to heroin without the benefits
It
makes more sense to give him some time
to find back his rhythm.
we have become so reliant upon one individual
to run the whole operation that our once relevant scouting department has become so stagnant that it can no longer
find those hidden gems it once... when this occurs the management team, who by this juncture is little
more than a congregation of spefically chosen «yes» men,
making it incredibly difficult for new ideas
to emerge and / or transfers / contract renegotiations
to be dealt with in a timely and effective manner... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary
to excel in a particular system, you continually
make half - brain purchases then try desperately
to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would
make positional
sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
It
makes sense to me now
more than ever what Arsene Wenger means when he says
to find the top player (s) our team needs is not easy.
Ramsey has had one good season for us since his horrible injury, he needlessly gives the ball away much too often and his finishing is even worse than Giroud's... once again we have fallen in love with the idea of what could have been... Ramsey has only scored 2 meaningful goals in his entire Arsenal tenure: one in Turkey and the other in last year's FA Cup, which is not near enough
to make him a centerpiece of this offence... likewise simply his presence on the team sheet has led Wenger into
making horrible tactical blunders because he will force Ramsey into the lineup even when it doesn't
make sense... just think of all those games when Ramsey was played out wide on the right, which forced the RB
to come up into the play far
more often, and deeper, because Ramsey invariably would
find himself in a
more central position leaving us far
more vulnerable
to the counterattack..
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position
to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far
more questions than answers...
to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried
to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want
to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem
to have a pretty good history when it comes
to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers
to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things
to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz
to the starting lineup due
to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition
to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB
to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need
to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need
to target a CDM then do whatever it takes
to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help
make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us
to become dominant again we need
to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper
to CB
to DM
to ACM
to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil
to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed
to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed
to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had
more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could
find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time
to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just
to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye
to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need
to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had
to wait so many years
to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes
to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes
to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk
to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really
make sense that we could only
make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went
to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest
to strikers who were clearly not going
to press their current teams
to let them go
to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants
to win
more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due
to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded
more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately
to raise awareness for several years when cracks began
to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued
to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
it looks like wenger will push walcott
to CF
to compete with giroud (I wouldnt but thats how it is) and lacazette would only
make sense if he canned welbeck (which i would but do nt think wenger will) which means we will need
to find a
more aguerro type coming in from the wing... reus would work but i suspect too expensive for wenger i do like the look of vietto (but havent watched enough of villareal
to get real
sense)
But his positioning
sense means that he is always well placed
to nick the ball — he
makes an average of 1.8 tackles and 1.6 interceptions per game — and immediately looks
to find one of the Partenopei's
more creative players.
All of that brain activity can be quite tiring, so it
makes a bit
more sense that children
find it harder
to wind down than most adults do.
It
makes more sense to check the baby vaginally when approaching the delivery date, as this can let the practitioner know the position of the baby and
find out if adjustments need
to be
made (if, for instance, the baby is breached or posterior).
I know it is riskier so it
makes sense to me that it would be
more challenging
to find a care provider that would support it.
If a parent observes that there is some sign of impairment due
to a nutritional deficit (either because clinical
findings indicate as much or the parent has tuned in
to something lab results won't show), then it would
make sense to focus
more on the details.
Other political communicators may
find more trouble balancing the need
to reach different audiences in language that
makes sense to them with the need for a common and clear political message, but in some
sense that's nothing new, as anyone who's ever tried
to run a coalition knows.
In a bid
to make it easier for the long - term unemployed
to find work, Ms Flint proposed opening job centres on council estates, arguing this
made more sense than forcing people
to travel «miles»
to access services.
If that becomes law, thousands of Onondaga County filers would
find it
makes more sense to quit itemizing, too, and stick
to the bigger standard deduction.
The scientists also
found that migratory freshwater fishes are at greater risk than their marine brethren, which
makes sense considering that the avenues of travel available
to freshwater species are much
more restricted.
So if I can
find an energy source that's cheap and easy
to use, then it may
make sense to use a lot
more of that
to produce a gallon of gasoline.»