Sentences with phrase «makes real claims»

Taylor's fundamental point is that we can not expect those shared values to change our lives or make real claims on our neighbors unless we can connect them to an ultimate good - Taylor calls it a «hypergood» - that orders and judges these proximate claims and may

I may be wrong, but It appears to me that her motive is to expose IPCC claims of overconfidence in a science, which she feels is still loaded with too much uncertainty to be able to make any real claims regarding the past or projections for the future, IOW to act as sort of a «BS filter».

Not exact matches

So in other words, if you want to take out a $ 1 million line of credit, you'll probably need seven figures» worth of equipment, real estate, or other assets the bank can anchor onto — and make a claim to, in case you default.

The company claims a 30 - day snapshot makes little sense, as it makes it difficult to tease out real sales trends from short - term fluctuations, caused by things like discount programs.

Next up, anyone involved in marketing content for environmentally healthy and bio-degradable products must be able to back up any claims they make with real proof.

Oakley's goggles also do solve real problems and add nifty new capabilities to existing activities, which is a claim that many wearables can't honestly make.

The U.S. was claiming it was willing to make big reductions to its agricultural subsidies, but the recent passage of a $ 300 billion farm bill by the U.S. Congress make it unlikely that the U.S. is serious about real reductions.

Agents claim there has been a sharp increase in private — or board room — auctions where a handful of serious buyers, or their representatives, make bids in an office, typically a real estate agents» board room.

We make no claims or guarantees about future conditions in the U.S. real estate market or economy.

The Home Buying Institute makes no claims, assertions or guarantees about future real estate tends.

Here's another guy on the Internet making a shocking claim that has no possible application in real life.

They are stories and comments by real people that back up at least some of the claims made by a company.

As a matter of policy, the Home Buying Institute makes no predictions or claims about future real estate conditions.

We make no claims or assertions about current real estate conditions in Dallas, Texas, or anywhere else in the country.

The Home Buying Institute makes no claims or assertions regarding future real estate trends.

The Home Buying Institute makes no claims or assertions regarding future real estate conditions.

It is strange that the scammers spend so much money to shoot high production videos with real actors only to make ludicrous claims of a million in a month.

Would you accept the same claim being made for another god, that someone had faith in their being real, and that god sent a sign proving his or her existence

But when people go around making statements and claims that their particular supernatural explaination is just as real as the car in the street, don't be surprised that people will call them on their claim.

Plus, the gospel rejects such false humility because it makes real objective claims about real life.

I have it on good authority that Zeus is not real, but I, personally, cant prove it so I do nt make the claim.

When you can come up with an explanation of where the Y - chromosomes came from that made Jesus a REAL MAN as you CLAIM, then you will BEGIN to have credibility.

All of it can make people happy, but I'm interested in what's actually real, and claims about gods don't impress me much in that regard.

The only reason I don't have an explanation to give you is that I refuse to just make one up and claim that must be the real explanation.

Just because you make up a story you claim explains something doesn't mean it's the real explanation.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

Lindbeck is often accused of being an anti-realist or constructivist, the idea that truth claims humans make are simply ones that we make up and «construct» ourselves with no real relationship with the way things really are.

to ascribe anything but evil intent to the Pope's motives make one suspect that it is not one decision that is the real problem: it is really about the fact that the nature of Catholicism and the role of the Pope have at their core a claim so audacious as to provoke outrage.

If you merely have a lack of belief that Bigfoot is real (you do nt make the claim «Bigfoot does not exist»), why would you consider anyone that does believe in Bigfootto have done so for completely irrational reasons??

So you totally dismiss a God believed in by 1.5 billion people and make the claim your God is real while having exactly zero evidence to support your position.

But St. Thomas considered these idealistic arguments illegitimate since it was a fallacy, he claimed, to make a transition from the ideal to the real order.

The real Tom, I did not make a claim.

The real Tom Austin, why haven't you posted descriptions of any of your dreams BEFORE any events occur in real life that might make your claims plausible?

Einstein claimed in 1927 that Relativity and Quantum Mechanics prove that «a sentient being outside the universe is required to make the universe real».

In fact we have a range of Jewish and pagan attacks on early Christianity and, as we will see, both groups» sole strategy was to treat Jesus as a real wonder - worker who made blasphemous claims to divine authority.

Remember that the first Commandment makes no claim that God is the only real god there is.

The rest of his sentence doesn't make any sense grammatically unless it's «Atheists aren't claiming the world isn't real..»

You then through a hissy fit and lied a little bit (your bread and butter), made outlandish claims and then accused me of not knowing jewish history because I gave you the real history and not the folklore that shows up in the bible.

This can be a restatement of the claim made above that in him we see what it means to exist in an objectively appropriate relationship to the real.

Last year I read Tom Harpur's book The Pagan Christ, which for a noted academic like Harpur, makes wild claims, yet there is no real historic basis to them, just blind bigotry and prejudice and an extreme liberal licence to make such claims.

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

You make a lot of claims but won't back them up with real evidence.

Indeed, this concept provides Hinduism with an absorptive quality which enables it to accept any religion from any source as simply a phase of the ultimately real Brahman — so long as it does not make exclusive claims for its deity as do Christianity and Islam.

We certainly can not make any such claim without analyzing it carefully and without recognizing the real difficulties involved.

It gives it body as well as soul, it makes it claim, as everything real must claim, some characteristic realm of fact as its very own.

18:21 - 22) That means, if forgiveness is to be real, there is no question of commensurable achievements upon which the petitioner depends and bases a claim; the petition for forgiveness must be made by men who wholly renounce all claim.

justsayin... just because you claim that a majority of folks think they believe in a god... may not even be yours, does not make it real..

If you and I both claim God talks to us, but we profess very different versions of what God told us who makes the decision which of us... if either... is actually talking to the Real God?

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

Real authority, not just some made up idea of man to claim some kind of leadership...