Sentences with phrase «makes science work»

But the whole point of what makes science work is that it isn't about opinion.

Making science work better requires subtlety and diplomacy.

Making Science Work: My Career in Science Policy.

From an engineering physicist who has to «make science work».

But too often many of the hypotheses that make science work are also a bit on the esoteric side.

Not exact matches

Rather than assuming that keeping a resolution has to be hard work, science shows that the people who actually meet their goals do so by making things as easy for themselves as possible.

One of the keys to making this work, said Klawe, was acknowledging that three of these sections would all need to be on the same footing when they started the second computer science class.

But to understand how it works, you first need to know the science behind the eel's electrical system, which is made up of low - voltage electric plates that are each capable of driving.15 volts of charge.

There could also be more work done in material science, and trying to gain a better understanding of things that already exist naturally in the environment and of how to potentially make better use of them.

This isn't rocket science — those who make better choices in their home and work lives benefit themselves and those around them.

With the cost of college surging ever higher and the job market continuing to be precarious, it makes sense that science and tech degrees that provide a clear path to work in hot sectors are looking attractive.

Check them out here and here, or have a look at the science on how exercise improves work - life balance and makes your a better boss.

«Juno and her cloud - penetrating science instruments will dive in to see how deep the roots of this storm go and help us understand how this giant storm works and what makes it so special,» Bolton said in a NASA statement.

«We felt like the funding from this pack could have the greatest impact by making it possible for more women to get an education in those fields, and by giving them a platform to share their work and their passion for science.»

According to Emma Seppala — science director for Stanford University's Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education — working harder and longer hours will not necessarily make you happy or successful.

A version of the speed training program developed for this trial is now commercially available through the brain fitness company Posit Science, but the researchers are working on making other types of training available as well.

«We now know that young people who are going into the office for the first time are making decisions about who they work for not based on how much they're getting paid, but on the space design,» ASID president Randy Fiser told members of the design community at the recent Science of Design Conference at Liberty Science Center in New Jersey.

All students in the Master of Science in Information Security & Assurance Program will enjoy learning opportunities that allow for direct interaction with remarkable faculty members who have made information technology their life's work.

GFI's science and technology department is involved in the development and promotion of the science of plant - based cultured meat, dairy, and egg technologies.33 They are currently focused on core foundational work — making connections with organizations and writing white papers and «mind maps» — and as such they do not yet have a significant track record.34 They have produced Technological Readiness Assessments — documents detailing the current state of technology, and evaluating where more research is needed.35 All the research GFI does is published, so that the industry as a whole can benefit.36 One of their biggest successes over the last year are the presentations that Senior Scientist Liz Specht gave to various venture capitalist firms.

When cultural trends attempt to render science a sort of religion-less clericalism, scientists are apt to forget that they are made of the same crooked timber as the rest of humanity and will necessarily imperil the work that they do.

We do have to work and do in our society to make it better... why do I feel so good when I do social things in the community if everything only boils down to science?

There was an article recently about a young boy (12ish) who is the new math genius in the making and he is working on debunking the big bang theory with science.

That fine line between the blessings of science and healthcare; God working through people in those areas, and exchanging dependancy on God for man - made remedies that aren't what we really need...

Rather than working to tearing down this wall and making the world a better place, American society and the media continually shore up this separation between «faith» and reason, hence the comparitively sorry state of science and research in our country today.

In Science and the Modern World, metaphysics was to complete its work and thereby provide a first step in the knowledge of God to which additions could be made from religious experience.

Holding to the statement I made above, how exactly is god going to extend someones life without working through man and science?

As science learns more and more about how the Universe works, the ignorance gaps in our scientific knowledge become smaller and smaller... the same with your man made god named Jehovah.

Science says that God is irrelevant to everything we do and everything we are; that means we have to work to make everything we do and everything we are relevant; and that's hard.

Not sure I'd like to single out one person as the «father» of the theory, but whoever it may be (I'd say Lemaitre, if I had to choose), science doesn't work on the basis of leaders and followers, so your question makes no sense.

In particular Whitehead's own works Process and Reality, Science and the Modern World, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making and Modes of Thought constitute the dominant background of the line of thought developed in this book.

Response to his philosophy by Christian theologians followed soon upon the publication of his early philosophical works, Science and the Modern World in 1925 and Religion in the Making in 1926.

Lastly, and this is the part that makes me cry out in pain when I read it, Tim's denial about how science vs. religion works.

At the time Thornton had closely read The Concept of Nature (1920) and Principles of Natural Knowledge (2d edition, 1925), tended to interpret Science and the Modern World (1925) in line with these earlier works, and was acquainted with Religion in the Making (1926) though somewhat unsure what to make of its doctrine of God.2 He took comfort in Whitehead's remark concerning the immortality of the soul, and evidently wanted to apply it to all theological issues: «There is no reason why such a question should not be decided on more special evidence, religious or otherwise, provided that it is trustworthy.

Science is useful for making work easier and more productive and for making lives more secure and comfortable.

But as I hope my earlier analysis of the scientific writing on life extension made clear, there is no working picture or vision of what our lives, as individuals or living in common, might actually be like in the world that science might bring about.

The atomic clock that makes it usable works on the same underlying science as carbon - dating.

Einstein's «Jew science» works very well for making fools of your fascist agenda.

In a more recent work, Reason in the Balance: The Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier work.

This is why good teaching of the sciences always includes a considerable amount of supervised laboratory work in which students are encouraged to make experiments that will enable them to see why a particular statement has become part of the normal stock - in - trade of the scientific world.

The Decision was not made by any scientific study it was a personal decision that took H0m0s off the DSM and in turn since you cant seem to follow this the DSM is what most physcs use so in turn they like you parrot a view point so they also chime in that is how science works.

But, I don't deny his obvious work by saying proven science is made up.

This is the line taken by what in North America today is frequently described as «process thought»; its greatest exponent was the late Professor Alfred North Whitehead in his works Process and Reality (his book has been re-arranged, and provided with excellent explanatory notes by D. W. Sherburne, under the title of Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the 1920's.

Finally there is Richard Roberts in Lancaster, who has made it his life's work to engage with theology and the social sciences together and is likely to provoke considerable discussion in his next phase of publications beginning with his forthcoming Religion, Theology and the Human Sciences.

In order to understand how Whitehead developed the concept of God, one may begin by comparing his earlier works such as The Principles of Natural Knowledge (1919) and The Concept of Nature (1920) with his later works such as Science and the Modern World (1925), Religion in the Making (1926) and Process and Reality (1929).

I don't know the science behind it but letting the dough rest makes it stretchy and pliable and so much easier to work with.

As with any grain - free bread, this one relies on some magic tricks of food science to really make it work, so you'll want to be cautious if you have to substitute any ingredients.

I have since made it again, to be sure it works, and we have been eating it all weekend — in the name of science, of course — while all cooped up inside the house.

I confess that I have become somewhat blasé about the range of exciting — I think revolutionary is probably more accurate — technologies that we are rolling out today: our work in genomics and its translation into varieties that are reaching poor farmers today; our innovative integration of long — term and multilocation trials with crop models and modern IT and communications technology to reach farmers in ways we never even imagined five years ago; our vision to create a C4 rice and see to it that Golden Rice reaches poor and hungry children; maintaining productivity gains in the face of dynamic pests and pathogens; understanding the nature of the rice grain and what makes for good quality; our many efforts to change the way rice is grown to meet the challenges of changing rural economies, changing societies, and a changing climate; and, our extraordinary array of partnerships that has placed us at the forefront of the CGIAR change process through the Global Rice Science Partnership.

She continued: «We signalled our willingness to work with MPI to ensure its proposed science definition is robust in meeting shared objectives around consumer confidence and authenticity, and will be making a detailed submission on behalf of industry.

This dish requires no measurements or rocket science, and works with most anything you have in the fridge, which makes it a particularly good way to get my two young daughters involved in the cooking process (and ensure they'll eat it after it's made).