Since those kids are more likely to be poor and from minority groups,
it makes subgroup accountability per se unnecessary.
Not exact matches
With respect to the research on test - based
accountability, Principal Investigator Jimmy Kim adds: «While we embrace the overall objective of the federal law — to narrow the achievement gap among different
subgroups of students — NCLB's test - based
accountability policies fail to reward schools for
making progress and unfairly punish schools serving large numbers of low - income and minority students.
The 100 percent proficiency target set by No Child, for example, was an ambitious statement that all kids should get the education they need to write their own life stories, while AYP's emphasis on
subgroup accountability made clear that states, districts, and schools need to do well by all children, regardless of who they are.
His amendments, for example, would require state
accountability systems to set performance, growth, and graduation targets for all students, including all
subgroups of students, and
make performance against those targets matter for all schools.
States also
made significant adjustments to their
accountability models, including ensuring high schools are held accountable for graduation rates, bolstering
subgroup accountability, and strengthening the criteria schools and districts must meet before they are no longer deemed low - performing.