The difference is obvious: the IPCC has declared CO2 emissions trading to be an effective instrument that
makes subsidies for renewable energy unnecessary.
Not exact matches
The deal, long in the
making after Entergy signaled it would shutter the FitzPatrick plant in 2017, comes after state regulators put the final approval on new
subsidies for renewable fuels, including nuclear power, potentially worth millions of dollars.
Stop hiding behind the façade that an arms trade treaty will
make a difference; stop promoting arms sales to dictators; and transfer the support and
subsidy enjoyed by the military companies to growing industries, such as the quest
for renewable energy.
Fossil fuel interests are using their clout at the White House and in Congress to sabotage every
renewable energy program that comes along, while
make sure massive government
subsidies, on the order of $ 100 billion a year when you count it all up, continue to flow to the fossil fuel industry (U.S. military expenditures are $ 500 billion a year, and good chunk of that is devoted to protecting overseas oilfields,
for example).
'' «Austerity - whacked Europe is rolling back
subsidies for renewable energy, as economic sanity
makes a tentative comeback,» London Globe and Mail columnist Eric Reguly observed.
«Yet the report stops short of
making the most obvious recommendations to address this challenge, eliminating the
subsidies and forcing
renewable energy generators to pay
for the costs they impose on the grid because of their intermittency and unreliability.
In order to stay online, these reliable plants may require one or all of the following options
for remedy: 1) further economic support to
make up
for losses in energy markets, 2) a new revenue stream from capacity markets, or 3) immediate termination of
subsidies and mandates
for renewables.
Moreover, I would suggest that those of us in «the electorate» who are well - informed about this issue are well aware that changes in public policy — including putting a price on carbon pollution, directly regulating GHG emissions, and providing effective support
for the development and deployment of efficiency and
renewable energy technologies on a scale at least comparable to the
subsidies that fossil fuels have received
for a century — are far more effective than the options that any individual can currently choose, and are in fact crucial to
making more such options available to all of us.
But most big countries have various incentives
for renewable energy or solar specifically,
making it hard to know who's really getting more help (and if one country is getting a lot more help than others, by buying their products you are getting a
subsidy from their government, so that's not bad either).
Brian has already
made the case
for why feed - in tariffs rule in promoting clean energy, and while the UK government's stinging u-turn remains a case study in how not to do them, Germany's more measured reduction in solar
subsidies shows, Feed in Tariffs (FiTs) are widely regarded as the most effective policy measure
for promoting
renewables that we have available to us.