Sentences with phrase «makes the distinction so»

I think I'm beginning to understand why you make this distinction so sharply, but «family» smacks of hierarchy, exclusivism, and subservience of some to the goals of the dominant member to me.

Not exact matches

You can't just be a great tasting beer or a great fitting floor mat; you have to position every other alternative, so consumers can make a clear distinction between what you stand for and everyone else.

So while Nooyi was right to anticipate the health trend, her fun / better / good distinction may no longer make sense.

I love the balanced distinction Tanya makes between something being important to share with others vs. being so «important to me that I don't hide it.»

Companies often confuse this content with what belongs in the awareness stage, so it's important to make a distinction in the buyer journey.

In his response, Austin made an interesting point: although there is certainly a distinction to be made between investments from private companies and SOEs, there is also one to be made between the different kinds of SOEs.

The various forms of Governments today are trying to make a distinction between the two, but find it difficult to separate because the two have been in bed together for so long its hard to really separate.

«A distinction must be made,» the Instrumentum Laboris says, «between those who have made a personal, and often painful, choice and live that choice discreetly so as not to give scandal to others, and those whose behavior promotes and actively — often aggressively — calls attention to it.»

So, they make a distinction between «killing» and «murder.»

So how do we make those distinctions?

«I take issue with the word to a certain degree, so I make a distinction between a capital E and a small e. I was in the Caribbean in 2004, watching the election returns with a group of friends, and when Fox News, in a state of delirious joy, announced that evangelicals had helped sway the election, I realized this word has really been hijacked.

In 2012, when the Obama administration first proposed the so - called HHS mandate, requiring employers to provide insurance coverage that included free access to contraceptive and abortive drugs, it provided an exceedingly narrow religious exemption from the rule that echoed some of the distinctions first made in these earliest incarnations of the English tradition of toleration.

So, while it may be problematic to make too much of the distinction between Scripture and Christ, I think that evangelicalism will benefit from a reminder that our faith centers around the living person of Jesus Christ — the World Made Flesh — not on the sacred texts that point to him.

True, there are things which «feel» good that are in fact good, so where is the distinction to be made?

we are born with a nature of sin, that which is unlike God, hence, Jesus tells Nicodemus, «You must be born again», even going so far as to make a distinction between that which is flesh and that which is spirit.

So we are making a distinction according to the implication parameter.

So as you are reading the Bible and seeking to follow Jesus, remember these distinctions, and many of the tough texts will begin to make a lot more sense.

I think the reason for this objection is that Cobb has not kept in mind the distinction I have made between inheritance from a dominant past occasion and oblique inheritance from occasions in the past which are contiguous but «at a slant,» so to speak (PPCT 328).

This similarity between mythical thinking and the I - Thou relation is made explicit through Professor (and Mrs.) Frankfort's use of Buber's distinction between I - It and I - Thou, their identification of myth with the dynamically reciprocal I - Thou relation in which every faculty of man is involved, and their recognition of the unique and unpredictable character of the Thou — «a presence known only in so far as it reveals itself.»

This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly, of our way of life: our obsession with sex, violence, and the pornography of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,» and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom of choice, especially with the constraints of marital and familial ties; our preference for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or be judged; our indifference to the needs of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion, that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.

In case one were to think of a house, consisting of cellar, ground - floor and premier étage, so tenanted, or rather so arranged, that it was planned for a distinction of rank between the dwellers on the several floors; and in case one were to make a comparison between such a house and what it is to be a man — then unfortunately this is the sorry and ludicrous condition of the majority of men, that in their own house they prefer to live in the cellar.

So you would make a distinction between Christianity, Christians, and the Church looking to Christ as founder (which would seem to be consistent with what I propose) but then in terms of «a new movement» would in agreement with Bernardo that Paul is the founder of the church (or «new movement») whithout which Christianity would not exist.

Girard is right to make this distinction, of course, and even right to do so with a degree of prophetic fervor; but the dangers of his method are many: he risks leaving Israel behind and so, in consequence, the world.

Whitehead himself does not explicitly make such a distinction, so my analysis involves an interpretative component which goes beyond a strict exposition of Whitehead.

It would appear that Hartshorne is here depending, in effect, if not in so many words, upon something like the distinction made in the Thomistic theory of analogy between what is meant by an analogical term (the res significata) and how the term means (its modus significandi)(Thomas Aquinas 1964, 56 - 59, 66 - 71).

Jesus was believed to have been raised to heaven by God, and in so far as this was spoken of in terms of resurrection no distinction was made between resurrection and ascension.

«One of the effects of modern liberal Protestantism has been gradually to turn religion into poetry and therapy, to make truth vaguer and vaguer and more and more relative, to banish intellectual distinctions, to depend on feeling instead of thought, and gradually to come to believe that God has no power, that he can not communicate with us, can not reveal himself to us, indeed has not done so and that religion is our own sweet invention» (p. 479).

On the question of whether the formation and transmission of prophetic utterance was predominantly written or oral a distinction ought to be made between two types of canonical prophetism, the liturgical and the so - called diwan type.

In some strange way, the lover is an «I» in contact with a «thou,» yet he is also made one with the other so that a true union of lives takes place without the slightest loss or diminishment of the distinction between the two who have become one.

Furthermore, death is decisive in its absolute certainty and equality: not only does it come to all, but it makes all equal, obliterating the distinctions that we make so much of in life.

This distinction shows that the Greek word graphe was not any old writing but «specific» writings of the so called «Old Testament» which makes it a proper noun, thus the capitalization.

Because much of the pioneering work in this type of research was done by members of the Frankfurt School of Social Research (notably H. Marcuse, M. Hochheimer, T. Adorno, W. Benjamin), known for so - called Critical Theory, the great variety of this research is distinguished from the administrative by calling it critical research, following the distinction made in 1941 by Paul Lazarsfeld, a pioneer of modern administrative research.

So, as Catherine and Micah pointed out, the passage about women not wearing jewelry and fine clothes can serve as a reminder that we are to avoid materialism and make sure that class distinctions do not get in the way of loving others and sharing the gospel.

On the other hand I hold that the technical expression so many philosophers have used as though it were self - explanatory and unambiguous — «the absolute» — is viciously ambiguous and that the more nearly self - explanatory term «independent» is safer, provided one makes explicit what the entity so described is independent of, whether everything else or only some other things, and according to what principle the distinctions are made.

Now I think that in making this distinction Whitehead makes a good and original initial point; because it is the fact that philosophers, by instinct, always think heterogeneously about nature, whereas scientists, equally by instinct, don't, which, more than any one thing, makes the philosophy of science so unreal a subject for actual research scientists.

From the pandemic of pornography to reality T.V., to the insatiable urge so many feel to make the whole of life a performance on Facebook and Twitter, the distinction upon which civilization has depended — a careful demarcation between the public and the private — is dissolving before our eyes.

Unfortunately, some of these positions have become so inextricably linked to orthodox Christianity that it's hard to make a distinction between questioning them and questioning God himself.

To most mission - sending agencies, even today, they don't make the distinctions well, so everything that does not fit into Euro - American ideas of culture is suspect or even demonic.

Hmmm, you and I usually see eye - to - eye on things, so, maybe i am missing a piece of information or fine point or distinction you were trying to make...?

(Although, to be fair, the Catechism doesn't go so far as to say the unensouled body isn't a body at all; it does, however, make the distinction between an unensouled «body of matter» and an ensouled «living, human body.»)

So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.»

So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by FAITH.»

The distinction between Creator and creation — and so the one between creature made in God's image and the rest of creation — disappears.

So by saying Jesus is the gospel, you can make a distinction between the gospel and the bible.

These people use religion as a tool for violence and i am ashamed so many people in america can not make this distinction.

He would certainly have regarded faith as more important than hope if he had been forced to make a distinction of that kind between two terms of such supreme significance and so intimately connected in his mind.

This was in distinction to the so - called «witty» preaching which sought to impress the congregation by a display of erudition, making extensive use of classical allusions and delighting in literary flourishes.

Ronald Reagan apparently gave this distinction to the the third Sunday in July, so I figured it was time to make ice cream...

As early as 1892, J.H. Hart, the superintendent of the Royal Botanical Gardens in Trinidad, reported: «We do not make any specific distinction between the Capsicums from here for the simple reason that they degenerate so quickly to a simple form under cultivation that we can not refer to them as more than a single species.

When I set out to make an oven pancake (or German pancake or Dutch baby or puff pancake — I never did find a clear distinction between the terms, so pick your favorite), I didn't think it would be difficult; I just had no idea it would be this easy.