Sentences with phrase «making a profit on player»

According to Don Balon, this has not put off Atletico offering Chelsea the chance to make a profit on the player they signed from Real during the close - season.

For years he managed to stay in the top four whilst making a profit on player transfers.

When was the last time we made profit on a player we sold (who didn't come through the academy obvs)?

The club is certainly in a position where they don't need to make a profit on every player they shell out a few million for.

Not exact matches

Thus, with an average profitability of roulette on smart - contracts from a single bet (transaction) of 2.7 %, the network commission before the growth of ETH rate ranged from 0.5 to 0.8 %, which made it possible to accumulate profits and charge each player with project tokens, guaranteeing profit from all bets.

Pogba is now closing in on a big - money move which will see the Italian club make a huge profit on the player they signed for free three years ago, in what will be a big blow for Premier League clubs who'd also hoped to sign him this summer.

Club has NO ambition and WONT spend big on the players that will really make a difference, they are happy with 4th and just ticking over making a huge profit and raping the fans week in week out and IMO Wenger does what he can and is half to blame and half not.

However, it doesn't appear as though he'll have much success with an enquiry for Pulisic, as Dortmund's intention is pretty clear in that they wish to keep him at the club for as long as possible and not view him as a means of making a healthy profit on a player that they've played a key role in developing.

Today's game is not about making money on players, but balancing the books and making the profit on off field merchandise.

Kevin De Bruyne is said to be very close to completing a # 17m to Wolfsburg, a move that will see Chelsea make a profit of over # 10m on a player who has made just two Premier League starts.

Even so, the Spaniards will make a hefty profit on the player they signed for # 6.5 m from Valencia if City (or anyone else for that matter) matches Isco's # 17.5 m release clause.

Salah looks likely to become another of the young players farmed out by Stamford Bridge, before being sold at a profit having not truly made a mark on the Pensioners» first team.

guys obviously your both passionate Arsenal fans and your both right in what you say but i have to agree with @Nothing changed, up until three years ago when we made new contracts with our sponsors which put us up there financially with the elite of Europe but the quality or quantity of signings did not match the finances, lets not forget we made a profit from sale of players against buying players and add that to your annual profits that's not acceptable, its a load of bull that we couldn't sign Lamar on time we had almost three months to do so, and regarding playing sexy football, what happen to it?

A new stadium will bring in extra cash which spuds will use to beter themselves unlike Arsenal who are making a profit from sale of players on top of annual profits

Fletcher's former club Burnley will be due 15 per cent of any profits Wolves make on the player they signed for # 7 million in 2010.

In the last transfer window we sold three players to be able to buy ONE — the club is run on a blue print of you can only spend what profit you make.

Think about the sell on profit for a player that qualifies for HG, even if he doesn't make it at Arsenal.

@Fatboy Gooner The Ozil deal was far less that 40 plus million as has been exposed on football leaks it was more in the region of 32 million with verious clauses that enable REM to take a percentage of any profit we make on selling Ozil and I would assume there are similar attachments with the Sanchez deal, even our record signings are clouded in smoke and mirrors so let not run away with the idea that its all SWengers fault, if your employer is on your back and pushing for results then you perform at a higher rate and push harder where as Wenger has no push from above so does nt go out of his way Kroenke does nt have the culture around him to win trophies cos thats not his aim and that filters down to the grass roots at Arsenal and shows in Wengers transfer policy and in the players performance.

But the most worrying thing is with our new deals even if were not in the top four aslong as we spend nothing on transfers and sell 1 or 2 players we'll make a profit.

wenger has made the club profit this window i would have though as well all incomings have been covered out goings and other revenues coming in like c / l monies and squad releases wages being saved i bet we are in a + balance if we went through it properly we do nt know what the budget is so it could be worst there now way wenger has spend # 100 not even # 70 million transfers ospina = covered by the sales of miquel and monies made from cesc to chelsea so nothing really spend there debuchy = covered by the vela money chambers = covered by the vermalen sale # 11 million only goes up to # 16 if he does well in certain circumstances sanchez = covered by the c / l monies and no doubt what we are owed on previous player sales i.e cesc to barca and song monies still outstanding welbeck = covered by wages being freed up and the rest of outgoing transactions and previous player sales being owed so there we have most likely recoup most if not all of our transfer monies back and shafted and lied to puma and the emirates about spending there monies in sponsorship on tranfers and pocketing in» profit» aprox # 60 - 70 million of the transfer funds to boot wenger hang your head in shame

On this basis it is tottenham who are the best purchasers of players, they made a profit of # 55m in the last five years putting their squad together.

The Spaniard was in fantastic form for the Swans last season after joining the club for just # 2million, and although they are keen not to lose a key player, they could be set to make a huge profit on Michu with their slapping a price tag of over # 25million on his head.

We have got to get ruthless now, who ever is not pulling their weight has got to be dropped or moved on, we have become some dormant and stagnant club who are just proud of making profits and so called promoting youth and buying unknown players that are turned into stars..

With the extra money and physical punishment, we should make progress on players profiting off of their likenesses and a student - athletes» bill of rights first.

Call for Stan K's sell of his shares to Usmanov who is ready to smash cash on big name player signings than Stan who only always looks at cash reserve and abnormal profits made for him by Wenger's economic policy at the club.

Having signed him from Fulham last year for just # 500,000, Celtic are in line to make a huge profit on the player, although naturally Rodgers will want to keep hold of him to spearhead their continued domestic success while also trying to make a splash in Europe next year.

Aston Villa paid Racing Genk # 7m (via the Guardian) for Benteke and the Midlands side stands to make a massive profit on their top - scorer and have been linked with moves to replace the player with Tottenham's Emmanuel Adebayor (via ESPN).

You have to admire Chelsea, who have made a huge profit on a player who never even managed to score a goal for them.

The hype that says we must spend profits until we have no more left (like Man U) on players that are overpriced and in the hope that one might make the grade..

Chelsea will only consider selling the player if they can make a profit on the # 32m that they spent on him two years ago, but this is unlikely to deter the mega-rich French champions.

There are two full months of football for us to enjoy, or suffer defending on how things go, before the winter transfer windo0w opens up, but Arsenal fans will be hoping that Arsene Wenger is already working on which players to sign in January, especially after the club made a profit this summer when all of thought it was going to be a splash the cash sort of affair.

Kovas is keen to bring the player with him to Bayern Munich, meaning Madrid could make a quick profit on the player this summer.

Day to day you may not see much movement in your portfolio as a player's development takes time but if you invest in a player that eventually makes a name for themselves on the big stage then you may just make a very tidy profit.

If he does move this summer, then Ajax would have made a handsome profit on the player, who signed as a 16 - year - old for just $ 1 million.

I am satisfied that, at the moment, I have decent enough numbers of shares in these players and others, who in my view all have great potential, at a good price, and that many, if not all of them, will increase in value enough for me to make a decent profit on them at some point before the 3 years on the shares is up.

-- Before last August's last minute brain fart to spend # 30m on Moussa Sissoko, Spurs had actually made a small net profit on player trading over the previous six years.

With the sale, Dortmund made the biggest one - season profit on a player in the history of the sport.

It hurts me as a true loving fun of Arsenal far away back here in Ghana.The pending current setbacks of our darling club is disheartening in the sense that, Mr Kroenke as the major shareholder should compare Arsenal to other big clubs in europe on how they achieve their goals by investing in players and other managerial aspects.He should change his way of thinking about making profit out of the club rather, spending should be his priority.You can never have a competitive squad without improving on the players you have by adding new players who are enough to compete rather than selling the few talents that you already have, this will never help.

In fact, the new state of teh art training ground was paid for from the profit Wenger made on Nicolas Anelka, a player bought for # 500k but sold for over # 20 million.

The Blues had an incredible 38 players on loan at other clubs across Europe and before this season, it looked like the club were stockpiling talent in order to make a profit.

Juventus could also make a tremendous profit from a player they got on a free transfer from the Red Devils.

Pallister left United in 1998, nearly ten years after he signed for the Old Trafford club, heading back to Middlesbrough for # 2.5 million, with Ferguson again making # 200,000 profit on the player he brought to the club nine years before.

Absolutely, but pointing out how difficult something is doesn't excuse you from doing a half - assed job and then squirting it out on to the internet hoping not just to recoup the minimal expense you invested but to actually maximise the profit you can make by handing PC players an inferior, underdeveloped product.

Their prevalence and effect on gameplay loops have annoyed players, but clearly not enough to set off the huge profits that publishers make off them.

And it can never be a guarantee, since pegged currencies are usually traded on an open market, meaning that institutions or companies trying to keep their values fixed to a peg always have to contend with players who want to make a profit out of trading them above or below their target prices.