Sentences with phrase «making a profit on transfers»

If your answer is YES, then the only problem here is the owner who has not sack Wenger because he obviously love what the man (Wenger) is doing for him... making money like we did this summer making a profit on transfers when other clubs were spending lots of money upgrading their teams.

A few surprises, tottenham are 20th and the only PL Team to make a profit on transfers.

In fact it wouldn't surprise me if Wenger actually made a profit on transfers this summer if he has a big clearout and only brings in a few new ones.....

We made a profit on our transfers.

On that basis the underdogs are tottenham, they are the only team in the PL to make a profit on transfers in the last five years.

Over the last five years tottenham are the only PL team to make a profit on transfers.

Not exact matches

Money transfer start - up Transferwise is more focused on driving growth than making a profit, Matt Briers said.

And Levy is keen to reward Pochettino for his good work in building a young squad that is on course to secure Champions League qualification for next season, as well as seeing the club make a profit in the transfer market.

In the last transfer window we sold three players to be able to buy ONE — the club is run on a blue print of you can only spend what profit you make.

@Fatboy Gooner The Ozil deal was far less that 40 plus million as has been exposed on football leaks it was more in the region of 32 million with verious clauses that enable REM to take a percentage of any profit we make on selling Ozil and I would assume there are similar attachments with the Sanchez deal, even our record signings are clouded in smoke and mirrors so let not run away with the idea that its all SWengers fault, if your employer is on your back and pushing for results then you perform at a higher rate and push harder where as Wenger has no push from above so does nt go out of his way Kroenke does nt have the culture around him to win trophies cos thats not his aim and that filters down to the grass roots at Arsenal and shows in Wengers transfer policy and in the players performance.

Dein was the man who made transfers happen when Wenger 1st arrived and the club has never replaced him, well they got Gazidis but all he has done is focus on profit.

But the most worrying thing is with our new deals even if were not in the top four aslong as we spend nothing on transfers and sell 1 or 2 players we'll make a profit.

Assuming we do make 2 more good signings for the 2 more than Wenger wants then we could have another summer transfer window which sees us spending a lot again, if we can make a profit on Ramsey / Kante musical chair game then it would give funds to add towards a signing in Jan... Or a last min deal on a CB...

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

wenger has made the club profit this window i would have though as well all incomings have been covered out goings and other revenues coming in like c / l monies and squad releases wages being saved i bet we are in a + balance if we went through it properly we do nt know what the budget is so it could be worst there now way wenger has spend # 100 not even # 70 million transfers ospina = covered by the sales of miquel and monies made from cesc to chelsea so nothing really spend there debuchy = covered by the vela money chambers = covered by the vermalen sale # 11 million only goes up to # 16 if he does well in certain circumstances sanchez = covered by the c / l monies and no doubt what we are owed on previous player sales i.e cesc to barca and song monies still outstanding welbeck = covered by wages being freed up and the rest of outgoing transactions and previous player sales being owed so there we have most likely recoup most if not all of our transfer monies back and shafted and lied to puma and the emirates about spending there monies in sponsorship on tranfers and pocketing in» profit» aprox # 60 - 70 million of the transfer funds to boot wenger hang your head in shame

Waiting is frustrating me, either get him or move on and admit to use fans that we want to make a profit each year from transfers rather than invest in the time of need.

It's hard to believe with less than 2 weeks to go in the transfer market we're on our way to make another profit from transfer dealings!

For years he managed to stay in the top four whilst making a profit on player transfers.

The Arsenal's chief executive made a few comments today (recently) regarding the clubs profits for the last 6 months and the record funds spent on transfers.

There are two full months of football for us to enjoy, or suffer defending on how things go, before the winter transfer windo0w opens up, but Arsenal fans will be hoping that Arsene Wenger is already working on which players to sign in January, especially after the club made a profit this summer when all of thought it was going to be a splash the cash sort of affair.

There was even a report the other day claiming that people at Arsenal were concerned that the German was not even putting in the effort in training, and a Metro report explains that the reason for this is probably Ozil's anger at what he sees as the failure of Arsene Wenger in the transfer market this summer, when the Frenchman did break the club's spending record on Lacazette but also made a net profit.

Most Arsenal fans will be the first to tell you that the Gunners are not quite firing on all cylinders so far this season, and after the summer transfer window saw the club actually make a profit rather than spending big to catch up with our Premier League rivals despite breaking the club's transfer record to sign Alexandre Lacazette, you won't find too many Gooners who are confident that the EPL title is on it's way back to north London next May.

Once the share price has risen enough where you can make a profit you can either sell the shares instantly or you if you think the transfer rumour will last a few days or weeks you can hold on to the shares to see if they attract any media buzz dividends.

Chelsea signed Oscar back in 2012 from Internacional in a # 25m deal and he is under contract until 2017, which means the Blues could make a descent profit on his transfer, with a summer bid of around # 40m or more.

Therefore they will hope to command a massive transfer fee, making a healthy profit on the minuscule fee they paid for him just a year ago.

Juventus could also make a tremendous profit from a player they got on a free transfer from the Red Devils.

In case you sell a property booked by you before you get it registered or take the possession, the taxability of profits made on such sale will depend on the time interval between your date of booking the property (or) the date of agreement to transfer your right in the under construction property.

One approach is to make a platform «Second Tier» — in other words, don't make the primary investment there, recoup on other platforms and then transfer the game to grab additional profits with minimal investment and risk.

The South Korean government has proposed that a transfer income tax which levies taxes on the profits made through cryptocurrency sales.

The South Korean government's crypto tax task force has proposed a «transfer income tax that levies taxes on profits» made from crypto sales, FNN writes, adding that «If income from virtual currency transactions is considered temporary and irregular, other income taxes may be imposed.»