Not exact matches
This is the first thing we talk
about in Lean Startup because you can not do any of the techniques of Lean Startup — the rapid experimentation, the scientific approach, the broad development — none of it
makes any sense and can't work unless you have a
vision for what you are trying to accomplish.
Some of the lawmakers who won't attend will instead host an alternative State of the Union — a meeting «to talk
about our opposition to these racist policies that are being put out of the White House and to
make sure we put out our own aggressive
vision of what our America looks like as we take it back,» according to Jayapal.
Knowing your history will
make you more confident
about the present and future by showing you where you've been and how far you've come, providing proof that you've advanced, and an inspirational
vision of how far you could go.
Being an entrepreneur means having a dream, a grand
vision about what must be changed in the world to
make it better.
«From the start, you should be thinking
about the type of company you want to build and then
make sure your systems and decisions support that
vision,» Wertz advises founders.
We spent a lot of time talking to investors
about what we are trying to do and
making sure they are on board with this
vision.
It's
about selling these within that
vision,
making the more difficult measures easier to swallow.
The more detailed and specific
about where you want to go, the higher the chances of your
vision coming to fruition because those who join and follow will know exactly how they can help to
make it happen.
«I had more of a worker mentality before and my SBDC training
made me think
about overall
vision, how to think
about sales and marketing,
about financial analysis, and
about how to be a good leader.
«It wasn't until we got aligned on that
vision that we started talking
about numbers and decided to
make a deal... It's that shared goal to help connect everyone in the world.»
Great leaders
make time to reflect and think
about the long - term
vision of their companies and their careers.
In a business, your employees don't start with a shared
vision, so
make sure everyone is clear
about the end goal — and why it matters.
The venture capitalists I interviewed for my book Hungry Start - up Strategy: Creating New Ventures With Limited Resources and Unlimited
Vision (Berrett - Koehler, 2012)
made it clear that they talk to
about 1,000 ventures a year and invest in one or two.
Thinking
about the future tends to get most of us excited, we get that feeling of «what could be» and it spurs us to action to
make our future
vision a reality.
If companies spent as much time
making sure the basic information is there as they did on writing vague paragraphs of inspiration
about some greater company
vision that no one understands, we'd all be happier.»
From the start, you should be thinking
about the type of company you want to build and then
make sure your systems and decisions support that
vision.
While there's still a lot of work to be done, we believe that the combination of our global ridesharing network with the cutting - edge software and hardware being built by our teams will
make this
vision a reality — and we couldn't be more excited
about what's next.
Secondly, we have a
vision (and a responsibility) to
make it safe and easy to buy, sell and learn
about Bitcoin.
The real special thing
about the
Vision and what
makes it really stand apart from the crowd is that not only is the blade adjustable, but it is also at a slight slant like in the Merkur 37C.
hodl was an accidental typo for hold in a bitcoin forum
about holding onto one's crypto assets long term, in an effort to support the project's long term
vision vs
making a quick buck day trading coins in a speculator fashion.
Alexandra Samuel, a technology researcher, a former colleague of ours here at
Vision Critical and a special guest in our webinar, recently wrote a piece for The Globe and Mail
about Cambridge Analytica, and she
makes many great points.
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth
about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine
about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition
made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical
vision to even
make our argument for inclusion»?
But before expressing this belief, Fr Holloway
makes a general remark
about the nature of scientific knowledge which may serve as an introduction to Polanyi's refutation of Scientific Positivism and his proposal that science is Personal Knowledge: «It is most significant that here, as so very often in the discoveries of science, it was not the inductive data which was the real beginning of the breakthrough in knowledge, but a deductive
vision glimpsed through scanty data which thrilled and excited the mind... from then on the hunt is up for the clues and the final proof.»
There are, to be sure, several moments in which he seems altogether serious
about the truth claims
made for his
vision.
Leo and other World
Vision staff are located
about 200 miles from where the earthquake
made the most damage in the southern coast of Mexico.
B, which religions are you talking
about when you
make the large claim, «In other religions we have no pretense that someone is talking
about his own private
vision, or that stuff is more or less poetic.
At first Wieman was tremendously excited
about Whitehead's metaphysical
vision, especially in Religion in the
Making.
As you do so, think
about taking a moment to
make this «lowly, precious, and pure» gift available to others: Donate to World
Vision, charity: water, or another organization working to provide clean and healthy water to the world.
Even the modern Unitarian, insofar as he or she would
make claim to the Christian name whatever may be thought
about theological definitions of Jesus Christ's significance, will say that his or her religion is toward God as God is defined by Jesus Christ — which is to say that the specifically Christian understanding of God must be in terms of what Whitehead styled «the Galilean
vision.
You may not have a written one, but each time a decision has to be
made about prioritising this or that there will be some underlying
vision of how things should be that will determine the outcome.
Actually just finished «
Making Vision Stick» and I kept thinking, he needs
about 300 more pages on this stuff!
But the picture is so utterly lacking in any serious theological
vision that all the audience hears is a mishmash of words gleaned from popular culture's assumptions
about the man called Jesus — references to love, kingdom, power, sin, guilt, anger, forgiveness, not to mention that constant, most oppressive of all forces, the one who
makes ultimate demands, God himself.
«We need a positive
vision that talks
about rebuilding the social safety net,
making sure nobody is left to go destitute in the sixth - richest country in the world.
Instead, it implies that on the question of God reason properly functions, not neutrally or independently of a faith commitment, but in the service of the explication of the
vision of faith which
makes thinking
about God possible.
We need to
make three remarks
about this passage: first, the
vision takes place in the Temple.
But as I hope my earlier analysis of the scientific writing on life extension
made clear, there is no working picture or
vision of what our lives, as individuals or living in common, might actually be like in the world that science might bring
about.
Secondly, Norman Cousins has recently proposed that some foundation establish a Commission on the World's Future
made up of eminent scientists and humanists with moral
vision who would devote themselves to thinking
about the problem of survival and fulfillment in the future.
The artist of
vision and fantasy expects us to learn something
about ourselves by having
made a sojourn through fantasy, to probe our spiritual nature, to grow in experience, to resolve our lives toward new directions.
Perhaps what's most interesting
about his new book - The Difference God
Makes: A Catholic
Vision of Faith, Communion, and Culture (Crossroad, 384 pages,...
Perhaps what's most interesting
about his new book - The Difference God
Makes: A Catholic
Vision of Faith, Communion, and Culture (Crossroad, 384 pages, $ 26.95)- is the sheer fact of it, for no one besides Cardinal George has both the talent and the ecclesial weight to attempt what he's after in the book.
How can a civilization that fails to
make provision for the next generation» or even to bring
about the next generation at all» hope to give a compelling account of itself before a world of competing
visions of the human future?
Only such a religious
vision makes possible Whitehead's language
about God, and quite naturally Whitehead's fullest speech
about God is dipolar, in that it simultaneously speaks
about God and the World or the World and God.
This post
made me decide to google the question, «What does the Bible say
about «
vision»?»
That his left - looking
vision has
made everything worse, there's something to that
makes talking
about unseating an incumbent worth talking
about.
My point here is not to
make dogmatic claims
about what will ever be scientifically or technically possible, but to suggest once again the Hall's own
vision of the future may take too seriously the self - image of some technologists as practitioners of a purely rational and completely formalizable activity.
A man who habitually
made right moral decisions would develop good moral dispositions, and these dispositions would clarify his
vision such that further correct decisions
about conduct would be
made.
Structural facts (e.g.,
about genetics or cosmology) do not disclose their own meaning, and no amount of scientific combination of the data in one area of existence will directly yield a
vision of the whole by means of which we can begin to
make sense out of all existence.
The wonderful thing
about this visionary pope, though, is that even as he looks towards the struggles we will all have to go through, he
makes real and convincing his
vision of the future: he works it into the present reality in which we already live.
Smart, feisty, funny, and extremely knowledgeable
about both Bolivian culture and American culture, she represents all that
makes World
Vision's staff so effective.
Even a Kingdom - inspired
vision of the good future can be given flesh and blood reality only by
making use of facts
about what is and can be.