Sentences with phrase «making applications for judicial review»

Obtaining urgent injunctive relief, for example in relation to employee fraud and making applications for judicial review against public authorities and central government

Not exact matches

55 (1) Judicial review by the Federal Court of Appeal with respect to any order made under subsection 54 (1) is commenced by making an application for leave to the Court.

Judicial review is a paper — based process and the applications for interim relief are usually made on paper in the first instance.

The existence of unresolved judicial review proceedings can cause significant problems for a public body even where a party does not make an application for interim relief.

The deputy principal then made an application to the High Court to review this decision, by way of judicial review (a review procedure for decisions / actions of public bodies).

(39) On an application for judicial review of the arbitrator's decision, no determination or selection that the arbitrator was required to make under subsection (29) shall be overturned unless the determination or selection was patently unreasonable.

Two questions arose: (i) whether s 204 contained an express requirement under which the county court was required by an enactment to make a decision applying the principles that were applied by the court on an application for judicial review, thus placing s 204 appeals within the public law category; and (ii) if not, whether there were any other reasons requiring the application of judicial review principles with the result that s 204 appeals fell within the post-LASPO 2012 civil legal aid regime.

Lemaigre was a Federal Court application for judicial review of a Dene band decision made under the Clearwater River Dene Nation Election Act and Regulation.

(3) An application for judicial review and any appeal from an order of the court on the application does not stay the decision made under this Act.

Cs made their claim and in doing so, relied upon the commentary in Volume 38 (2) of the Encyclopaedia of Forms & Precedents that states the inclusion of a «call - in» clause should at least be considered in any case other than: «the very simplest cases such as an application for change of use or for the carrying out of relatively minor building operations where... it is unlikely that the grant of planning permission would be challenged by third parties by way of judicial review....»

Five claimants made three applications for judicial review of the secretary of state's refusal to grant, or delay in granting, certificates of approval.

R (Feakins) v. Secretary of State (CA)[2004] 1 WLR 1761 An applicant for judicial review had standing to make the application even though he had indicated he would accept the decision under challenge if he was paid a sufficient sum of money.

[1] This is an application brought by the applicant, Navjeen Kaberwal («Kaberwal»), for judicial review of a decision made by the Ministry of the Economy, Immigration Services («Ministry») on December 31, 2012 suspending Kaberwal's right to submit applications to the Ministry for a period of two years.

The European Court and Actions for Annulment: Codebook for Data Set on Actions under Article 230, 1954 - 2006 Alec Stone Sweet and Thomas L. Brunell The data set, which is made accessible here, contains the first 5,143 Art. 230 actions for annulment — applications for the judicial review of the legality of Community acts — filed with the European Court of Justice.

Justice Stratas grants Alberta's application to intervene on the presumption that the Crown represents the interest of Albertans in the proceedings (at paras 11 - 27) and denies the application to intervene made by the Tsartlip First Nation on the basis it is really an application for judicial review under the guise of an intervention and its submissions would be duplicative of existing parties (at paras 35 - 54).

This application for judicial review was dismissed by the Superior Court of Ontario, but in Campbell J.'s reasons for judgment he made extensive statements regarding Mr. Groia's conduct during the trial (para. 12).

Presumably judicial review would be available, but that would require an application to the Court of Queen's Bench with considerable costs and delay, making such an application unfeasible for most victims of domestic violence.

An application for judicial review must be filed within 15 days or 60 days of receiving the refusal, depending on whether the decision was made within Canada or outside of Canada respectively.

As there was then an opportunity for the Order to be set aside without delay on an application of judicial review principles, I think that it was unnecessary for an opportunity to be provided for the Bank to be consulted before the Order was made in order to satisfy the requirements of the article.

In cases where an application for a sponsorship, Canadian work permit or visas, refugee claim, or federal skilled worker is denied or refused or in the case where a deportation or removal from Canada is issued, an appeal or an Application for Judicial Review can be made to reverse the decision of the immigration aapplication for a sponsorship, Canadian work permit or visas, refugee claim, or federal skilled worker is denied or refused or in the case where a deportation or removal from Canada is issued, an appeal or an Application for Judicial Review can be made to reverse the decision of the immigration aApplication for Judicial Review can be made to reverse the decision of the immigration authorities.

Shortly before the consultation date on November 28, 2013, I was advised that the College had received a letter suggesting that an application for judicial review would be made of a ratio review panel decision that I had chaired (which had issued over 6 months ago), on the basis of «a reasonable apprehension of bias».

The Court of Appeal emphasised the importance of making prompt applications for judicial review against deportation decisions and set out the principles to be followed in future cases — see the judgment of Lord Justice Buxton at para 17.

Each level of people's court should establish a centralized administrative platform for the judicial review of arbitration awards, to strengthen the informatized management and data analysis of cases regarding applications to confirm the validity of an arbitation agreement, cases regarding applications to cancel or enforce arbitration awards of our domestic arbitration institutions, applications to recognize and enforce Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region, Taiwan Region arbitration awards, cases regarding applications to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards, and cases relating to the judicial review of arbitration such as refusal to accept, reject the filing, or objection to jurisdiction and others relating to the confirmation of the validity of an arbitration agreement; the effective guarantee of the correct application of law and of a unified yardstick for judicial decision - making.

For example, if all evidence has been submitted to the judge who is reviewing the evidence but has not yet rendered a decision, and the stock price of a public company held by one spouse tanked unexpectedly, you could then make an application to the trial judge to reopen the trial, and take judicial notice of the current, much lower, stock price.

In late May, the court heard an application for judicial review in BMO v. Sasso seeking to set aside the order of an adjudicator made during a hearing under the provisions of the Canada Labour Code that dealt with documents the Bank of Montreal claimed were privileged.

In particular, the FCA reasoned that because the outcome of the environmental assessment and regulatory review (the report of the Joint Review Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the new legislative scheme, «no decisions about legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no application for judicial review lay from the rreview (the report of the Joint Review Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the new legislative scheme, «no decisions about legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no application for judicial review lay from the rReview Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the new legislative scheme, «no decisions about legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no application for judicial review lay from the rreview lay from the report.