In fact, Bart's been
making those arguments in a detailed and impressive fashion for a while now.
As Dave Barry would say, I am not making this up — a senior Dominion executive really is
making these arguments in the press.
By
making the arguments in a big speech, the PM is nevertheless helping the nationalists.
While this may be true for rarer metals, it is tough to
make this argument in regards to aluminum and steel, which are plentiful in supply.
I think everyone, anyone who's ever
made an argument in, since arguments began, has chosen evidence to support their arguments.
The point is, Russell
made that argument in response to Christianity.
It is possible to
make the argument in support of traditional marriage, but it is essential to have the courage of one's convictions.
Like Olson, the justices had to
make their arguments in light of U.S. legal history, past and present religious pluralism, and variegated religio - political support of the God - phrase in the pledge.
One may
make that argument in an eminently rational way, although in a way that will not be convincing to many people.
It's called setting up a «straw man» argument, in which you then appear to
make an argument in tearing the straw man down, which didn't exist to begin with.
If you are horribly unproficient in a language, I suggest that you not try to
make an argument in that language.
@Chad «well, lets see if we can figure out why no atheist debater that I am aware of ever attempts to
make that argument in a public forum of any kind.
But in
making this argument in 2002, Reno maintained that orthodox believers should not leave their home churches.
(And based on Jay Jacobs» babbling in the aftermath of the Iron Bowl, Missouri will
make the argument in less of an enraged - Golden - Corral - patron manner.)
Supporters of Proposition 140
made these arguments in its favor in the state's official voter guide:
Putland's analysis in that blog post relies on the US constitution to
make an argument in relation to Australia, and tendentially construes the rule of law.
Samuel Russell writes: «Putland's analysis in that blog post relies on the US constitution to
make an argument in relation to Australia...»
He suggests that any minister hoping to
make any argument in favour of Brexit will have to do so from the backbenches.
«CSEA has tried to get local officials to do what's right by
making our argument in the court of public opinion,» Donohue said.
The government
made arguments in papers filed Friday in Manhattan federal court.
Miner said
she made arguments in private to councilors that cutting overtime for firefighters would cost the city federal funding and that police overtime money couldn't simply be thrown at hiring new officers.
They are where different constituencies stake out territory and
make their arguments in the technological drama.
They made their argument in a study published last month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
He acknowledges that he could never
make his argument in the form of a video game or TV show: it takes a book to make the case.
He acknowledges that he could never
make his argument in the
My colleague Thomas Kane
made these arguments in a recent essay for CommonWealth.
I applaud Detroit News columnist Ingrid Jacques for clearly
making this argument in her May 11 column, «Stop the school reform merry - go - round.»
I would love to
make that argument in court.
Cultural essay is one of the most pleasant kinds of the essay, as you do not have to
make any argument in your culture essay or any of the boring literary analysis; all you have to do is to make a great research at the subject and to present your results in your culture essay writing.
The fact that people aren't necessarily good at handling their money once they have retired
makes the arguments in favor of annuities even more compelling.
It's some extreme revisionist history, complete ignorance or denying of historical analysis, and stretching anecdotal assumptions to epic proportions to be able to
make your argument in the way you are.
«The (IPCC) argument
makes arguments in support of intelligent design sound rigorous by comparison.»
The core problem, I believe, is the interaction between our penchant for biased reasoning on the one hand, the deeply polarized political climate (which pushes emotional buttons rather than encouraging calm deliberation), and the rich misinformation environment (there's a ready -
made argument in defense of anything and everything).
Many commentators to ClimateEthics argue that since people are self - interested beings, it is more important to
make arguments in support of climate change based upon self - interest rather than ethical arguments.
Most significantly, a growing number of environmentalists now
make arguments in favour of nuclear power, GM technology and even fracking, and have questioned the policies designed to protect the climate and natural environment.
Dr. Lindzen seems to have first
made this argument in a 2002 letter to his local mayor in Newton, Massachusetts.
It's strange to say that our ability to adapt will keep us out of trouble whilst
making an argument in favour of inaction.
For what it is worth, I've
made that argument in the latest issue of the left wing American monthly Z magazine.
I will not claim to understand all the concept laid out here, but I will offer what I believe is a «tell» that someone is
making an argument in bad faith.
But if, as I suspect, its simply a smokescreen by Realclimate to pop up here, throw out a «the science is settled — come and see at Realclimate» comment and then disappear without
making any argument in open forum then I think Venter has a point.
The argument
makes arguments in support of intelligent design sound rigorous by comparison.
Lawyers representing the Department of Justice and the state of Washington
made their arguments in front of three federal judges entirely by telephone — arguments that were streamed live across the globe.
If that's not possible, your lawyer can file a lawsuit and
make the argument in support of your claim to a judge or jury.
There would be a good case for sanctioning you if
you made that argument in court.
While a party arguing to reverse a trial court's decision must show that the argument that they are making on appeal was «preserved» by that party at trial by
making that argument in the trial court, the converse is not true.
At her She Negotiates blog, Victoria Pynchon
makes the argument in a recent post that although there is greater diversity among judges and juries these days, this diversity is less significant than it might appear because key Supreme Court decisions have had the effect of steering disputes out of court and into private arbitrations.
CCLA's advocacy efforts continue to challenge these developments: next year we will
make arguments in R. v. Nur and R. v. Smickle, two appellate cases that are bringing constitutional challenges to mandatory minimum sentences.
To decrease the amount of local comments based on this misreading, I want to make it clear that I do not
make this argument in the article.
A lot more information will need to be researched and you will be expected to form an opinion or
make an argument in support or against what someone else claims.
In California, both parents have a right to
make their arguments in court.