Sentences with phrase «making arguments like»

While some developers may be taking this case to mean that they should avoid preparing amendments to disclosure statements, in order to prevent purchasers from making arguments like Dwane's, the case actually stands for the opposite.

And then there are others making arguments like this independently - e.g. Tsonis, A. A., K. Swanson, and S. Kravtsov (2007), A new dynamical mechanism for major climate shifts, Geophys.

Every time autistic people are forced to make arguments like the one I'm making right now, it depletes energy (or «spoons») that we could otherwise apply to advocating for ourselves in more constructive ways — or simply getting through another day.

6) Ken Fisher made an argument like this in his book The Wall Street Waltz.

One can only shake one's head in dismay that anyone would have the gall to make an argument like this.

Not exact matches

I admire her professionalism, and there is an argument to be made from the civil - liberties side that maybe the government is overstepping and he's entitled like anybody to a vigorous defense.»

«But clients look at their statements and say, «I appreciate your arguments, but I'd really like to make some money.

In his book «The All - or - Nothing Marriage,» Eli Finkel, a psychologist at Northwestern University and a professor at the Kellogg School of Management, made a similar argument: Modern spouses look to each other for friendship, sexual fulfillment, intellectual growth — not just financial stability, like they did in years past.

So while a firm like NEA may not have a woman at the table when the big decisions are being made, there is an argument that it can afford the infrastructure needed to stem bad behavior, both at its portfolio companies and within its own ranks.

A few of the arguments, like how the long lineups provide fans an opportunity to talk movies with their fellow attendees, made sense even though I wouldn't consider them a worthy tradeoff for all the other issues.

Many of the outlets that have given up on comments make the same arguments about why they did so, and one of the main ones is that social - media platforms like Twitter (twtr) and Facebook (fb) make comments unnecessary.

«The ability to have folks who can speak that language, help develop arguments and make that case is a helpful approach for a company like AWS to be able to sell their services,» Alexander says.

To make the argument that Quebec judges do it, why can't you, is like the kid who grows up on a country club saying «I can play polo, why can't you?»

While I truly want to be with you on the hands - off - free - market argument, I just have to believe that these rules are in place for good reasons... like making sure your sweet Granny don't get fleeced by a huckster.

No one likes tax increases, though, and an argument can be made that a 15 - per - cent tax will create a disincentive to investment.

Instead, when you make this argument to people about Singapore, lots of people go, «Oh, but it's a small island Asian country,» they start saying, «But, you shouldn't look at it,» and I'm like, «Really?

An argument can be made that there are no «regulators» that can bring down the price of bitcoin like they could with silver.

So if U.S. conservatives want to make the argument that decades of socialized medicine have made Britain's elites too willing to pull the plug on Alfie, they must also confront the possibility that decades of socialized medicine have made them too willing to tolerate the torture of children like Alfie.

Lou Mercer: Or we're always taught the market does not like uncertainty, but you can make an argument that since the election, we've been more uncertain than ever.

It would probably help to make you look more like a person who is literate in the English language and thus is capable of presenting a coherent argument.

A bigger problem is that cynical pols like Romney (and Michelle Bachmann on this issue) end up feeding into this self - defeating narrative because it seems easier than making a real argument about health care or taxes or what have you.

You make up things about me just like your gay arguments.

When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc. make blanket statements and refuse to respond to corrections, criticisms, or valid points refuting those statements, then there is no point in bringing up any kind of argument.

You said, «It's like you change things or make things up as you go along to suit the argument you're making at the time.»

Perhaps the best part of Secretary Clinton's speech was when she took on arguments against religious liberty made by authoritarians in places like Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, and China.

It's like you change things or make things up as you go along to suit the argument you're making at the time.

your immature, irrational and absolute blind remarks toward atheism have been proved that there is no rational argument beyond this point, I suggest you read my post to the fullest and absorb it's meaning, and continue to act like a civilized being, your behavior is not acceptable in any rational debate, you are not making yourself look good.

@Liz — It seems like the argument you are making is valid but only from the perspective of either creating a high risk of complication / retardation which science has proven when children are born to closely related people, and the «Ick» factor of not wanting to imagine two siblings getting it on.

like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had debate, argument, sadness, hilarity... even had someone with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to make any rules... that would almost be like copping out of relationship.

Indeed, I think that a cogent argument can be made for the necessity of something like the Catholic magisterium — a divinely assisted authority that has the «final say» in fundamental questions of interpretation.

atheist like to use these verses quite often but the argument is ridiculous once you understand the point Jesus was making.

Wesley did make some comments that sound like the «slippery - slide» argument of Harold Lindsell: «If there be any mistakes in the Bible, there may as well be a thousand.

Therefore, the statement «even the demons believe, and tremble» is NOT from James, and is NOT in support of his argument, but is from someone who does not like what James is saying, and is objecting to the point James is making.

I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»

And even if all rough correlations could be made smooth by convoluted arguments about cloud covers and the like, the two Genesis accounts themselves, taken as chronologies, do not agree.

While I do not believe that the Resurrection was a historical event, your poorly phrased argument makes not only you, but atheists, agnostics, and non-Christians in general look like fools... primarily because we get associated with silly arguments like this.

Atlanta is often compared to Twin Peaks (creator Donald Glover said it himself about the show's first season, calling it «Twin Peaks with rappers»), but there's an argument to be made it's more like The Simpsons.

In recent years, conservative Aristotelian - Thomists like Patrick Deneen and Alasdair MacIntyre have made the argument that a moral philosophy entailing a substantive account of human happiness or fulfillment is simply incompatible with the American liberal - democratic political order.

Yes, they need to be taught to believe in gods, but babies don't have the ability to determine that gods are, or aren't real either, which make that argument a whole lot less compelling than the people who like to use it would like.

Defending the argument is only necessary because the stupid an unsubstantiated claim that «atheists killed more than Christians» is repeatedly made, and usually done so with imaginary figures like «Mao killed 800 million people».

Your argument is just like that of Brahmins in my country who used to scare people that solar eclipse occurs bcoz we made the gods angry and lightning strikes for the same reason.

Just because pro-choice advocates make these arguments does not mean that courts (the same courts that are ready to overrule Roe) are likely to discover abortion rights under a statute that does not even mention abortion and that was enacted with the support of pro-life groups like the National Association of Evangelicals and the Mormon Church.

To critics of biblical inerrancy, it sounds like we Christians are making the same argument as this man uses: Is this what we do with Scripture?

I will be happy to calmy and rationally debate you as long as you would like, but if you think I simply don't understand your argument because I don't agree with it, then you've made a poor deduction.

Instead, he makes something much more like a deistic argument, although in reverse.

TheCapitalist, «it is funny how you just contradicted an argument that many atheists make, which is to say that Jesus was just copycat myth derived off of «ancient gods» like Hercules.»

Like Olson, the justices had to make their arguments in light of U.S. legal history, past and present religious pluralism, and variegated religio - political support of the God - phrase in the pledge.

To speak for a moment of the general argument of the Intelligent Design movement before getting specifically to Professor Johnson's latest book, I would like to make the following point clear.

Indeed, an argument could be made that at no time since the First Great Awakening have so many churches of disparate denominational, theological and stylistic approaches been so united in terms of their music: one can now walk into old - line Pentecostal churches, small - town evangelical congregations, mall - like suburban megachurches, and many a mainline Protestant sanctuary across the country on any given Sunday morning and hear the same hymns and choruses done in approximately the same musical styles, with similar settings and instrumentation.

Your ignorance, arrogance, and trite expressions like that make your argument so predictably bad.